Re: HTTP Error 414. The request URL is too long.

2023-03-09 Thread Stefan Mayr
Am 10.03.2023 um 07:58 schrieb Thomas Hoffmann (Speed4Trade GmbH): Hello, -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Seth Mayers Gesendet: Freitag, 10. März 2023 01:14 An: Tomcat Users List Betreff: Re: HTTP Error 414. The request URL is too long. Thanks. Sadly I know how the data is being

AW: connecting tomcat server to eclipse java ee

2023-03-09 Thread Thomas Hoffmann (Speed4Trade GmbH)
Hello, as an alternative, you can also create a normal java debug configuration with the main class org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap Add all the service parameters to the tab Arguments --> VM-arguments. As a program argument I use -config "\server.xml" start Add the needed Tomcat jars to

AW: --add-opens gives me unknown module

2023-03-09 Thread Thomas Hoffmann (Speed4Trade GmbH)
Hello, it seems you are using an outdated library which is not compatible to java 17. Are there any other libraries except spring boot which might use the proxy class? Best is to search for a newer version and upgrade the corresponding library. Greetings, Thomas > -Ursprüngliche

AW: HTTP Error 414. The request URL is too long.

2023-03-09 Thread Thomas Hoffmann (Speed4Trade GmbH)
Hello, > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Seth Mayers > Gesendet: Freitag, 10. März 2023 01:14 > An: Tomcat Users List > Betreff: Re: HTTP Error 414. The request URL is too long. > > Thanks. Sadly I know how the data is being pushed. It is poorly architected. > Developers are working

Re: connecting tomcat server to eclipse java ee

2023-03-09 Thread JIM HENK
Well…. When you see that message, Eclipse has gone through it’s table of Tomcat version possibilities known at the time your version of Eclipse was published, and hasn't found it. Must’ve come *after*. Therefore, The version of Eclipse you need to use has got to have been released *after*

--add-opens gives me unknown module

2023-03-09 Thread Neil Aggarwal
Hey everyone: I am trying to deploy a Spring Boot 3.0.4 application to a Tomcat 10.1.7 server. The machine has java 17 installed. When I try to loan tomcat, it gives me this error: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field private static final

Re: connecting tomcat server to eclipse java ee

2023-03-09 Thread Mark Eggers
Stephanie, On 3/9/2023 7:06 PM, Stephanie Panah wrote: I was able to resolve the issue. I found: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62764029/unknown-version-of-tomcat-was-specified-with-tomcat-9-0-37 --you need to open the folder once --It will ask you for permission to enter after which its

Re: connecting tomcat server to eclipse java ee

2023-03-09 Thread Stephanie Panah
I was able to resolve the issue. I found: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62764029/unknown-version-of-tomcat-was-specified-with-tomcat-9-0-37 --you need to open the folder once --It will ask you for permission to enter after which its contents will be visible to you as well as Eclipse --after

Re: connecting tomcat server to eclipse java ee

2023-03-09 Thread Veliz Broncano
Hi! You are very pretty On Thu, Mar 9, 2023, 9:37 PM Stephanie Panah wrote: > Help please. I have installed: Java EE, Eclipse and Tomcat. > When I try to connect the server, I encounter: > Unknown version of Tomcat was specified. > I am looking all over. please help > > Java EE for web

connecting tomcat server to eclipse java ee

2023-03-09 Thread Stephanie Panah
Help please. I have installed: Java EE, Eclipse and Tomcat. When I try to connect the server, I encounter: Unknown version of Tomcat was specified. I am looking all over. please help Java EE for web developers C:\Users\steph> java -fullversion java full version "17.0.6+9-LTS-190" and Eclipse IDE

Re: HTTP Error 414. The request URL is too long.

2023-03-09 Thread Seth Mayers
Thanks. Sadly I know how the data is being pushed. It is poorly architected. Developers are working to re-write it but I am looking for a short term solution until they can complete that project. I found where windows is logging the error. I am just not sure which process writes to this log

Re: HTTP Error 414. The request URL is too long.

2023-03-09 Thread Terence M. Bandoian
On 3/9/2023 5:47 PM, Jason Tan wrote: Hi Seth, One of my customer had the same error. We also tried increasing maxHttpHeaderSize as suggested on Google. It worked for him for a while, but he encountered the same error again later on. Our developers got involved and later discovered that our

RE: HTTP Error 414. The request URL is too long.

2023-03-09 Thread Jason Tan
Hi Seth, One of my customer had the same error. We also tried increasing maxHttpHeaderSize as suggested on Google. It worked for him for a while, but he encountered the same error again later on. Our developers got involved and later discovered that our app was trying to display all his

Re: Tomcat V8.5.85

2023-03-09 Thread Nitish Khune
The issue is fixed in latest release. Thanks @Christopher Schultz From: Christopher Schultz Date: Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 3:01 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Tomcat V8.5.85 Nitish, On 2/24/23 13:50, Nitish Khune wrote: > Since I upgraded

Re: HTTP Error 414. The request URL is too long.

2023-03-09 Thread Mark Thomas
On 09/03/2023 20:59, Seth Mayers wrote: I am running Apache Tomcat Version 9.0.48. If I post a transaction that is very large, I get the "414; The request URL is too long". I have tried adding a bunch of parameters to my server.xml file but none of them seem to work. I have tried:

HTTP Error 414. The request URL is too long.

2023-03-09 Thread Seth Mayers
I am running Apache Tomcat Version 9.0.48. If I post a transaction that is very large, I get the "414; The request URL is too long". I have tried adding a bunch of parameters to my server.xml file but none of them seem to work. I have tried: maxHttpHeaderSize="262144" maxSavePostSize="-1"

Re: Tomcat 9.0.72 Firefox issue with 204 response (Empty Body)

2023-03-09 Thread Mark Thomas
On 09/03/2023 18:19, Bhavesh Mistry wrote: Hi Mark, Your sample application worked 204 Firefox and our application does not work. That leads me to believe *Application Filter *is an issue. But should tomcat throw an exception if the response is already committed? A call to setStatus() after

Re: Tomcat 9.0.72 Firefox issue with 204 response (Empty Body)

2023-03-09 Thread Bhavesh Mistry
Hi Mark, Your sample application worked 204 Firefox and our application does not work. That leads me to believe *Application Filter *is an issue. But should tomcat throw an exception if the response is already committed? I will try to see if I can reproduce it using a filter with the sample app

Re: Apache Tomcat wire logging does not show POST data payload

2023-03-09 Thread Christopher Schultz
Aditya, On 3/9/23 09:29, Aditya Kumar wrote: I edited my log4j2.xml to include these lines: Now in my defined serverlog I see the http wire traffic I am after. However there is one problem. For POST requests from my Tomcat server I can only see request/response HTTP headers. I cannot

Apache Tomcat wire logging does not show POST data payload

2023-03-09 Thread Aditya Kumar
I edited my log4j2.xml to include these lines: Now in my defined serverlog I see the http wire traffic I am after. However there is one problem. For POST requests from my Tomcat server I can only see request/response HTTP headers. I cannot see the POST data payload. Is there a way to get

Re: Tomcat 9.0.72 Firefox issue with 204 response (Empty Body)

2023-03-09 Thread Mark Thomas
On 08/03/2023 21:32, Bhavesh Mistry wrote: Hi Mark, We have a NAT rule that forwards 443 to 8443. OK. That explains the change in port. Trust me on that, we have a direct connection. To rule out any networking layer issues, I did direct ssh -L 8443:localhost:8443 admin@10.40.207.140 and

Re: Encountered java.sql.sqlexception "the url cannot be null" starting from tomcat 9.0.71

2023-03-09 Thread Mark Thomas
On 09/03/2023 05:55, Poh Wei Xiang wrote: Hi, Glad to hear that this is going to be fixed. Do you have a sample context format to work with connectionstring? You just duplicate the current setting for url to connectionString. So the configuration at the start of this thread becomes: