Re: Want to customise the tomcat's session logic

2009-11-05 Thread Sam Gendler
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Pid wrote: > On 02/11/2009 10:06, S Arvind wrote: > >> Hi Tomcat developers, >> >>Bascially my requirement is ability to control the session >> sharing in browser. Till now we maintained each application as differnet >> context but pointing to same doc-

trouble with connector configured to receive from SSL accelerator

2009-10-12 Thread Sam Gendler
[quickie synopsis] A request arriving on a connector configured for scheme=https and with secure=true is generating absolute redirect urls with scheme=https and port = 80 (https://localhost:80/path.html) because incoming request was on 443 and didn't have an explicit port in the Host header. [/quic

Re: trouble with connector configured to receive from SSL accelerator

2009-10-12 Thread Sam Gendler
the incorrect default of 80 when no port is specified in the url. On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Sam Gendler wrote: > [quickie synopsis] > A request arriving on a connector configured for scheme=https and with > secure=true is generating absolute redirect urls with scheme=https and po

Re: trouble with connector configured to receive from SSL accelerator

2009-10-13 Thread Sam Gendler
momentarily. On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Sam Gendler wrote: > That looks like it will work, but it doesn't explain why the connector > would think port 80 was appropriate. I could see port 8090 showing up, but > given that the scheme is https and there was no port number in t

Re: trouble with connector configured to receive from SSL accelerator

2009-10-13 Thread Sam Gendler
? It just seems like a bug to me. It does look like proxyPort can be used to force it to 443, though, so that will work. On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Peter Crowther < peter.crowt...@melandra.com> wrote: > 2009/10/13 Sam Gendler : > > That method uses > > request.getSc

Re: trouble with connector configured to receive from SSL accelerator

2009-10-13 Thread Sam Gendler
> > > > No. That is by design. The session ID is almost as valuable as the > password. If you need SSL to protect the password, you should use SSL to > protect the session ID. > > Well, that's fairly application specific, but the argument has also been done to death elsewhere. Workaround is alread