Re: Request for a technical review
Appreciate your feedback, Mark. I'll get it incorporated ASAP. On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 8:26 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > On 11/12/2018 19:20, Mallory Mooney wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > It's been a long time coming, so I wanted to resurrect this thread one > more > > time to share the now published post. You can find it at > > https://www.datadoghq.com/blog/tomcat-architecture-and-performance/. > > Now I can see the document without having to authenticate... > > The first architecture diagram: > - doesn't show any hosts > - incorrectly classes a "Service" as a "webapp" (a context is a webapp) > - shows the unusual setup of multiple services > > "Server" and "Service" are not peers. "Service" must be nested inside > "Server". > > The following sentence is misleading at best: > "The engine returns the appropriate response (e.g., JSP page, servlet) > to the client based on the Host request-header field in the request." > > AJP allows integration with multiple reverse proxies. Not just httpd. > > It is extremely debatable whether using httpd for static content is more > efficient. > > The description of the differences between APR/native and NIO[2] is > wrong. All the connectors support non-blocking. When the switch between > non-blocking and simulated blocking happens depends on whether there is > an active request and the APIs used by the application. > > Note there can be more than one acceptor thread. > > The default for minSpareThreads does not agree with the Tomcat docs - it > should be 10. It is 25 for an Executor. > > Using an Executor doesn't "evenly distribute threads across multiple > connectors". By providing a single thread pool for multiple connectors > threads can be used more efficiently. That means that - rather than an > even distribution - a connector could be starved of threads during a > period of heavy load if all the threads are allocated to a different > connector (unlikely but possible). Any admin/monitoring services exposed > via HTTP probably needs to have a dedicated thread pool to ensure it is > always available. > > It would be worth including an upfront warning of about the (lack of) > security in JMX. There is almost no granularity in the access controls > and brute force are easy to mount but hard to detect. The Tomcat > security guide discusses this in more detail. > > maxTime isn't a "cumulative count". It is the longest time for any > single request to complete. > > Tomcat won't return 503s if it runs out of threads. It will simply drop > the connection. If a reverse proxy is being used, it will probably > return a 503 in those circumstances. > > Nothing jumped out at me while I was reading the metrics sections. I'd > probably add a note that an OOME means you need to restart the server. > An OOME might be recoverable or might not. As a user there is no way to > tell. The only safe thing to do is to restart. > > Mark > > > > > I hope everyone has a great week! > > Mallory > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 4:28 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > > > >> On 02/11/2018 16:34, Mallory Mooney wrote: > >>> Hi everyone! > >>> > >>> Just wanted to check-in to see if anyone has had the chance to take a > >> look > >>> at the draft and leave feedback. I'll be locking things down for this > one > >>> by Thursday of next week (Nov. 8), so there's some time left if you are > >>> still working through it. > >> > >> Note I suspect a number of folks aren't even looking at it because it is > >> behind an authentication-wall (regardless of how willingly / speedily > >> access is granted on request). > >> > >> Mark > >> > >> > >>> > >>> Have a great weekend! > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 7:52 AM Mallory Mooney < > >> mallory.moo...@datadoghq.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi all! > >>>> > >>>> Just wanted to give you an update. I am working to get things for this > >>>> series wrapped up by the first week of November. Hopefully, that still > >>>> gives everyone enough time to review and leave any feedback. > >>>> > >>>> Mallory > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 3:37 PM Mallory Mooney < > >>>> mallory.moo...@datadoghq.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Igal, it will be available publicly once publish
Re: Request for a technical review
Hi all! It's been a long time coming, so I wanted to resurrect this thread one more time to share the now published post. You can find it at https://www.datadoghq.com/blog/tomcat-architecture-and-performance/. I hope everyone has a great week! Mallory On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 4:28 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > On 02/11/2018 16:34, Mallory Mooney wrote: > > Hi everyone! > > > > Just wanted to check-in to see if anyone has had the chance to take a > look > > at the draft and leave feedback. I'll be locking things down for this one > > by Thursday of next week (Nov. 8), so there's some time left if you are > > still working through it. > > Note I suspect a number of folks aren't even looking at it because it is > behind an authentication-wall (regardless of how willingly / speedily > access is granted on request). > > Mark > > > > > > Have a great weekend! > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 7:52 AM Mallory Mooney < > mallory.moo...@datadoghq.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi all! > >> > >> Just wanted to give you an update. I am working to get things for this > >> series wrapped up by the first week of November. Hopefully, that still > >> gives everyone enough time to review and leave any feedback. > >> > >> Mallory > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 3:37 PM Mallory Mooney < > >> mallory.moo...@datadoghq.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Igal, it will be available publicly once published! I don't have an > >>> official publish date yet but can share that when it becomes more > concrete. > >>> > >>> And no PRs yet, Chris! It's still in the less cool GDoc stage of the > >>> review process. :) > >>> > >>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:36 PM Igal Sapir wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 10/12/2018 11:23 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > > Mallory, > > > > On 10/12/18 13:23, Mallory Mooney wrote: > >>>>>>> I definitely appreciate everyone's willingness to help out! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Here is the link to the GDoc: > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fudlXj055nnPd-1lUoAXIS2ge8qNI56_jgUhHgKczFE/edit?usp=sharing > >>>>>>> Requesting access will still be needed, but I can grant that > ASAP. > >>>>>>> I want to make sure I can attribute comments/suggestions to > >>>>>>> specific people, so I know who to thank, and who to follow up with > >>>>>>> if I need more clarification on a specific comment. Plus, it makes > >>>>>>> the IT department happy. > > What, no GitHub PRs? ;) > >>>>> > >>>>> +1 > >>>>> > >>>>> Is that going to be publicly available or is it a > >>>>> proprietary/private/commercial guide? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Igal > >>>>> > > -chris > > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 9:53 AM Christopher Schultz < > >>>>>>> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Mark, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 10/10/18 6:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/18 17:44, Mallory Mooney wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I work for Datadog and am writing a guide about monitoring > >>>>>>>>>>> Tomcat (with or without Datadog). I'd love to get some > >>>>>>>>>>> feedback on the technical content. The project maintainers > >>>>>>>>>>> we reached out to recommended we post a request here. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Would anyone be up for that? I can send the post link to > >>>>>>>>>>> someone directly. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Appreciate your help and time! > >>>>>>>>>> Why not post the link here so the community can review the > >>>>>>>>>> document? > >>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> There are many active community members who have an interest in > >>>>>>> monitoring. I'm sure you'll get lots of feedback. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -chris > >>>>>>>> > - > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> - > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> - > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Mallory Mooney > >>> Technical Content Writer > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Mallory Mooney > >> Technical Content Writer > >> > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > -- Mallory Mooney Technical Content Writer
Re: Request for a technical review
Hi everyone! Just wanted to check-in to see if anyone has had the chance to take a look at the draft and leave feedback. I'll be locking things down for this one by Thursday of next week (Nov. 8), so there's some time left if you are still working through it. Have a great weekend! On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 7:52 AM Mallory Mooney wrote: > Hi all! > > Just wanted to give you an update. I am working to get things for this > series wrapped up by the first week of November. Hopefully, that still > gives everyone enough time to review and leave any feedback. > > Mallory > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 3:37 PM Mallory Mooney < > mallory.moo...@datadoghq.com> wrote: > >> Igal, it will be available publicly once published! I don't have an >> official publish date yet but can share that when it becomes more concrete. >> >> And no PRs yet, Chris! It's still in the less cool GDoc stage of the >> review process. :) >> >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:36 PM Igal Sapir wrote: >> >>> On 10/12/2018 11:23 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: >>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> > Hash: SHA256 >>> > >>> > Mallory, >>> > >>> > On 10/12/18 13:23, Mallory Mooney wrote: >>> >> I definitely appreciate everyone's willingness to help out! >>> >> >>> >> Here is the link to the GDoc: >>> >> >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fudlXj055nnPd-1lUoAXIS2ge8qNI56_jgUhHgKczFE/edit?usp=sharing >>> >> Requesting access will still be needed, but I can grant that ASAP. >>> >> I want to make sure I can attribute comments/suggestions to >>> >> specific people, so I know who to thank, and who to follow up with >>> >> if I need more clarification on a specific comment. Plus, it makes >>> >> the IT department happy. >>> > What, no GitHub PRs? ;) >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> Is that going to be publicly available or is it a >>> proprietary/private/commercial guide? >>> >>> >>> Igal >>> >>> > - -chris >>> > >>> >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 9:53 AM Christopher Schultz < >>> >> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Mark, >>> >> >>> >> On 10/10/18 6:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> >>>>> On 10/10/18 17:44, Mallory Mooney wrote: >>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> I work for Datadog and am writing a guide about monitoring >>> >>>>>> Tomcat (with or without Datadog). I'd love to get some >>> >>>>>> feedback on the technical content. The project maintainers >>> >>>>>> we reached out to recommended we post a request here. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> Would anyone be up for that? I can send the post link to >>> >>>>>> someone directly. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> Appreciate your help and time! >>> >>>>> Why not post the link here so the community can review the >>> >>>>> document? >>> >> +1 >>> >> >>> >> There are many active community members who have an interest in >>> >> monitoring. I'm sure you'll get lots of feedback. >>> >> >>> >> -chris >>> >>> - >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- >>> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - https://www.enigmail.net/ >>> > >>> > iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEMmKgYcQvxMe7tcJcHPApP6U8pFgFAlvA5qUACgkQHPApP6U8 >>> > pFjPDg/+NNmp2sdTXhuPD2cXJTtBGXGMoOLost629AJF2R5ddG79a685TDPENn6B >>> > NVPInUppI6U42RgK9hYs6/3JNpHfMIDay8HC7zaErAiu4wBHowI3yFckofYJjUwD >>> > Wcd2Wzo+eBDZrf2PgwqiBr41nw7kbkeEAQcGeBVce7RL/+3r8Fz7FG++P5Bguu7d >>> > 0N9S7y6leD3AdkX1o+JC9hQ6/AP2F8rZc8sws57Q2dpeV5QtK+8Pf2qOQpd6fskB >>> > RDK4RQ1f4nLeAZgQ6BibUkwOQj6Fw7jPBHKGIfm6m5MOHvROkRTMV+fX3oLAd/dG >>> > 3S1aW/9x8WIbKgYShR9ixxca5QuBNICC/tt9/oTYNj3XPbZLalMmMgOZ/cJcNI+R >>> > kORA8ehwACeP/hIb/aLztze5g8FqyPslM95VPH/TWqgQXxe7bgU5fb6nUF/aCa87 >>> > RC/JXjZ/TZwMM+9xw1PQGH8aXqVGoku4Q/cbwXa4ctqklMKdGzlYRjY7TVjrqyec >>> > ZMdFMgDb76wmDg2luD2g7jUmJJVdAtYiGXIidt5k8EtvymK6Nq/sEwj1SApV5jhT >>> > PGdViui42IeL6IIwKY9gbuihL4btm0we9OXeeVc6fn99lySvsI8JZVgIQJzNmWEX >>> > axmPUrQZI9iIr8qC9tufcuZOxwHpgCjYPIpM4IsR4/vlZv2VpQc= >>> > =j6GH >>> > -END PGP SIGNATURE- >>> > >>> > - >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >>> > >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Mallory Mooney >> Technical Content Writer >> > > > -- > Mallory Mooney > Technical Content Writer > -- Mallory Mooney Technical Content Writer
Re: Request for a technical review
Hi all! Just wanted to give you an update. I am working to get things for this series wrapped up by the first week of November. Hopefully, that still gives everyone enough time to review and leave any feedback. Mallory On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 3:37 PM Mallory Mooney wrote: > Igal, it will be available publicly once published! I don't have an > official publish date yet but can share that when it becomes more concrete. > > And no PRs yet, Chris! It's still in the less cool GDoc stage of the > review process. :) > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:36 PM Igal Sapir wrote: > >> On 10/12/2018 11:23 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: >> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> > Hash: SHA256 >> > >> > Mallory, >> > >> > On 10/12/18 13:23, Mallory Mooney wrote: >> >> I definitely appreciate everyone's willingness to help out! >> >> >> >> Here is the link to the GDoc: >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fudlXj055nnPd-1lUoAXIS2ge8qNI56_jgUhHgKczFE/edit?usp=sharing >> >> Requesting access will still be needed, but I can grant that ASAP. >> >> I want to make sure I can attribute comments/suggestions to >> >> specific people, so I know who to thank, and who to follow up with >> >> if I need more clarification on a specific comment. Plus, it makes >> >> the IT department happy. >> > What, no GitHub PRs? ;) >> >> +1 >> >> Is that going to be publicly available or is it a >> proprietary/private/commercial guide? >> >> >> Igal >> >> > - -chris >> > >> >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 9:53 AM Christopher Schultz < >> >> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> Mark, >> >> >> >> On 10/10/18 6:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> >>>>> On 10/10/18 17:44, Mallory Mooney wrote: >> >>>>>> Hi all, >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> I work for Datadog and am writing a guide about monitoring >> >>>>>> Tomcat (with or without Datadog). I'd love to get some >> >>>>>> feedback on the technical content. The project maintainers >> >>>>>> we reached out to recommended we post a request here. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Would anyone be up for that? I can send the post link to >> >>>>>> someone directly. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Appreciate your help and time! >> >>>>> Why not post the link here so the community can review the >> >>>>> document? >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> There are many active community members who have an interest in >> >> monitoring. I'm sure you'll get lots of feedback. >> >> >> >> -chris >> >>> - >> >>> >> >>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >>> >> >>> >> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- >> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - https://www.enigmail.net/ >> > >> > iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEMmKgYcQvxMe7tcJcHPApP6U8pFgFAlvA5qUACgkQHPApP6U8 >> > pFjPDg/+NNmp2sdTXhuPD2cXJTtBGXGMoOLost629AJF2R5ddG79a685TDPENn6B >> > NVPInUppI6U42RgK9hYs6/3JNpHfMIDay8HC7zaErAiu4wBHowI3yFckofYJjUwD >> > Wcd2Wzo+eBDZrf2PgwqiBr41nw7kbkeEAQcGeBVce7RL/+3r8Fz7FG++P5Bguu7d >> > 0N9S7y6leD3AdkX1o+JC9hQ6/AP2F8rZc8sws57Q2dpeV5QtK+8Pf2qOQpd6fskB >> > RDK4RQ1f4nLeAZgQ6BibUkwOQj6Fw7jPBHKGIfm6m5MOHvROkRTMV+fX3oLAd/dG >> > 3S1aW/9x8WIbKgYShR9ixxca5QuBNICC/tt9/oTYNj3XPbZLalMmMgOZ/cJcNI+R >> > kORA8ehwACeP/hIb/aLztze5g8FqyPslM95VPH/TWqgQXxe7bgU5fb6nUF/aCa87 >> > RC/JXjZ/TZwMM+9xw1PQGH8aXqVGoku4Q/cbwXa4ctqklMKdGzlYRjY7TVjrqyec >> > ZMdFMgDb76wmDg2luD2g7jUmJJVdAtYiGXIidt5k8EtvymK6Nq/sEwj1SApV5jhT >> > PGdViui42IeL6IIwKY9gbuihL4btm0we9OXeeVc6fn99lySvsI8JZVgIQJzNmWEX >> > axmPUrQZI9iIr8qC9tufcuZOxwHpgCjYPIpM4IsR4/vlZv2VpQc= >> > =j6GH >> > -END PGP SIGNATURE- >> > >> > - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> > >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >> > > -- > Mallory Mooney > Technical Content Writer > -- Mallory Mooney Technical Content Writer
Re: Request for a technical review
Igal, it will be available publicly once published! I don't have an official publish date yet but can share that when it becomes more concrete. And no PRs yet, Chris! It's still in the less cool GDoc stage of the review process. :) On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:36 PM Igal Sapir wrote: > On 10/12/2018 11:23 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > Mallory, > > > > On 10/12/18 13:23, Mallory Mooney wrote: > >> I definitely appreciate everyone's willingness to help out! > >> > >> Here is the link to the GDoc: > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fudlXj055nnPd-1lUoAXIS2ge8qNI56_jgUhHgKczFE/edit?usp=sharing > >> Requesting access will still be needed, but I can grant that ASAP. > >> I want to make sure I can attribute comments/suggestions to > >> specific people, so I know who to thank, and who to follow up with > >> if I need more clarification on a specific comment. Plus, it makes > >> the IT department happy. > > What, no GitHub PRs? ;) > > +1 > > Is that going to be publicly available or is it a > proprietary/private/commercial guide? > > > Igal > > > - -chris > > > >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 9:53 AM Christopher Schultz < > >> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > >> > >> Mark, > >> > >> On 10/10/18 6:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > >>>>> On 10/10/18 17:44, Mallory Mooney wrote: > >>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I work for Datadog and am writing a guide about monitoring > >>>>>> Tomcat (with or without Datadog). I'd love to get some > >>>>>> feedback on the technical content. The project maintainers > >>>>>> we reached out to recommended we post a request here. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Would anyone be up for that? I can send the post link to > >>>>>> someone directly. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Appreciate your help and time! > >>>>> Why not post the link here so the community can review the > >>>>> document? > >> +1 > >> > >> There are many active community members who have an interest in > >> monitoring. I'm sure you'll get lots of feedback. > >> > >> -chris > >>> - > >>> > >>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >>> > >>> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - https://www.enigmail.net/ > > > > iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEMmKgYcQvxMe7tcJcHPApP6U8pFgFAlvA5qUACgkQHPApP6U8 > > pFjPDg/+NNmp2sdTXhuPD2cXJTtBGXGMoOLost629AJF2R5ddG79a685TDPENn6B > > NVPInUppI6U42RgK9hYs6/3JNpHfMIDay8HC7zaErAiu4wBHowI3yFckofYJjUwD > > Wcd2Wzo+eBDZrf2PgwqiBr41nw7kbkeEAQcGeBVce7RL/+3r8Fz7FG++P5Bguu7d > > 0N9S7y6leD3AdkX1o+JC9hQ6/AP2F8rZc8sws57Q2dpeV5QtK+8Pf2qOQpd6fskB > > RDK4RQ1f4nLeAZgQ6BibUkwOQj6Fw7jPBHKGIfm6m5MOHvROkRTMV+fX3oLAd/dG > > 3S1aW/9x8WIbKgYShR9ixxca5QuBNICC/tt9/oTYNj3XPbZLalMmMgOZ/cJcNI+R > > kORA8ehwACeP/hIb/aLztze5g8FqyPslM95VPH/TWqgQXxe7bgU5fb6nUF/aCa87 > > RC/JXjZ/TZwMM+9xw1PQGH8aXqVGoku4Q/cbwXa4ctqklMKdGzlYRjY7TVjrqyec > > ZMdFMgDb76wmDg2luD2g7jUmJJVdAtYiGXIidt5k8EtvymK6Nq/sEwj1SApV5jhT > > PGdViui42IeL6IIwKY9gbuihL4btm0we9OXeeVc6fn99lySvsI8JZVgIQJzNmWEX > > axmPUrQZI9iIr8qC9tufcuZOxwHpgCjYPIpM4IsR4/vlZv2VpQc= > > =j6GH > > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > -- Mallory Mooney Technical Content Writer
Re: Request for a technical review
I definitely appreciate everyone's willingness to help out! Here is the link to the GDoc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fudlXj055nnPd-1lUoAXIS2ge8qNI56_jgUhHgKczFE/edit?usp=sharing Requesting access will still be needed, but I can grant that ASAP. I want to make sure I can attribute comments/suggestions to specific people, so I know who to thank, and who to follow up with if I need more clarification on a specific comment. Plus, it makes the IT department happy. On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 9:53 AM Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Mark, > > On 10/10/18 6:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 10/10/18 17:44, Mallory Mooney wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I work for Datadog and am writing a guide about monitoring Tomcat > >> (with or without Datadog). I'd love to get some feedback on the > >> technical content. The project maintainers we reached out to > >> recommended we post a request here. > >> > >> Would anyone be up for that? I can send the post link to someone > >> directly. > >> > >> Appreciate your help and time! > > > > Why not post the link here so the community can review the > > document? > > +1 > > There are many active community members who have an interest in > monitoring. I'm sure you'll get lots of feedback. > > - -chris > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - https://www.enigmail.net/ > > iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEMmKgYcQvxMe7tcJcHPApP6U8pFgFAlu/Y9oACgkQHPApP6U8 > pFgX2Q//ZyyT4k/7AywjEY8x4V6vihut86qEU9IP9GQQ9QuiiSJugqU9ngXSDTfg > yB8ftIVGz6FJG+TM1jA5FmcwAMNQ1I1/hxA2pfOYJX6lyowQT0Cy3wd0P5uE5S1O > pLqScf1IaHGZ3nNIfxTMQ2O25pp01LZX7V6VGkTVXHUClY8BphyWcSAy7v52hZ41 > /n9RIxRUSY9qQEEBCKU3JXksN0Ljza1y+Rzh4tUbOtbtI/hCGnvogP3NZ8kH2dAo > hDdxEzCYAz5whOjzZU4348zY1h2IUytrjTXATt6gQRKtZ77S5MxvcDasDSBysHpc > duzdYrErQA71VDJmj2Wgikr/0mej7PUwu/so3WVsxoAyt1SA+Lmc2ldhTJay3bkr > zKjb6j5PpLYL+aLyzj4MR9ng1Mg1c7xFO9zMcZ+Ap4Gw2PgcP+jszDuf6TIzfoC9 > Zd3q9HhnIhR+Cjcz2F5qanw1mF+BgazRdkOjg+qzDfM8NMK28dZoKIjIYQDKnOPF > 2iIRnIq3aPQT3tcgmKwjQpcI1CYvMQe+U9RTt1YBQRzo0Vc4clX9JugM57XVEpEV > e9gNHT3BBK4GeUB8Y85K/BelQ/Rfl4Xk2BIP6R6qmSKvKGXYySFpiKrOgPtKbQhi > EyRCVqSqgFP+U2QIZaFftcsDhQd/8OCLAOBaHDv/kxtHtLkuFL4= > =o6VG > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > -- Mallory Mooney Technical Content Writer
Request for a technical review
Hi all, I work for Datadog and am writing a guide about monitoring Tomcat (with or without Datadog). I'd love to get some feedback on the technical content. The project maintainers we reached out to recommended we post a request here. Would anyone be up for that? I can send the post link to someone directly. Appreciate your help and time! -- Mallory Mooney Technical Content Writer
