Re: Operation has timed out
Hi Fady, can you please try changing default Multicast port to something like : >From port="45564" to port="45562" or port="45560". let me know the outcome will try to fix it and please make sure if you have firewall enable on system please disable it first and then give a try otherwise you have to change firewall configuration to allow multicast traffic. Regards, Ashwin On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Fady Haikal <fadyhai...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > As u know we are using 224.0.0.4 multicast IP for tomcat cluster > (Node1: 10.114.43.102 / Node2: 10.114.43.103) i was trying to ping the > multicast IP i get reply from 10.114.43.51 IP! > > Also i have executed the nslookup for 224.0.0.4 i get the DC IP > (10.114.43.7) and mcast.net domain: > > C:\Users\Administrator>nslookup 224.0.0.4 > Server: hq-dc02.albaraka.com.sd > Address: 10.114.43.7 > > Name:dvmrp.mcast.net > Address: 224.0.0.4 > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Fady Haikal <fadyhai...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Ashwin, > > I'm using the below configuration, please let me know how i can check > > if i'm using a unique multicast address and port > > > > > > > > > className="org.apache.catalina.tribes.membership.McastService" > > address="228.0.0.4" > > port="45564" > > frequency="500" > > dropTime="9000"/> > > > className="org.apache.catalina.tribes.transport.nio.NioReceiver" > > address="auto" > > port="4000" > > autoBind="100" > > selectorTimeout="5000" > > maxThreads="6"/> > > > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:39 AM, ashwin rajput <ash271...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I am not sure if anyone has verified below. > >> > >> Have you verifyed clustering is using unique multicast address and port. > >> Cluster multicast address should be unique and not used by any other > >> cluster. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Ashwin > >> On 07-Feb-2017 10:38 pm, "André Warnier (tomcat)" <a...@ice-sa.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> On 07.02.2017 17:20, Fady Haikal wrote: > >>> > >>>> Christopher, > >>>> For the first time > >>>> > >>> > >>> @Christopher : just to make sure you got that bit, buried below : the > >>> actual replication seems to work fine. The problem is only these > >>> "unsuccesful ping" messages in the log, which fill the log, and which > so > >>> far nobody has managed to find an explanation for. > >>> > >>> > >>>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Christopher Schultz > >>>> <ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >>>>> Hash: SHA256 > >>>>> > >>>>> Fady, > >>>>> > >>>>> On 2/7/17 10:53 AM, Fady Haikal wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> ProcessPID Protocol local address local port > >>>>>> Remote Address State Tomcat8.exe 8160 TCP > >>>>>> imal14-app24000 imal14-app1.albaraka.com.sdESTABLISHED > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Stupid question: was this working in the past, and it stopped > working? > >>>>> Or are you trying to get this working for the first time? > >>>>> > >>>>> - -chris > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Fady Haikal <fadyhai...@gmail.com> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Yes there is a ESTABLISHED connection, the replication of > >>>>>>> sessions is working fine (port 4000 is for tomcat cluster) but we > >>>>>>> also faced this error on the log file > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 5:44 PM, André Warnier (tomcat) > >>>>>>> <a...@ice-sa.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 07.02.2017 16:24, Fady Haikal wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>&g
Re: Operation has timed out
I am not sure if anyone has verified below. Have you verifyed clustering is using unique multicast address and port. Cluster multicast address should be unique and not used by any other cluster. Regards, Ashwin On 07-Feb-2017 10:38 pm, "André Warnier (tomcat)"wrote: > On 07.02.2017 17:20, Fady Haikal wrote: > >> Christopher, >> For the first time >> > > @Christopher : just to make sure you got that bit, buried below : the > actual replication seems to work fine. The problem is only these > "unsuccesful ping" messages in the log, which fill the log, and which so > far nobody has managed to find an explanation for. > > >> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Christopher Schultz >> wrote: >> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA256 >>> >>> Fady, >>> >>> On 2/7/17 10:53 AM, Fady Haikal wrote: >>> ProcessPID Protocol local address local port Remote Address State Tomcat8.exe 8160 TCP imal14-app24000 imal14-app1.albaraka.com.sdESTABLISHED >>> >>> Stupid question: was this working in the past, and it stopped working? >>> Or are you trying to get this working for the first time? >>> >>> - -chris >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Fady Haikal wrote: > Yes there is a ESTABLISHED connection, the replication of > sessions is working fine (port 4000 is for tomcat cluster) but we > also faced this error on the log file > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 5:44 PM, André Warnier (tomcat) > wrote: > >> On 07.02.2017 16:24, Fady Haikal wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi, telnet IP 4000 is working fine, i installed a tool for >>> network monitoring at the level of IP and Port and i didnt >>> see any disconnection, >>> >> >> >> but did you see a *connection* ? I mean, on the pinging node, >> if you use the Windows "netstat" program, for example as >> netstat -aon -p TCP you should see a list of connections in the >> ESTABLISHED state, of which one of the IP/ports should be your >> target IP:4000 (in the "remote" column). And on the pinged >> node, this port :4000 should be in the "local" column, in >> LISTEN mode (and also probably one in the ESTABLISHED state, if >> they agree.) >> >> Is that the case ? >> >> >> >> and yes i'm sure that no firewall is enabled. >> >>> >>> >>> I saw some strange think on the server that I have tried to >>> ping the multicast IP (228.0.0.4) and i get reply from >>> different IPs in the network, i don't know why and how i get >>> those IPs, after checking with the network team they told me >>> that those IPs are related to the SAN storage taking into >>> consideration that the Tomcat servers are not connected in >>> anyway to that SUN storage. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 4:51 PM, André Warnier (tomcat) >>> wrote: >>> Hi. This is for the Tomcat/Tribes experts on the list. I know nothing of Tribes, but the on-line documentation seems to say that the communication happens over TCP and that the protocol used is not encrypted. Fady previously tried a standard "ping" and a "telnet" between the two nodes, and that is the base for him mentioning that "there is no network disconnection" between the nodes. Nevertheless, the calling pinging node seems to say that it times out without getting a response fom the target node. There is evidently a contradiction there. So this could still be some kind of network issue. Considering that the protocol command for this "ping" should be known by someone here, would it not be possible to imagine a little program in some scripting language (or even java, God forbid), which would open a TCP channel with the target node IP/port, send such a "ping" message, wait for a response and report the result ? That would at least confirm/deny that the problem is with the network. The log below does not for example say if the error happens when opening the TCP communication channel, or after sending the ping message on it, (Of course, testing the TCP open could be done with "telnet IP 4000", but I don't know if Fady tried this). Maybe tribes also already contains some löw-level debugging options ? wireshark maybe another option, but it has quite a learning curve. And this is on Windows. By the way Fady, are you sure that your "Windows Firewall with Enhanced Security" is not just dropping TCP packets to/from port 40xx (or from "java.exe") ? There are some "network policies" there which can have
Re: Error in Tomcat 6.0.32
Shailesh, increase heap size of your JVM instance and try again. Regards, Ashwin On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 7:25 PM, André Warnier (tomcat)wrote: > Now really ? > What do you not understand in > > > java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space > > ? > > > > On 31.05.2016 15:35, Shailesh Jain wrote: > >> Hello All, >> Below is the error coming in tomcat6, can you pleaes advise what can be >> done to resolve the issue. >> SEVERE: Servlet.service() for servlet ComponentDispatcher threw exception >> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space >> May 27, 2016 11:27:58 AM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve >> invoke >> SEVERE: Servlet.service() for servlet jsp threw exception >> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space >> May 27, 2016 11:33:36 AM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve >> invoke >> SEVERE: Servlet.service() for servlet Redirect threw exception >> java.lang.IllegalStateException >> at >> org.apache.catalina.connector.ResponseFacade.sendError(ResponseFacade.java:407) >> at com.suncor.redirect.Redirect.doGet(Redirect.java:175) >> at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:617) >> at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717) >> at >> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290) >> at >> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206) >> at >> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233) >> at >> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191) >> at >> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127) >> at >> org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102) >> at >> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109) >> at >> org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:298) >> at >> org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11AprProcessor.process(Http11AprProcessor.java:864) >> at >> org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11AprProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11AprProtocol.java:579) >> at org.apache.tomcat.util.net >> .AprEndpoint$Worker.run(AprEndpoint.java:1665) >> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) Thanks Shailesh jain >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >