Re: ColdFusion10 custom mod_jk difference

2014-05-31 Thread Rainer Jung
On 08.04.2014 23:44, Doug Strick wrote: > We're moving from ColdFusion8 to CF10 where I work and ran into a strange > issue. We tried using mod_jk-1.2.39 and it compiled fine. We were able to > get the communication working, but ran into strange errors like below. > Adobe provides their own cust

Re: ColdFusion10 custom mod_jk difference

2014-04-10 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Doug, On 4/8/14, 3:44 PM, Doug Strick wrote: > We're moving from ColdFusion8 to CF10 where I work and ran into a > strange issue. We tried using mod_jk-1.2.39 and it compiled fine. > We were able to get the communication working, but ran into stran

Re: ColdFusion10 custom mod_jk difference

2014-04-08 Thread Doug Strick
I completely agree with you, but unfortunately am stuck with CF as the developers won't switch and the company already made an investment in licenses. On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:08 PM, john Matlock wrote: > >Recommendation: > > > > >Switch away from Adobe CF 10 to Railo (www.getrailo.org) > >

Re: ColdFusion10 custom mod_jk difference

2014-04-08 Thread john Matlock
Recommendation: Switch away from Adobe CF 10 to Railo (www.getrailo.org). On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Doug Strick wrote: > We're moving from ColdFusion8 to CF10 where I work and ran into a strange > issue. We tried using mod_jk-1.2.39 and it compiled fine. We were able to > get the commun

ColdFusion10 custom mod_jk difference

2014-04-08 Thread Doug Strick
We're moving from ColdFusion8 to CF10 where I work and ran into a strange issue. We tried using mod_jk-1.2.39 and it compiled fine. We were able to get the communication working, but ran into strange errors like below. Adobe provides their own customized version of mod_jk which appears to be bui