Re: [OT] Serialization

2010-10-10 Thread Wolfgang Orthuber
Sorry that I could not answer earlier, currently I am away from my working place. Concerning this topic I recommend to send future emails directly to my, because it is only indirectly connected with tomcat. As mentioned, details about this are described in http://www.orthuber.com/wpa.htm . It i

Re: [OT] Serialization

2010-10-07 Thread Pid
On 06/10/2010 11:55, Wolfgang Orthuber wrote: > This would allow to sort medical histories precisely and to learn > systematically from past experience. Only relative assessment is possible, no*? > So every patient who wants to share > his experiences in precisely searchable form, can get the op

Re: [OT] Serialization

2010-10-07 Thread Pid
On 06/10/2010 11:55, Wolfgang Orthuber wrote: > The build in serialization tool of java has probably high performance > (which is in the long run important for search), and needed not much > time for programming, therefore it was my initial choice. There's an assumption there, and some reasoning I

Re: [OT] Serialization

2010-10-06 Thread Wolfgang Orthuber
Chris, Not always it seems adequate to write to the mailing list - so you marked my question with [OT] which was a further hint for me to write to you directly. Concerning serialization I answered already on 04.10.2010. The build in serialization tool of java has probably high performance (w

Re: [OT] Serialization

2010-10-05 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wolfgang, (I'm cc'ing the tomcat-user mailing list in case others would like to read my response. Please try to keep things on the list rather than emailing contributors directly.) On 10/5/2010 9:34 AM, Wolfgang Orthuber wrote: > thanks for your deta

Re:[OT] Serialization

2010-10-04 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wolfgang, (Marking off-topic because this is a Java/JSP issue and not Tomcat-related. See below for responses.) On 10/4/2010 9:10 AM, Wolfgang Orthuber wrote: > my tomcat version is 5.5.17 Upgrade. > then all works fine, but if I use only read (on