Re: [us...@httpd] Problem with mod_headers ?

2009-01-12 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 André, André Warnier wrote: I am using a Tomcat java application which unfortunately sets the Content-Type response header wrongly : it says text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 instead of text/html; charset=iso-8859-2, and there is no way I can change

Re: [us...@httpd] Problem with mod_headers ?

2009-01-12 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 André, André Warnier wrote: - the only viable solution in my case is thus to make sure that the Tomcat servlet issues the correct Content-Type header in the first place. If the servlet itself cannot be modified, then a servlet filter wrapping

Re: [us...@httpd] Problem with mod_headers ?

2009-01-01 Thread André Warnier
Rainer Jung wrote: On 31.12.2008 10:08, André Warnier wrote: Juha Laiho wrote: [...] Thanks, Juha. That helps me think in another direction. Maybe indeed in this case the mod_headers module does not get a chance to modify the response headers, because it is added before the mod_jk module, and

Re: [us...@httpd] Problem with mod_headers ?

2008-12-31 Thread Juha Laiho
André Warnier wrote: As a separate question : how does Apache (or mod_jk) exactly arrange to do that (not allow mod_headers to change the response headers set by Tomcat) ? The answer may help me decide whether I can/want to try writing my own mod_perl response header modification handler (or

Re: [us...@httpd] Problem with mod_headers ?

2008-12-31 Thread André Warnier
Juha Laiho wrote: [...] Thanks, Juha. That helps me think in another direction. Maybe indeed in this case the mod_headers module does not get a chance to modify the response headers, because it is added before the mod_jk module, and mod_jk overrides it. It is worth investigating anyway, since

Re: [us...@httpd] Problem with mod_headers ?

2008-12-31 Thread Rainer Jung
On 31.12.2008 10:08, André Warnier wrote: Juha Laiho wrote: [...] Thanks, Juha. That helps me think in another direction. Maybe indeed in this case the mod_headers module does not get a chance to modify the response headers, because it is added before the mod_jk module, and mod_jk overrides it.

[us...@httpd] Problem with mod_headers ?

2008-12-30 Thread André Warnier
Hi. The following is verbatim what I posted earlier on the Apache user's list. I am reposting it here because I did not really get a satisfactory answer on the Apache httpd list, and because I know that mod_jk experts lurk around here. And maybe this has something to do with the fact that

Re: [us...@httpd] Problem with mod_headers ?

2008-12-30 Thread Gregor Schneider
André, when using mod_jk, Apache HTTPD will not change any headers sent from Tomcat, even if you use mod_headers. Since mod_jk is delegating the whole request to Tomcat, this behaviour is expected, though debatable. Writing a filter to change your headers in Tomcat is no big deal, the link

Re: [us...@httpd] Problem with mod_headers ?

2008-12-30 Thread André Warnier
Gregor Schneider wrote: André, when using mod_jk, Apache HTTPD will not change any headers sent from Tomcat, even if you use mod_headers. Since mod_jk is delegating the whole request to Tomcat, this behaviour is expected, though debatable. Writing a filter to change your headers in Tomcat is

Re: [us...@httpd] Problem with mod_headers ?

2008-12-30 Thread Gregor Schneider
Hi André, On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 10:25 PM, André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com wrote: My only doubt at this stage, is that if the wrapped servlet itself sets the (wrong) Content-Type header, it might overwrite the one I set before the doFilter(), no ? you might have to give it a try As a