Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-15 Thread André Warnier

For both threads :
Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x
and
mod_jk under RedHat ?

Here is apparently the deal with mod_jk and Redhat (quoted from my competent 
sysadmin) :

In the RedHat product Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (RHELS), there is no repository 
containing a pre-packaged mod_jk module.


To obtain such a package, the client has to purchase the separate RedHat package JBoss 
Enterprise Web Server, which contains mod_jk.


He adds (and I do not understand what that means, but someone else might):

'JBoss Enterprise Web Server is not a Channel that can be added to RHELS.'

I may comment on this later on, but for now, it seems that the alternatives for someone 
who for whatever reason wants/needs to stick with RHELS and the pre-packaged software that 
it contains, the alternatives to connect Apache and Tomcat are :

- use mod_proxy and mod_proxy_ajp
or
- use mod_proxy and mod_proxy_http
(which are part of Apache 2.x, which is available in RHELS)

or

purchase the additional RedHat product JBoss Enterprise Web Server, in which case you 
can also use the included mod_jk package.



For someone who wants to stick with RHELS, does not want to buy the additional JBoss 
Enterprise Web Server, but can/is allowed to install other packages, an additional 
possibility is to use mod_jk, after compiling it from source.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



RE: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-15 Thread Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2
Big thanks to Chris, Andre, and everyone else for all of the guidance!  I think 
I'm going to do this:

1.  Compile Apache 2.2.19 in /myuser/ space (since I don't have root or admin 
privileges).

2.  Ask the admin to do his part in taking the compiling code and installing it.

I have a question about doing this with mod_ssl, but I think it would be best 
for me to start a different thread with this.  Thanks again!

Jonathan


-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] 
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 2:37 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Jonathan,

On 7/14/2011 1:08 PM, Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2 wrote:
 Chris, something DID just dawn on me...
 
 I have my own account on that Linux server, though not with root 
 access or anything. Would it be possible for me to compile mod_jk.so 
 into my own space and then tell him where the mod_jk.so is?

Yes.

 If so, would the following steps be how I would generate mod_jk.so 
 (and forgive the newbieness of the question, please)?
 
 tar -xvzf tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src.tar.gz
 
 cd tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src/native/ # which apxs

The # which apxs was intended to be a command to determine the
location of Apache httpd's apxs program, which is a
configuration-dumping utility to help with building Apache httpd
modules. apxs if often found in /usr/sbin/apxs so Leon's post was using
that as an example:

 ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs --enable-api-compatibility

Replace /usr/sbin/apxs with whatever the result of which apxs is. If
that doesn't return anything, you may have to have your SA install the
Apache httpd development package or something. It might also be called
apxs2 (that's the case in my Debian Lenny environment).

Good luck,
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk4fN0kACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PD2ZwCfcQuD5WScbq+HJgCKTHZtY3JY
Ii0AoK8WtgF4SmXAemVGRmMde4f0K8P1
=HFWz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


RE: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-15 Thread Jeff Allison
Isn't mod_jk deprecated in favour of mod_ajp.
On Jul 15, 2011 10:15 PM, Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2 
jonathan.leffingwell@navy.mil wrote:
 Big thanks to Chris, Andre, and everyone else for all of the guidance! I
think I'm going to do this:

 1. Compile Apache 2.2.19 in /myuser/ space (since I don't have root or
admin privileges).

 2. Ask the admin to do his part in taking the compiling code and
installing it.

 I have a question about doing this with mod_ssl, but I think it would be
best for me to start a different thread with this. Thanks again!

 Jonathan


 -Original Message-
 From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
 Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 2:37 PM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Jonathan,

 On 7/14/2011 1:08 PM, Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2 wrote:
 Chris, something DID just dawn on me...

 I have my own account on that Linux server, though not with root
 access or anything. Would it be possible for me to compile mod_jk.so
 into my own space and then tell him where the mod_jk.so is?

 Yes.

 If so, would the following steps be how I would generate mod_jk.so
 (and forgive the newbieness of the question, please)?

 tar -xvzf tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src.tar.gz

 cd tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src/native/ # which apxs

 The # which apxs was intended to be a command to determine the
 location of Apache httpd's apxs program, which is a
 configuration-dumping utility to help with building Apache httpd
 modules. apxs if often found in /usr/sbin/apxs so Leon's post was using
 that as an example:

 ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs --enable-api-compatibility

 Replace /usr/sbin/apxs with whatever the result of which apxs is. If
 that doesn't return anything, you may have to have your SA install the
 Apache httpd development package or something. It might also be called
 apxs2 (that's the case in my Debian Lenny environment).

 Good luck,
 - -chris
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

 iEYEARECAAYFAk4fN0kACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PD2ZwCfcQuD5WScbq+HJgCKTHZtY3JY
 Ii0AoK8WtgF4SmXAemVGRmMde4f0K8P1
 =HFWz
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-15 Thread Rainer Jung
On 15.07.2011 14:20, Jeff Allison wrote:
 Isn't mod_jk deprecated in favour of mod_ajp.

No

Rainer

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



RE: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-15 Thread Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2
There is no apxs on the Linux server.  The S.A. confirmed this.  That file 
and nothing closely resembling it are found anywhere on the whole box.  Is it 
needed to compile mod_jk?



-Original Message-
From: Mark Eggers [mailto:its_toas...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 1:22 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

- Original Message -

 From: Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2 
 jonathan.leffingwell@navy.mil
 To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
 Cc: 
 Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 10:08 AM
 Subject: RE: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x
 
 Chris, something DID just dawn on me...
 
 I have my own account on that Linux server, though not with root access or 
 anything.  Would it be possible for me to compile mod_jk.so into my own space 
 and then tell him where the mod_jk.so is?  If so, would the following steps 
 be 
 how I would generate mod_jk.so (and forgive the newbieness of the 
 question, please)?
 
 tar -xvzf tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src.tar.gz
 
 cd tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src/native/ # which apxs 
 
 ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs --enable-api-compatibility 
 
 make 
 
 make install
 
 
 At this point, I think all I want to do is produce a functioning mod_jk.so 
 and 
 let him put it into the modules directory.  Would this do it?
 
 Thanks again!
 
 JL
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] 
 Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 12:34 PM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x
 
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Leon,
 
 On 7/12/2011 7:42 PM, Leon Kolchinsky wrote:
  Go to http://tomcat.apache.org/download-connectors.cgi and download
  the source code:
 
  # tar -xvzf tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src.tar.gz
 
  Read docs/webserver_howto/apache.html or native/BUILDING.txt for
  options.
 
  # cd tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src/native/ # which apxs # ./configure
  --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs --enable-api-compatibility # make # make
  install
 
 All that as root? Hmm.
 
 Also, not everyone has a C compiler, especially on a production machine.
 (The answer, of course, is to build somewhere else and upload.)
 
 Jonathan, I understand that you want convenience, but there are several
 factors to consider, here:
 
 1. Unless you download a binary from a trusted source (i.e. not anyone
    on this list, but something like something.apache.org, or from your
    distro's package manager), you should consider yourself compromised.
 
 2. If you build your own mod_jk, you know it will work with your exact
    environment. No weird problems with slight version mismatches between
    httpd version or other libraries. No questions about which
    architecture's files you need to download, etc.
 
 3. Building mod_jk from source is relatively trivial. See above. Most
    Linux distros some with a C compiler by default, and all of them
    can trivially install gcc.
 
 Consider trying it.
 
 Recently, the Tomcat team decided to stop providing binaries for *NIX
 platforms because of the above (maybe that was just for tcnative, but I
 wouldn't be surprised if the policy is now to avoid rolling binaries for
 any non-Java components).
 
 Why? Because if we wanted to provide binaries for, say, mod_jk, we need
 to support (at least) two architectures: x86 and x86_64. Also, there are
 4 major versions of Apache httpd: 1.3, 2.0, 2.2, and 2.4. Sometimes,
 even httpd patch level can affect compatibility (though it really
 shouldn't) or maybe it was built against 2.2.11 but the user has 2.2.13
 and wants to know why no binary?.
 
 We cannot possibly provide enough binaries to make everyone happy. Since
 it's so easy to build mod_jk, we ask users in *NIX environments to just
 do it.
 
 We do provide binaries for both 32- and 64-bit Microsoft Windows
 environments for Apache httpd, Microsoft IIS and (wtf?) Netscape,
 because those folks rarely have compilers handy.
 
 If you have any trouble building mod_jk, please don't hesitate to come
 back for help.
 
 - -chris


If all the tools are available on the production system (compiler, libraries), 
then you do this as a normal user:

myuser$ tar -xvzf tomcat-connectors-1.2.32-src.tar.gz
myuser$ cd tomcat-connectors-1.2.32-src/native/
myuser$ which apxs  
myuser$ ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs --enable-api-compatibility 
myuser$ make 


(where myuser$ is whatever prompt you have for your user id).

Then you tell the system admin where the location is (probably now in 
/home/myuser/tomcat-connectors-1.2.32-src/native/), and have him do as root:

# cd /home/myuser/tomcat-connectors-1.2.32-src/native/
# make install

That should get the mod_jk.so installed. The administrator will then have to 
configure it (see tomcat-connectors-1.2.32-src/conf for examples), and finally 
restart the Apache HTPPD server.

Hopefully the administrator should be able to do that.

. . . . just my two cents

Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-15 Thread Mark Eggers
- Original Message -

 From: Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2 
 jonathan.leffingwell@navy.mil
 To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org; Mark Eggers 
 its_toas...@yahoo.com
 Cc: 
 Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 7:53 AM
 Subject: RE: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x
 
 There is no apxs on the Linux server.  The S.A. confirmed this.  
 That file and nothing closely resembling it are found anywhere on the whole 
 box.  Is it needed to compile mod_jk?

Yes, and you will need a collection of other include files and libraries that 
are probably not installed on your system.

Building mod_jk on a RedHat system is slightly complicated by the fact that 
RedHat breaks up packages.

For example, if you install the apr and apr-util packages, you might expect to 
have all the tools required to build software with Apache's portable runtime 
libraries.

You don't. You will need to install apr-devel and apr-util-devel in order to 
build other software using these libraries. The apr and apr-util packages 
contain only what is required to run software built with these packages.

Building mod_jk on RedHat (at least Fedora), requires a collection of 
development tools and packages. At the top of the requirements chain, these are:

1. httpd-devel
This package provides /usr/sbin/apxs among other things.

2. apr-devel
The include files for building software with the apache portable runtime 
libraries.

3. apr-util-devel
The include files for the utilities library of the apache portable runtime 
libraries

4. Java JDK
Note, the JRE will NOT work. You should download and install this from Oracle, 
although there are ways to get this installed using the RedHat package manager. 
There are include files in $JAVA_HOME/include and $JAVA_HOME/include/linux that 
you will need.

If yum is set up properly (at least on Fedora), the dependencies for the first 
three packages will be pulled in when you request the following (as root):

yum install httpd-devel apr-devel apr-util-devel

In part, you should see the following get installed.

perl (if not installed already - can't imagine why it wouldn't be)
pkgconfig
db4-devel (which requires db4 and db4-cxx)
expat-devel (which requires expat)
openldap-devel (which requires openldap,cyrus-sasl-devel)

cyrus-sasl-devel requires a set of packages as well.
cyrus-sasl
cyrus-sasl-lib

Hopefully everything else should be in place on your system.

Again, in a sane world yum will pull in the required dependencies if you just 
do the following as root:

yum install httpd-devel apr-devel apr-util-devel

Yum will come back with a list of additional packages it needs to install in 
order to meet the requirements.

This is how it works on a Fedora system, which is basically the beta testing 
environment for RedHat EL releases.

For mod_ssl, you shouldn't have to build it. At least on a Fedora system, 
mod_ssl is provided by the mod_ssl package.

Installing that as root with:

yum install mod_ssl

will bring in the openssl package. You will need the openssl package and the 
openssl-devel package in order to build the Tomcat native libraries packaged in 
$CATALINA_HOME/bin/tomcat-native.tar.gz.

Hopefully between you and your system admin, you can decipher the above mail 
message.

. . . . just my two cents.

/mde/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-14 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Leon,

On 7/12/2011 7:42 PM, Leon Kolchinsky wrote:
 Go to http://tomcat.apache.org/download-connectors.cgi and download
 the source code:
 
 # tar -xvzf tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src.tar.gz
 
 Read docs/webserver_howto/apache.html or native/BUILDING.txt for
 options.
 
 # cd tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src/native/ # which apxs # ./configure
 --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs --enable-api-compatibility # make # make
 install

All that as root? Hmm.

Also, not everyone has a C compiler, especially on a production machine.
(The answer, of course, is to build somewhere else and upload.)

Jonathan, I understand that you want convenience, but there are several
factors to consider, here:

1. Unless you download a binary from a trusted source (i.e. not anyone
   on this list, but something like something.apache.org, or from your
   distro's package manager), you should consider yourself compromised.

2. If you build your own mod_jk, you know it will work with your exact
   environment. No weird problems with slight version mismatches between
   httpd version or other libraries. No questions about which
   architecture's files you need to download, etc.

3. Building mod_jk from source is relatively trivial. See above. Most
   Linux distros some with a C compiler by default, and all of them
   can trivially install gcc.

Consider trying it.

Recently, the Tomcat team decided to stop providing binaries for *NIX
platforms because of the above (maybe that was just for tcnative, but I
wouldn't be surprised if the policy is now to avoid rolling binaries for
any non-Java components).

Why? Because if we wanted to provide binaries for, say, mod_jk, we need
to support (at least) two architectures: x86 and x86_64. Also, there are
4 major versions of Apache httpd: 1.3, 2.0, 2.2, and 2.4. Sometimes,
even httpd patch level can affect compatibility (though it really
shouldn't) or maybe it was built against 2.2.11 but the user has 2.2.13
and wants to know why no binary?.

We cannot possibly provide enough binaries to make everyone happy. Since
it's so easy to build mod_jk, we ask users in *NIX environments to just
do it.

We do provide binaries for both 32- and 64-bit Microsoft Windows
environments for Apache httpd, Microsoft IIS and (wtf?) Netscape,
because those folks rarely have compilers handy.

If you have any trouble building mod_jk, please don't hesitate to come
back for help.

- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk4fGnQACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PCRlgCfd41tx9q8BpKfY35elKUCmokO
b9oAoIC3QamvoAhLvtageSz0/zQzEVxE
=0myN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



RE: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-14 Thread Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2
Thanks, Chris.  Unfortunately, I don't have root access, and I know just enough 
Linux to be dangerous!  LOL!  The Linux S.A. doesn't know anything about 
compiling (don't get me started on THAT), so he was asking if there were a 
binary module to drop into the modules folder.  I was hoping to avoid having to 
learn how to do his job FOR him.  :-D

JL


-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] 
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 12:34 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Leon,

On 7/12/2011 7:42 PM, Leon Kolchinsky wrote:
 Go to http://tomcat.apache.org/download-connectors.cgi and download
 the source code:
 
 # tar -xvzf tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src.tar.gz
 
 Read docs/webserver_howto/apache.html or native/BUILDING.txt for
 options.
 
 # cd tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src/native/ # which apxs # ./configure
 --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs --enable-api-compatibility # make # make
 install

All that as root? Hmm.

Also, not everyone has a C compiler, especially on a production machine.
(The answer, of course, is to build somewhere else and upload.)

Jonathan, I understand that you want convenience, but there are several
factors to consider, here:

1. Unless you download a binary from a trusted source (i.e. not anyone
   on this list, but something like something.apache.org, or from your
   distro's package manager), you should consider yourself compromised.

2. If you build your own mod_jk, you know it will work with your exact
   environment. No weird problems with slight version mismatches between
   httpd version or other libraries. No questions about which
   architecture's files you need to download, etc.

3. Building mod_jk from source is relatively trivial. See above. Most
   Linux distros some with a C compiler by default, and all of them
   can trivially install gcc.

Consider trying it.

Recently, the Tomcat team decided to stop providing binaries for *NIX
platforms because of the above (maybe that was just for tcnative, but I
wouldn't be surprised if the policy is now to avoid rolling binaries for
any non-Java components).

Why? Because if we wanted to provide binaries for, say, mod_jk, we need
to support (at least) two architectures: x86 and x86_64. Also, there are
4 major versions of Apache httpd: 1.3, 2.0, 2.2, and 2.4. Sometimes,
even httpd patch level can affect compatibility (though it really
shouldn't) or maybe it was built against 2.2.11 but the user has 2.2.13
and wants to know why no binary?.

We cannot possibly provide enough binaries to make everyone happy. Since
it's so easy to build mod_jk, we ask users in *NIX environments to just
do it.

We do provide binaries for both 32- and 64-bit Microsoft Windows
environments for Apache httpd, Microsoft IIS and (wtf?) Netscape,
because those folks rarely have compilers handy.

If you have any trouble building mod_jk, please don't hesitate to come
back for help.

- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk4fGnQACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PCRlgCfd41tx9q8BpKfY35elKUCmokO
b9oAoIC3QamvoAhLvtageSz0/zQzEVxE
=0myN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


RE: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-14 Thread Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2
Chris, something DID just dawn on me...

I have my own account on that Linux server, though not with root access or 
anything.  Would it be possible for me to compile mod_jk.so into my own space 
and then tell him where the mod_jk.so is?  If so, would the following steps be 
how I would generate mod_jk.so (and forgive the newbieness of the question, 
please)?

tar -xvzf tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src.tar.gz

cd tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src/native/ # which apxs 

./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs --enable-api-compatibility 

make 

make install


At this point, I think all I want to do is produce a functioning mod_jk.so and 
let him put it into the modules directory.  Would this do it?

Thanks again!

JL


-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] 
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 12:34 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Leon,

On 7/12/2011 7:42 PM, Leon Kolchinsky wrote:
 Go to http://tomcat.apache.org/download-connectors.cgi and download
 the source code:
 
 # tar -xvzf tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src.tar.gz
 
 Read docs/webserver_howto/apache.html or native/BUILDING.txt for
 options.
 
 # cd tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src/native/ # which apxs # ./configure
 --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs --enable-api-compatibility # make # make
 install

All that as root? Hmm.

Also, not everyone has a C compiler, especially on a production machine.
(The answer, of course, is to build somewhere else and upload.)

Jonathan, I understand that you want convenience, but there are several
factors to consider, here:

1. Unless you download a binary from a trusted source (i.e. not anyone
   on this list, but something like something.apache.org, or from your
   distro's package manager), you should consider yourself compromised.

2. If you build your own mod_jk, you know it will work with your exact
   environment. No weird problems with slight version mismatches between
   httpd version or other libraries. No questions about which
   architecture's files you need to download, etc.

3. Building mod_jk from source is relatively trivial. See above. Most
   Linux distros some with a C compiler by default, and all of them
   can trivially install gcc.

Consider trying it.

Recently, the Tomcat team decided to stop providing binaries for *NIX
platforms because of the above (maybe that was just for tcnative, but I
wouldn't be surprised if the policy is now to avoid rolling binaries for
any non-Java components).

Why? Because if we wanted to provide binaries for, say, mod_jk, we need
to support (at least) two architectures: x86 and x86_64. Also, there are
4 major versions of Apache httpd: 1.3, 2.0, 2.2, and 2.4. Sometimes,
even httpd patch level can affect compatibility (though it really
shouldn't) or maybe it was built against 2.2.11 but the user has 2.2.13
and wants to know why no binary?.

We cannot possibly provide enough binaries to make everyone happy. Since
it's so easy to build mod_jk, we ask users in *NIX environments to just
do it.

We do provide binaries for both 32- and 64-bit Microsoft Windows
environments for Apache httpd, Microsoft IIS and (wtf?) Netscape,
because those folks rarely have compilers handy.

If you have any trouble building mod_jk, please don't hesitate to come
back for help.

- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk4fGnQACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PCRlgCfd41tx9q8BpKfY35elKUCmokO
b9oAoIC3QamvoAhLvtageSz0/zQzEVxE
=0myN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-14 Thread Mark Eggers
- Original Message -

 From: Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2 
 jonathan.leffingwell@navy.mil
 To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
 Cc: 
 Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 10:08 AM
 Subject: RE: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x
 
 Chris, something DID just dawn on me...
 
 I have my own account on that Linux server, though not with root access or 
 anything.  Would it be possible for me to compile mod_jk.so into my own space 
 and then tell him where the mod_jk.so is?  If so, would the following steps 
 be 
 how I would generate mod_jk.so (and forgive the newbieness of the 
 question, please)?
 
 tar -xvzf tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src.tar.gz
 
 cd tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src/native/ # which apxs 
 
 ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs --enable-api-compatibility 
 
 make 
 
 make install
 
 
 At this point, I think all I want to do is produce a functioning mod_jk.so 
 and 
 let him put it into the modules directory.  Would this do it?
 
 Thanks again!
 
 JL
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] 
 Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 12:34 PM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x
 
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Leon,
 
 On 7/12/2011 7:42 PM, Leon Kolchinsky wrote:
  Go to http://tomcat.apache.org/download-connectors.cgi and download
  the source code:
 
  # tar -xvzf tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src.tar.gz
 
  Read docs/webserver_howto/apache.html or native/BUILDING.txt for
  options.
 
  # cd tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src/native/ # which apxs # ./configure
  --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs --enable-api-compatibility # make # make
  install
 
 All that as root? Hmm.
 
 Also, not everyone has a C compiler, especially on a production machine.
 (The answer, of course, is to build somewhere else and upload.)
 
 Jonathan, I understand that you want convenience, but there are several
 factors to consider, here:
 
 1. Unless you download a binary from a trusted source (i.e. not anyone
    on this list, but something like something.apache.org, or from your
    distro's package manager), you should consider yourself compromised.
 
 2. If you build your own mod_jk, you know it will work with your exact
    environment. No weird problems with slight version mismatches between
    httpd version or other libraries. No questions about which
    architecture's files you need to download, etc.
 
 3. Building mod_jk from source is relatively trivial. See above. Most
    Linux distros some with a C compiler by default, and all of them
    can trivially install gcc.
 
 Consider trying it.
 
 Recently, the Tomcat team decided to stop providing binaries for *NIX
 platforms because of the above (maybe that was just for tcnative, but I
 wouldn't be surprised if the policy is now to avoid rolling binaries for
 any non-Java components).
 
 Why? Because if we wanted to provide binaries for, say, mod_jk, we need
 to support (at least) two architectures: x86 and x86_64. Also, there are
 4 major versions of Apache httpd: 1.3, 2.0, 2.2, and 2.4. Sometimes,
 even httpd patch level can affect compatibility (though it really
 shouldn't) or maybe it was built against 2.2.11 but the user has 2.2.13
 and wants to know why no binary?.
 
 We cannot possibly provide enough binaries to make everyone happy. Since
 it's so easy to build mod_jk, we ask users in *NIX environments to just
 do it.
 
 We do provide binaries for both 32- and 64-bit Microsoft Windows
 environments for Apache httpd, Microsoft IIS and (wtf?) Netscape,
 because those folks rarely have compilers handy.
 
 If you have any trouble building mod_jk, please don't hesitate to come
 back for help.
 
 - -chris


If all the tools are available on the production system (compiler, libraries), 
then you do this as a normal user:

myuser$ tar -xvzf tomcat-connectors-1.2.32-src.tar.gz
myuser$ cd tomcat-connectors-1.2.32-src/native/
myuser$ which apxs  
myuser$ ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs --enable-api-compatibility 
myuser$ make 


(where myuser$ is whatever prompt you have for your user id).

Then you tell the system admin where the location is (probably now in 
/home/myuser/tomcat-connectors-1.2.32-src/native/), and have him do as root:

# cd /home/myuser/tomcat-connectors-1.2.32-src/native/
# make install

That should get the mod_jk.so installed. The administrator will then have to 
configure it (see tomcat-connectors-1.2.32-src/conf for examples), and finally 
restart the Apache HTPPD server.

Hopefully the administrator should be able to do that.

. . . . just my two cents
/mde/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-14 Thread André Warnier
As things happen, I am just in the process of trying to locate a RedHat mod_jk package for 
a client of mine, whose admin also does not seem to find it in RHEL6.

See the other thread entitled mod_jk under RedHat ? for some recent 
interesting answers.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



RE: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-14 Thread Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2
André, if you would be so kind as to let me know what you find, I would greatly 
appreciate it.  I will watch the other thread, too.  :)


-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 1:49 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

As things happen, I am just in the process of trying to locate a RedHat mod_jk 
package for 
a client of mine, whose admin also does not seem to find it in RHEL6.
See the other thread entitled mod_jk under RedHat ? for some recent 
interesting answers.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-14 Thread André Warnier

Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2 wrote:

André, if you would be so kind as to let me know what you find, I would greatly 
appreciate it.  I will watch the other thread, too.  :)

Well, according to the one and the same Mark Eggers who also provided your last response, 
the answer seems to be a package named mod_jk-ap20-1.2.31-1.ep5.el4.x86_64.rpm or similar.

But it may not be located in the main RHEL6 software repository.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-14 Thread André Warnier

André Warnier wrote:

Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2 wrote:
André, if you would be so kind as to let me know what you find, I 
would greatly appreciate it.  I will watch the other thread, too.  :)


Well, according to the one and the same Mark Eggers who also provided 
your last response, the answer seems to be a package named 
mod_jk-ap20-1.2.31-1.ep5.el4.x86_64.rpm or similar.

But it may not be located in the main RHEL6 software repository.


Addendum :
If you can wait until next Tuesday night 19/7, I will certainly know by then.
On that day, I have to go on-site precisely to install Apache/mod_jk/Tomcat onto a RHEL6 
new system, and I will have access to all RHEL6 repositories, with a competent sysadmin to 
help me (he just does not know mod_jk).

So if it can be found, we will.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-14 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Jonathan,

On 7/14/2011 1:08 PM, Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2 wrote:
 Chris, something DID just dawn on me...
 
 I have my own account on that Linux server, though not with root 
 access or anything. Would it be possible for me to compile mod_jk.so 
 into my own space and then tell him where the mod_jk.so is?

Yes.

 If so, would the following steps be how I would generate mod_jk.so 
 (and forgive the newbieness of the question, please)?
 
 tar -xvzf tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src.tar.gz
 
 cd tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src/native/ # which apxs

The # which apxs was intended to be a command to determine the
location of Apache httpd's apxs program, which is a
configuration-dumping utility to help with building Apache httpd
modules. apxs if often found in /usr/sbin/apxs so Leon's post was using
that as an example:

 ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs --enable-api-compatibility

Replace /usr/sbin/apxs with whatever the result of which apxs is. If
that doesn't return anything, you may have to have your SA install the
Apache httpd development package or something. It might also be called
apxs2 (that's the case in my Debian Lenny environment).

Good luck,
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk4fN0kACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PD2ZwCfcQuD5WScbq+HJgCKTHZtY3JY
Ii0AoK8WtgF4SmXAemVGRmMde4f0K8P1
=HFWz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-14 Thread Mark Eggers
- Original Message -

 From: Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net
 To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
 Cc: 
 Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 11:36 AM
 Subject: Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x
 
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Jonathan,
 
 On 7/14/2011 1:08 PM, Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2 wrote:
  Chris, something DID just dawn on me...
 
  I have my own account on that Linux server, though not with root 
  access or anything. Would it be possible for me to compile mod_jk.so 
  into my own space and then tell him where the mod_jk.so is?
 
 Yes.
 
  If so, would the following steps be how I would generate mod_jk.so 
  (and forgive the newbieness of the question, please)?
 
  tar -xvzf tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src.tar.gz
 
  cd tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src/native/ # which apxs
 
 The # which apxs was intended to be a command to determine the
 location of Apache httpd's apxs program, which is a
 configuration-dumping utility to help with building Apache httpd
 modules. apxs if often found in /usr/sbin/apxs so Leon's post was using
 that as an example:
 
  ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs --enable-api-compatibility
 
 Replace /usr/sbin/apxs with whatever the result of which apxs is. If
 that doesn't return anything, you may have to have your SA install the
 Apache httpd development package or something. It might also be called
 apxs2 (that's the case in my Debian Lenny environment).
 
 Good luck,
 - -chris


An addendum concerning building mod_jk on a RedHat based system:

RedHat often (always?) splits libraries from their associated include files and 
development resources. It really doesn't save a lot of space, so I guess the 
only reason is to create a clean production (read, can't build software here) 
environment.

In order to build mod_jk on Fedora (and probably CentOS, RedHat EL), you'll 
need to have the following installed (plus the normal development tools).

httpd-devel (provides /usr/sbin/apxs
apr-devel (provides the appropriate include files)
apr (required by apr-devel)
apr-util-devel (required by httpd-devel)
apr-util (required by apr-util)

There are other requirements buried in the list above, but if your admin 
installed these yum should pull in the requirements.

It's good to have a development system that mirrors the software versions 
running on the production system, with the addition of all the development 
libraries and tools.

. . . . just my two cents.

/mde/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-14 Thread Leon Kolchinsky
Hi,

Hmm, I didn't know that you're not managing this box ;)
I'm actually a Linux SysAdmin and not a big specialist in mod_jk ;)
What version of RedHat it is?
What application do you want to run on Tomcat behind Apache Httpd?

If you want I could help your SysAdmin with compilation and basic
configuration.

Cheers,
Leon Kolchinsky



On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 03:03, Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2
jonathan.leffingwell@navy.mil wrote:

 Thanks, Chris.  Unfortunately, I don't have root access, and I know just
 enough Linux to be dangerous!  LOL!  The Linux S.A. doesn't know anything
 about compiling (don't get me started on THAT), so he was asking if there
 were a binary module to drop into the modules folder.  I was hoping to avoid
 having to learn how to do his job FOR him.  :-D

 JL


 -Original Message-
 From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
 Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 12:34 PM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Leon,

 On 7/12/2011 7:42 PM, Leon Kolchinsky wrote:
  Go to http://tomcat.apache.org/download-connectors.cgi and download
  the source code:
 
  # tar -xvzf tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src.tar.gz
 
  Read docs/webserver_howto/apache.html or native/BUILDING.txt for
  options.
 
  # cd tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src/native/ # which apxs # ./configure
  --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs --enable-api-compatibility # make # make
  install

 All that as root? Hmm.

 Also, not everyone has a C compiler, especially on a production machine.
 (The answer, of course, is to build somewhere else and upload.)

 Jonathan, I understand that you want convenience, but there are several
 factors to consider, here:

 1. Unless you download a binary from a trusted source (i.e. not anyone
   on this list, but something like something.apache.org, or from your
   distro's package manager), you should consider yourself compromised.

 2. If you build your own mod_jk, you know it will work with your exact
   environment. No weird problems with slight version mismatches between
   httpd version or other libraries. No questions about which
   architecture's files you need to download, etc.

 3. Building mod_jk from source is relatively trivial. See above. Most
   Linux distros some with a C compiler by default, and all of them
   can trivially install gcc.

 Consider trying it.

 Recently, the Tomcat team decided to stop providing binaries for *NIX
 platforms because of the above (maybe that was just for tcnative, but I
 wouldn't be surprised if the policy is now to avoid rolling binaries for
 any non-Java components).

 Why? Because if we wanted to provide binaries for, say, mod_jk, we need
 to support (at least) two architectures: x86 and x86_64. Also, there are
 4 major versions of Apache httpd: 1.3, 2.0, 2.2, and 2.4. Sometimes,
 even httpd patch level can affect compatibility (though it really
 shouldn't) or maybe it was built against 2.2.11 but the user has 2.2.13
 and wants to know why no binary?.

 We cannot possibly provide enough binaries to make everyone happy. Since
 it's so easy to build mod_jk, we ask users in *NIX environments to just
 do it.

 We do provide binaries for both 32- and 64-bit Microsoft Windows
 environments for Apache httpd, Microsoft IIS and (wtf?) Netscape,
 because those folks rarely have compilers handy.

 If you have any trouble building mod_jk, please don't hesitate to come
 back for help.

 - -chris
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

 iEYEARECAAYFAk4fGnQACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PCRlgCfd41tx9q8BpKfY35elKUCmokO
 b9oAoIC3QamvoAhLvtageSz0/zQzEVxE
 =0myN
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org




Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-12 Thread Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2
I don't know the first thing about compiling on Linux.  I just want to drop a 
compiled mod_jk.so into the modules directory.  Where can I find the binary, 
not the source?  Thanks!



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-12 Thread André Warnier

Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2 wrote:

I don't know the first thing about compiling on Linux.  I just want to drop a 
compiled mod_jk.so into the modules directory.  Where can I find the binary, 
not the source?  Thanks!


What kind of Linux ?

explanation: most Linux distributions (RedHat, Suse, Debian, Ubuntu,..) have what is 
called a software package manager utility, which is a special tool to install software 
on the system.  It will usually get the desired binary modules, already compiled and 
configured, from some repository (often on the web), and install it for you.

It is the easiest and quickest way of installing software on Linux systems.

For example, if your system is a Debian or Ubuntu Linux, the following command would 
download and install mod_jk :


apt-get install libapache2-mod-jk


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



RE: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-12 Thread Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2
Thanks for the reply, André.

It is Red Hat Linux.


-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 2:12 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2 wrote:
 I don't know the first thing about compiling on Linux.  I just want to drop a 
 compiled mod_jk.so into the modules directory.  Where can I find the binary, 
 not the source?  Thanks!
 
What kind of Linux ?

explanation: most Linux distributions (RedHat, Suse, Debian, Ubuntu,..) have 
what is 
called a software package manager utility, which is a special tool to install 
software 
on the system.  It will usually get the desired binary modules, already 
compiled and 
configured, from some repository (often on the web), and install it for you.
It is the easiest and quickest way of installing software on Linux systems.

For example, if your system is a Debian or Ubuntu Linux, the following command 
would 
download and install mod_jk :

apt-get install libapache2-mod-jk


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-12 Thread Leon Kolchinsky
For God's sake,

Go to http://tomcat.apache.org/download-connectors.cgi and download the
source code:

# tar -xvzf tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src.tar.gz

Read docs/webserver_howto/apache.html or native/BUILDING.txt for options.

# cd tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src/native/
# which apxs
# ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs --enable-api-compatibility
# make
# make install

Cheers,
Leon Kolchinsky



On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 05:03, Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2
jonathan.leffingwell@navy.mil wrote:

 Thanks for the reply, André.

 It is Red Hat Linux.


 -Original Message-
 From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 2:12 PM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

 Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2 wrote:
  I don't know the first thing about compiling on Linux.  I just want to
 drop a compiled mod_jk.so into the modules directory.  Where can I find the
 binary, not the source?  Thanks!
 
 What kind of Linux ?

 explanation: most Linux distributions (RedHat, Suse, Debian, Ubuntu,..)
 have what is
 called a software package manager utility, which is a special tool to
 install software
 on the system.  It will usually get the desired binary modules, already
 compiled and
 configured, from some repository (often on the web), and install it for
 you.
 It is the easiest and quickest way of installing software on Linux systems.

 For example, if your system is a Debian or Ubuntu Linux, the following
 command would
 download and install mod_jk :

 apt-get install libapache2-mod-jk


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org