> From: albrecht andrzejewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I think tomcat stand alone is
> -> easier to deploy.
> And that's all.
There are also fewer things to fail, and a smaller learning curve for
your system administrators (if they don't already know Apache httpd and
the JK connector).
> I th
Quoting Peter Crowther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
What are you doing that doesn't just need a vanilla Tomcat?
Peter... I plan to have a box, and I just think about pro and cons...
I think tomcat stand alone is
-> easier to deploy.
And that's all.
I think apache as a front end is a more flexible a
On 9/21/07, Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe mod_proxy_ajp requires Apache httpd 2.2, right?
Yep. But it's definitely less work to set up, if you don't need to split
static and dynamic content.
--
Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hassan,
Hassan Schroeder wrote:
> On 9/21/07, Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The only supported Tomcat web server connector is mod_jk
>
> There's mod_proxy_ajp and mod_proxy_http, eh?
Aah, forgive me. I tend to think of mod_proxy_
On 9/21/07, Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> are you sure you even /need/ Apache httpd?
I concur with that, but...
> The only supported Tomcat web server connector is mod_jk
There's mod_proxy_ajp and mod_proxy_http, eh?
--
Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jagadeesh,
Tata, Jagadeesh wrote:
> I installed tomcat 6.0.13 on Solaris SPARC. Which is the better (suited)
> version of Apache and Apache connector for installed Tomcat?
The version of Apache httpd you choose is up to you and depends more on
your o
> From: Tata, Jagadeesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I installed tomcat 6.0.13 on Solaris SPARC. Which is the
> better (suited)
> version of Apache and Apache connector for installed Tomcat?
If you don't already have Apache on the box, please ask yourself this
question first:
"Why do I need Apac
