Just a thought from someone who knows nothing more than the contents of this
thread about the issue.
Would it make sense to only cache classes within a jar? i.e. empty the cache
when moving on to scan the next jar?
Possibly one might get enough performance benefit from intra-jar class
hierarch
2012/4/13 :
>
> The specification requires that every class and its hierarchy is scanned for
> annotations when the web app start. It was the Spring folks complaining about
> the slow start time when we didn't cache anything during the scan process.
>
> As I have said before:
> - If you don't ne
s List
>Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 6:50 AM
>Subject: Re: 7.0.25 to 7.0.27 requires -Xmx32m to go to -Xmx512m
>
>
>
>Pid wrote:
>
>>On 11/04/2012 03:47, Peter wrote:
>>> hey Christopher,
>>>
>>> the app I used that uncovered the issue is
into ram during scanning. In 7.0.25 - I could
start a "typical" Spring application in 32mb. 7.0.27 requires 512mb?
- Peter
From: Mark Thomas
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 6:50 AM
Subject: Re: 7.0.25 to 7.0.27 requires -Xmx32
Pid wrote:
>On 11/04/2012 03:47, Peter wrote:
>> hey Christopher,
>>
>> the app I used that uncovered the issue is one I use exclusively to
>validate tomcat releases;) it is a "hello world" style app using
>spring/servlet3.0. it has simple spring aop point cutting via jamon ,
>simple spring jm
On 11/04/2012 03:47, Peter wrote:
> hey Christopher,
>
> the app I used that uncovered the issue is one I use exclusively to validate
> tomcat releases;) it is a "hello world" style app using spring/servlet3.0. it
> has simple spring aop point cutting via jamon , simple spring jms (active mq)
>
hey Christopher,
the app I used that uncovered the issue is one I use exclusively to validate
tomcat releases;) it is a "hello world" style app using spring/servlet3.0. it
has simple spring aop point cutting via jamon , simple spring jms (active mq)
simple spring jaxrs, simple spring jaxws, sim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter,
On 4/10/12 12:45 PM, peter nightingale wrote:
> I recently updated from 7.0.25. I was able to start with -Xmx32m.
> After getting 7.0.27 - I ended up needing to go all the way to
> -Xmx512m. Note that the OOM only occured on startup. After star
