-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid,
On 11/10/2010 3:51 AM, Pid wrote:
> finally {
> DB.close(rs);
> DB.close(ps);
> DB.close(cn);
> }
I've gone further in our code:
DB.close(cn, ps, rs);
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sasidhar,
On 11/10/2010 3:29 AM, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
> Sorry for that. I changed it 300 seconds.
Perhaps you could post your entire configuration. It stops us from
asking too many questions, and generally gets right to the problem.
- -chris
--
When I get this problem, I tried the query in DB manually
by this query *select count(*) from v$process;*
*
*
The count some times very less, like if total connections are 200 it shows *
*
some times 60,40,162 like this.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 10/11/2010 09:02
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Pid wrote:
> On 04/11/2010 12:04, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
> > dataSource = ConnectionUtil.getDataSource();
> > }
>
> Is the class you posted the only DAO? Could the leak be from another
> class?
>
Some other DAOs are there. Which takes more than removeAbandone
On 04/11/2010 12:04, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
> dataSource = ConnectionUtil.getDataSource();
> }
Is the class you posted the only DAO? Could the leak be from another class?
Can you post ConnectionUtil.java?
p
0x62590808.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: Ope
On 04/11/2010 07:50, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
> We are using struts and following DAO pattern.
>
> This is the code
>
>
> public String getCountryName(long ipSum){
> String name = null;
>Connection connection = null;
>PreparedStatement pstmt = null;
>ResultSet rs
On 10/11/2010 09:02, Pid wrote:
> On 04/11/2010 12:04, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
>> dataSource = ConnectionUtil.getDataSource();
>> }
>
> Is the class you posted the only DAO? Could the leak be from another class?
>
> Can you post ConnectionUtil.java?
Given the SQL seen so far and that some que
On 10/11/2010 09:41, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
> private static DataSource dataSource;
>
Getting the DataSource shouldn't be an expensive operation, so
'optimising' by retaining a static reference to it doesn't make much
sense.
Try just getting a fresh DataSource every time - your DB queries are
On 04/11/2010 15:41, Mikolaj Rydzewski wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 10:37:25 -0500, "Propes, Barry L "
> wrote:
>> Not sure if it matters or not, but in your SponserSummaryDAO
>> method, it appears you establish the rs as null, but don't ever close
>> it? You might specifically try that.
>>
>>
On 04/11/2010 11:09, Peter Crowther wrote:
> On 4 November 2010 10:54, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 04/11/2010 05:01, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
>>> I have one doubt.
>> You have a question not a doubt
>
> I see this on many forums, and have come to realise it's associated with
> speakers of at leas
On 10/11/2010 08:29, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
> Sorry for that. I changed it 300 seconds.
OK
>> What else did you change?
[hint hint]
p
0x62590808.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Sorry for that. I changed it 300 seconds.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Pid wrote:
> On 10/11/2010 06:51, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
> > After changing time out value now I am getting this problem
> >
> > org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.SQLNestedException: Cannot get a connection,
> > pool error T
On 10/11/2010 06:51, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
> After changing time out value now I am getting this problem
>
> org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.SQLNestedException: Cannot get a connection,
> pool error Timeout waiting for idle object
Shall we guess what you set it to?
My guess is "7". Am I right?
After changing time out value now I am getting this problem
org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.SQLNestedException: Cannot get a connection,
pool error Timeout waiting for idle object
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sasidhar,
On 11/8/2010 12:31 AM, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Christopher Schultz <
> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
>>
>> I have found that these exceptions can occur even when there is no leak.
>>
>> Specifically
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sasidhar,
>
> On 11/4/2010 8:34 AM, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
> > The class is fine but in log it is showing this one. Here everything
> closed
> > fine.
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 10:37:25 -0500, "Propes, Barry L "
wrote:
Not sure if it matters or not, but in your SponserSummaryDAO
method, it appears you establish the rs as null, but don't ever close
it? You might specifically try that.
And is it necessary to reassign all those variables (connectio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sasidhar,
On 11/4/2010 8:34 AM, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
> The class is fine but in log it is showing this one. Here everything closed
> fine.
> Then why it is showing like this
>
> DBCP object created 2010-11-04 11:07:59 by the following code was n
locks?
-Original Message-
From: sasidhar prabhakar [mailto:sasidhar1...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 7:05 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: DBCP abandoned trace - unable to understand the leak
*
* @author oracle
*/
public class SponserSummaryDAO {
...
public SponserSumma
il.com]
> Sent: 04 November 2010 12:35
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: DBCP abandoned trace - unable to understand the leak
>
> The class is fine but in log it is showing this one. Here everything
closed
> fine.
> Then why it is showing like this
>
> DBCP object c
The class is fine but in log it is showing this one. Here everything closed
fine.
Then why it is showing like this
DBCP object created 2010-11-04 11:07:59 by the following code was never
closed:
java.lang.Exception
at
org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.AbandonedTrace.setStackTrace(AbandonedTrace.java:160
The full class looks ok to me. Your issues must be elsewhere.
> -Original Message-
> From: sasidhar prabhakar [mailto:sasidhar1...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 04 November 2010 12:05
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: DBCP abandoned trace - unable to understand the leak
>
&g
The complete class has only two methods. And class is
import connection.ConnectionUtil;
import java.sql.Connection;
import java.sql.PreparedStatement;
import java.sql.ResultSet;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import java.util.Calendar;
import javax.sql.DataSource;
import org.apache.commons.logging
The code you posted looks fine but without the complete class it is hard
to say 100% your class is fine.
> -Original Message-
> From: sasidhar prabhakar [mailto:sasidhar1...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 04 November 2010 11:36
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: DBCP abandoned tr
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 04/11/2010 05:01, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
> > Is abandoned trace really shows the code where the
> > connection established and did not close it.
> >>Yes.
>
The code I posted above is clean and properly closed all of
resources.
Is t
On 4 November 2010 10:54, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 04/11/2010 05:01, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
> > I have one doubt.
> You have a question not a doubt
>
> I see this on many forums, and have come to realise it's associated with
speakers of at least one of the widely-used languages in India. I've
On 04/11/2010 05:01, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
> Yes it is.
>
> I have one doubt.
You have a question not a doubt and you have more than one of them.
> Is abandoned trace really shows the code where the
> connection established and did not close it.
Yes.
> Is remove abandoned, will close the con
Yes it is.
I have one doubt. Is abandoned trace really shows the code where the
connection established and did not close it.
Is remove abandoned, will close the connection after time out and places it
back to pool. Is it really closes the connection?
for example I configured pool with 200 connec
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 13:20:48 +0530, sasidhar prabhakar
wrote:
We are using struts and following DAO pattern.
Looks fine. Does the problem occur everytime?
--
Mikolaj Rydzewski
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@to
We are using struts and following DAO pattern.
This is the code
public String getCountryName(long ipSum){
String name = null;
Connection connection = null;
PreparedStatement pstmt = null;
ResultSet rs = null;
try{
connection = dataSource.getConne
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 11:08:07 +0530, sasidhar prabhakar
wrote:
I didn't understand below, in DAO class everything fine.
Connection,PreparedStatement,ResultSet are all declared method local,
and
closed properly.
Within finally clause?
Please guide me to solve the problem.
Please show us
31 matches
Mail list logo
