As a heretic post in this forum, which usually tends to recommend the
opposite :
what about putting an Apache with mod_cache in front of your Tomcat
server ? Carefully set up, that would do what you want.
-
To unsubscribe,
Thanks Chuck for that. Perhaps my use of words was a little misleading. I
guess what i was trying to say was that the response returned by Tomcat i.e
expiry date etc was not conductive to caching for clients. In terms of
headers, i dont want to cache 'pages as the data is very transient. What i
Bill,
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:15 AM, Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The article is referring to the fact that Tomcat adds cache headers by
default to any page protected by a security-constraint to prevent someone
else from stealing it from an intermediate proxy. The default settings
I agree that i dont think the 'in memory' Tomcat solutions is what i'm
currently after, its very much a Tomcat 'heading stamp' issue i think.
Interesting point you raise though regarding pushing the statics to an
external server. Not ideal from a deployment perspective but that would
certainly
The problem however is that i'm using a remote shared host. Whilst this gives
me quite a lot of configuration potential i doubt it would allow me to setup
Apache and adaptors etc. In a 'real production environment' this would very
much be a preferred choice.
awarnier wrote:
As a heretic post
same applies on Firefox though, there may well be issues in IE as always but
i'm not convinced this is the core problem here.
Gregor Schneider wrote:
Bill,
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:15 AM, Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The article is referring to the fact that Tomcat adds cache
Sorry, I don't remember of your pages are protected or not (even the
static ones I mean).
But anyway, you might want to have a look at this :
http://www.tuckey.org/urlrewrite/
Manual for 3.2, and scroll down to the set response-header bit.
It's a servlet filter with a lot of capabilities. The
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Javabeat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
same applies on Firefox though, there may well be issues in IE as always but
i'm not convinced this is the core problem here.
I strongly disagree.
We do have a setup here having Apache HTTPD 2.2 fronting Tomcat 5.5,
and the
From: David Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat caching of static resources?
is it possible to cache static images and .js files in Tomcat?
Think about what you just asked for: how would caching static resources in the
server avoid them being downloaded by the browser? It's the
Caldarale, Charles R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: David Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat caching of static resources?
is it possible to cache static images and .js files in Tomcat?
Think about what you just asked for: how would caching
10 matches
Mail list logo
