RE: mod_jk question about lingering close_waits

2011-07-15 Thread Edward Quick
the connection_pool_timeout. Does this mean connection_pool_timeout only works if JkWatchdogInterval is swithed on? Ed. -Original Message- From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de] Sent: 13 July 2011 23:23 To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: mod_jk question about lingering close_waits

Re: mod_jk question about lingering close_waits

2011-07-15 Thread Rainer Jung
On 15.07.2011 12:09, Edward Quick wrote: Thanks for your replies. I found the solution was to set JkWatchdogInterval (by default this is not on). I set it to 30, and observed the FIN_WAIT disappears after 60 seconds (this could be the worker.maintain setting?) and the CLOSE_WAIT thread

Re: mod_jk question about lingering close_waits

2011-07-14 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 André, On 7/13/2011 5:16 PM, André Warnier wrote: 1) this is the right list for Apache/Tomcat connectors (mod_jk among them) Yes. When the question is about mod_proxy_ajp, we usually try our best but defer to the Apache httpd user's list when

Re: mod_jk question about lingering close_waits

2011-07-13 Thread André Warnier
Hi. I am not the one who can really answer your question, but 1) this is the right list for Apache/Tomcat connectors (mod_jk among them) 2) a question : do these CLOSE_WAIT sockets bother you for some specific reason ? In a totally different context, I have had problems with Linux systems

Re: mod_jk question about lingering close_waits

2011-07-13 Thread Rainer Jung
On 13.07.2011 23:16, André Warnier wrote: Hi. I am not the one who can really answer your question, but 1) this is the right list for Apache/Tomcat connectors (mod_jk among them) 2) a question : do these CLOSE_WAIT sockets bother you for some specific reason ? In a totally different