-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Francis,
On 10/2/2011 3:57 PM, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 19:46, Konstantin Kolinko
knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/10/2 Francis GALIEGUE f...@one2team.com:
1. If you want to submit it as a patch for Tomcat, you should
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 20:43, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Francis,
On 10/2/2011 3:57 PM, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 19:46, Konstantin Kolinko
knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/10/2 Francis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Francis,
On 10/4/2011 2:50 PM, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
Patch attached. I didn't know Bugzilla would treat patches this
way...
Can you give us a link to the bug?
I implemented those two interfaces again, since the existing
abstract class
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 21:02, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Francis,
On 10/4/2011 2:50 PM, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
Patch attached. I didn't know Bugzilla would treat patches this
way...
Can you give us a link to the
Hello list,
Given the problems I've had with the RemoteAddrValve, I have decided
to try my hands at implementing a more sophisticated valve which acts
more like Apache's allow/deny and which takes netmasks as arguments.
Note, it has been compile tested only (in my IDE, mind), and I have
tested
2011/10/2 Francis GALIEGUE f...@one2team.com:
Hello list,
Given the problems I've had with the RemoteAddrValve, I have decided
to try my hands at implementing a more sophisticated valve which acts
more like Apache's allow/deny and which takes netmasks as arguments.
Note, it has been compile
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 19:46, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/10/2 Francis GALIEGUE f...@one2team.com:
1. If you want to submit it as a patch for Tomcat, you should attach
it to a Bugzilla issue.
OK, will do.
2. Coding conventions:
