Mark Thomas wrote:
On 08/07/2015 16:22, André Warnier wrote:
With respect, you both don't get it. MS support is deliberately
pitiful, to emphasize the fact that MS software is by definition
bug-free and does not really need support.
I've had several extremely frustrating telephone calls th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 7/22/15 1:18 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/07/2015 16:22, André Warnier wrote:
>
>
>
>> With respect, you both don't get it. MS support is deliberately
>> pitiful, to emphasize the fact that MS software is by definition
>> bug-free a
On 08/07/2015 16:22, André Warnier wrote:
> With respect, you both don't get it. MS support is deliberately
> pitiful, to emphasize the fact that MS software is by definition
> bug-free and does not really need support.
I've had several extremely frustrating telephone calls this afternoon
wher
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 7/7/15 9:39 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 30/06/2015 21:16, Mark Thomas wrote:
This is probably off-topic now so marking as such.
On 29/06/2015 14:29, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 26/06/2015 19:37
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 7/7/15 9:39 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 30/06/2015 21:16, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> This is probably off-topic now so marking as such.
>>
>> On 29/06/2015 14:29, André Warnier wrote:
>>> Mark Thomas wrote:
On 26/06/2015 19:37, Mark Thomas
On 30/06/2015 21:16, Mark Thomas wrote:
> This is probably off-topic now so marking as such.
>
> On 29/06/2015 14:29, André Warnier wrote:
>> Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 26/06/2015 19:37, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/06/2015 11:56, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 22/06/2015 09:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
This is probably off-topic now so marking as such.
On 29/06/2015 14:29, André Warnier wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 26/06/2015 19:37, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 22/06/2015 11:56, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/06/2015 09:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>>
Prompting for authentication in respon
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 26/06/2015 19:37, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/06/2015 11:56, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/06/2015 09:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
Prompting for authentication in response to an untrusted certificate is
bizarre to say the least.
Microsoft generously provide MSDN subscriptions for A
On 26/06/2015 19:37, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 22/06/2015 11:56, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 22/06/2015 09:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>
>
>> Prompting for authentication in response to an untrusted certificate is
>> bizarre to say the least.
>>
>> Microsoft generously provide MSDN subscriptions for Apa
On 22/06/2015 11:56, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 22/06/2015 09:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Prompting for authentication in response to an untrusted certificate is
> bizarre to say the least.
>
> Microsoft generously provide MSDN subscriptions for Apache committers
> which is why I have the various OS'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Michael,
On 6/22/15 6:39 PM, Michael Salisbury wrote:
> I was wondering when I'd get a point where it's no longer
> practical to run the client through Windows, perhaps I'm getting
> close. I can connect fine over HTTP, but when I put in the
> SSL/
: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Monday, 22 June 2015 11:24 p.m.
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: SSL configuration using PFX as keystore
Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 22/06/2015 09:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 22/06/2015 00:25, Michael Salisbury wrote:
>
>
>
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
André,
On 6/19/15 9:14 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> Daniel Mikusa wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Michael Salisbury
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> I’m trying to get the above working using Tomcat 8.0,
>>> previously working with 7.
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/06/2015 09:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/06/2015 00:25, Michael Salisbury wrote:
When connecting from a Windows client (any Windows client) I get a 'network
path not found' error 0x80070035. I know the path is valid as I can reach it
via other means, and other Web
On 22/06/2015 09:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 22/06/2015 00:25, Michael Salisbury wrote:
>> When connecting from a Windows client (any Windows client) I get a 'network
>> path not found' error 0x80070035. I know the path is valid as I can reach
>> it via other means, and other WebDAV clients.
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/06/2015 00:25, Michael Salisbury wrote:
Thanks, I've done much searching - hence why I'm finally posting here.
Windows WebDAV is actually quite reasonable
Many people would disagree with that statement. It hasn't been updated
since the early days of Windows 7 but this
On 22/06/2015 00:25, Michael Salisbury wrote:
> Thanks, I've done much searching - hence why I'm finally posting here.
>
> Windows WebDAV is actually quite reasonable
Many people would disagree with that statement. It hasn't been updated
since the early days of Windows 7 but this site gives you a
skypoint.co.nz
Waikato Innovation Park, Ruakura Rd, PO Box 9466, Hamilton 3240, NZ
Please send any support enquiries to E supp...@skypoint.co.nz
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Saturday, 20 June 2015 1:15 a.m.
To: Tomcat Users List
Sub
Daniel Mikusa wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Michael Salisbury
wrote:
Hi there,
I’m trying to get the above working using Tomcat 8.0, previously working
with 7.0. This is part of a WebDAV connector in Confluence.
It seems I can connect from anything other than a Windows Mini Redi
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Michael Salisbury
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I’m trying to get the above working using Tomcat 8.0, previously working
> with 7.0. This is part of a WebDAV connector in Confluence.
>
> It seems I can connect from anything other than a Windows Mini Redirector
> clien
Hi there,
I'm trying to get the above working using Tomcat 8.0, previously working with
7.0. This is part of a WebDAV connector in Confluence.
It seems I can connect from anything other than a Windows Mini Redirector
client (Windows 7 or 8.1, x86 or x64). Using a web browser or 3rd party client
21 matches
Mail list logo
