Mark Thomas wrote:
On 16/10/2012 18:54, David Wall wrote:
By the way, the web.xml change we made was suggested in the bug report
and seems to resolve it for our IE site visitors.
Glad to head that disabling support for range requests works. That seems
like a reasonable short-term workaround
On 10/15/2012 6:37 PM, 孙文 wrote:
You are not suitable the open source community and you are a selfish guy.
Wonderful, helpful and insightful!
I egregiously suggested that reverting a line of code back to 7.0.26,
which was also standards-compliant, would have been easy and would have
On 16/10/2012 18:54, David Wall wrote:
By the way, the web.xml change we made was suggested in the bug report
and seems to resolve it for our IE site visitors.
Glad to head that disabling support for range requests works. That seems
like a reasonable short-term workaround until someone
In researching a bug our users are now suffering, I found that it was
reported already as *Bug 53814- Could not display PDF file on Tomcat
7.0.27 above.*
Sadly, it also shows that's it's considered invalid and won't be fixed
because the change made between 7.0.26 and 7.0.27 is standards
2012/10/15 David Wall d.w...@computer.org:
In researching a bug our users are now suffering, I found that it was
reported already as *Bug 53814- Could not display PDF file on Tomcat
7.0.27 above.*
Sadly, it also shows that's it's considered invalid and won't be fixed
because the change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David,
On 10/15/12 2:04 PM, David Wall wrote:
In researching a bug our users are now suffering, I found that it
was reported already as *Bug 53814- Could not display PDF file
on Tomcat 7.0.27 above.*
Sadly, it also shows that's it's
On 15/10/2012 19:04, David Wall wrote:
As the person who closed Bug 53814 as invalid, I thought it would be
useful to expand on my reasoning for doing so.
In researching a bug our users are now suffering, I found that it was
reported already as *Bug 53814- Could not display PDF file on
