On 6/19/2012 8:07 PM, André Warnier wrote:
James Lampert wrote:
. . . and when I looked back at the box I was testing, Tomcat *had*
finally shut down. And when I ran both the start and stop scripts
this time, the stop script worked perfectly (and promptly).
Weird. Why would the shutdown take
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 19:19 -0400, David Kerber wrote:
On 6/19/2012 8:07 PM, André Warnier wrote:
James Lampert wrote:
. . . and when I looked back at the box I was testing, Tomcat *had*
finally shut down. And when I ran both the start and stop scripts
this time, the stop script worked
In my experience, Tomcat's shutdown.sh has never worked reliably on
AS/400, and I don't know why, or even understand enough about how it
works (or enough about shell scripts) to troubleshoot it.
Here's the script. I can tell that it eventually transfers control to
catalina.sh (which is also
James Lampert wrote:
In my experience, Tomcat's shutdown.sh has never worked reliably on
AS/400, and I don't know why, or even understand enough about how it
works (or enough about shell scripts) to troubleshoot it.
Here's the script. I can tell that it eventually transfers control to
. . . and when I looked back at the box I was testing, Tomcat *had*
finally shut down. And when I ran both the start and stop scripts this
time, the stop script worked perfectly (and promptly).
Weird. Why would the shutdown take so long as to give the impression it
had failed entirely, then
James Lampert wrote:
. . . and when I looked back at the box I was testing, Tomcat *had*
finally shut down. And when I ran both the start and stop scripts this
time, the stop script worked perfectly (and promptly).
Weird. Why would the shutdown take so long as to give the impression it
had
