RE: generic deployment question

2012-02-21 Thread Terence M. Bandoian
On 1:59 PM, Jeffrey Janner wrote: -Original Message- From: Terence M. Bandoian [mailto:tere...@tmbsw.com] Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 5:14 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: generic deployment question On 1:59 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE

RE: generic deployment question

2012-02-21 Thread Jeffrey Janner
> -Original Message- > From: Terence M. Bandoian [mailto:tere...@tmbsw.com] > Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 5:14 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: generic deployment question > > On 1:59 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

Re: generic deployment question

2012-02-18 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2012/2/17 Jeffrey Janner : > Assume latest Tomcat 6.x for current deployment, and 7.x for future > deployments. > > I host an app for a couple of dozen customers.  Naturally, upgrade time can > be a bit of a pain, and I'd like to simplify things. > Assuming that all the customer-specific informat

Re: generic deployment question

2012-02-18 Thread Terence M. Bandoian
On 1:59 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeffrey, On 2/17/12 10:45 AM, Jeffrey Janner wrote: Thanks. I was under the impression that Tomcat normally explodes the war files when you drop them into the webapps folder, though I know you can disable th

Re: generic deployment question

2012-02-17 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeffrey, On 2/17/12 10:45 AM, Jeffrey Janner wrote: > Thanks. I was under the impression that Tomcat normally explodes > the war files when you drop them into the webapps folder, though I > know you can disable that feature. I was suggesting that yo

RE: generic deployment question

2012-02-17 Thread Jeffrey Janner
> -Original Message- > From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com] > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 2:49 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: generic deployment question > > On 16/02/2012 21:12, Jeffrey Janner wrote: > > Assume latest Tomcat 6.x for current dep

RE: generic deployment question

2012-02-17 Thread Jeffrey Janner
> -Original Message- > From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 9:36 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: generic deployment question > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Je

RE: generic deployment question

2012-02-17 Thread Jeffrey Janner
> -Original Message- > From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 9:42 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: generic deployment question > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Jef

Re: generic deployment question

2012-02-17 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeffrey, On 2/17/12 10:39 AM, Jeffrey Janner wrote: > That's actually the current deployment mechanism that I'm wanting > to get changed. Unfortunately right now, there are some > application related config files buried under the WEB-INF directory >

Re: generic deployment question

2012-02-17 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeffrey, On 2/17/12 10:36 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Jeffrey, > > On 2/16/12 4:12 PM, Jeffrey Janner wrote: >> I host an app for a couple of dozen customers. Naturally, >> upgrade time can be a bit of a pain, and I'd like to simplify >> things

RE: generic deployment question

2012-02-17 Thread Jeffrey Janner
> -Original Message- > From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com] > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 9:22 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: generic deployment question > > > From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]

Re: generic deployment question

2012-02-17 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeffrey, On 2/16/12 4:12 PM, Jeffrey Janner wrote: > I host an app for a couple of dozen customers. Naturally, upgrade > time can be a bit of a pain, and I'd like to simplify things. > Assuming that all the customer-specific information (DB connect

RE: generic deployment question

2012-02-17 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com] > Subject: RE: generic deployment question > But, really, I just wanted to know if my original suggestion > would cause issues with Tomcat. As Pid stated, it might work, but it's not a guaranteed deployment mechanis

RE: generic deployment question

2012-02-17 Thread Jeffrey Janner
> -Original Message- > From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 3:32 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: generic deployment question > > Jeffrey Janner wrote: > > Assume latest Tomcat 6.x for current dep

Re: generic deployment question

2012-02-17 Thread Pid
On 16/02/2012 21:12, Jeffrey Janner wrote: > Assume latest Tomcat 6.x for current deployment, and 7.x for future > deployments. > > I host an app for a couple of dozen customers. Naturally, upgrade time can > be a bit of a pain, and I'd like to simplify things. > Assuming that all the customer-

Re: generic deployment question

2012-02-16 Thread André Warnier
Jeffrey Janner wrote: Assume latest Tomcat 6.x for current deployment, and 7.x for future deployments. I host an app for a couple of dozen customers. Naturally, upgrade time can be a bit of a pain, why ? and I'd like to simplify things. Assuming that all the customer-specific information

generic deployment question

2012-02-16 Thread Jeffrey Janner
Assume latest Tomcat 6.x for current deployment, and 7.x for future deployments. I host an app for a couple of dozen customers. Naturally, upgrade time can be a bit of a pain, and I'd like to simplify things. Assuming that all the customer-specific information (DB connection info, logger info,