Hello Romain,
More familiar with JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2150
Best Regards.
-Original Message-
From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com]
Sent: lundi 27 novembre 2017 16:42
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Subject: [++SPAM++]: Re: Re: Re: Re: : Re: Re: :
being managed is not that hard, you can check
https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/openejb-core/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/resource/jdbc/managed/JTADataSourceWrapperFactory.java
out
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-27 16:54 GMT
Hi Karl,
Do you know at build/deploy time what drivers you will be using (e.g.
MySQL, Postgres etc). If so it would probably be easiest to point a set of
datasources to HAProxy on say port 1, 10001 etc and then do the runtime
setup on HAProxy by configuring the frontend to backend mappings as
Hi,
Thanks for the idea. And to have it jta managed etc? Anything I need to think
about to make it behave as normal. No source in front of me now but maybe
enough to use correct datasource impl?
Skickat från min iPhone
> 27 nov. 2017 kl. 16:42 skrev Romain Manni-Bucau :
>
> Hi
>
> if you ha
also i did not realise that @Dependent is a Scope. so i was declaring
@RequestScoped and @Dependent at the same time
On 27/11/2017 11:41, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
looks like it. another method was injecting the security context, so
i moved it to it own class and now it is working. changing f
Hi
if you have a router impl you can just use your own datasource manager
behind it and manage it the way you want no?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-27 16:27 GMT+01:00 Karl Kildén :
> Hello!
>
> For production we use tomee.xml and for development
2017-11-27 16:29 GMT+01:00 COURTAULT Francois :
> Hello Romain,
>
> Agreed but no so familiar with that.
>
> If the compare has to be set on my branch:
>- First, I need to create a new one from master, right ?
>- Second, I have to submit a code change in TomEE, right ?
1. fork tomee reposi
Hello Romain,
Agreed but no so familiar with that.
If the compare has to be set on my branch:
- First, I need to create a new one from master, right ?
- Second, I have to submit a code change in TomEE, right ?
May be it should be easier, for me, to submit an issue on TomEE Jira.
Best Rega
Hello!
For production we use tomee.xml and for development resources.xml and are
very happy.
Our next app to convert to tomee is multi-tenant with a hard requirement on
logical separation so we will need a Router and dynamic datasources. This
is also working very well in my tests.
We will have
base branch = master
compare = your branch
no?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-27 15:36 GMT+01:00 COURTAULT Francois :
> Hello Romain,
>
> Done.
> #114 Tomee 7.0.4 issue with CDI interceptor and WebServiceContext resource
> injection
>
> I have st
Hello Romain,
Done.
#114 Tomee 7.0.4 issue with CDI interceptor and WebServiceContext resource
injection
I have still a question, in order to create a pull request, I have to have a
base branch and a compare branch, right ?
So I have set the base branch to Master and the compare branch to
tome
PR on master on github yes or patch attached to a jira (but review
will be a bit longer)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-27 12:36 GMT+01:00 COURTAULT Francois :
> Hello Romain,
>
> How can I do that ? Pull-request on master branch ? Go directly to J
Hello Romain,
How can I do that ? Pull-request on master branch ? Go directly to JIRA ?
Best Regards.
-Original Message-
From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com]
Sent: lundi 27 novembre 2017 12:05
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Subject: [++SPAM++]: Re: : Re: Re: : Re: : Re: :
I have to confess I think it is not specified at all (JAX-WS not being
updated for this case) but feel free to propose a fix on github. No
blocker to enrich it.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-27 11:56 GMT+01:00 COURTAULT Francois :
> Hello Romain,
Hello Romain,
OK but this didn't happen with the other App Servers. The only I haven't tried
is Liberty but I can if you want.
So for me it's a bug, right ?
Best Regards.
-Original Message-
From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com]
Sent: lundi 27 novembre 2017 11:47
To: us
Back to the first post I think: you get a proxy and the proxy gets the
injections properly but this is not your business instance.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-27 11:32 GMT+01:00 COURTAULT Francois :
> Hello Romain,
>
> I have defined an annotati
looks like it. another method was injecting the security context, so i
moved it to it own class and now it is working. changing from
@ApplicationScoped to @RequestScoped must have uncovered the problem. i
set everything to requestscoped now because all only produce on request
On 27/11/2017
Hello Romain,
I have defined an annotation like below:
@Inherited
@InterceptorBinding
@Target({ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.TYPE})
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
public @interface Logged {
@Nonbinding
String logLevel() default "INFO";
}
Then, I have written a class like this:
@Logged
Loops in you generic usages?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-27 11:29 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead :
> starts up ok but then on page load i get
>
> |java.lang.StackOverflowError at
> org.apache.webbeans.util.GenericsUtil.isAssignableFrom(GenericsUtil
starts up ok but then on page load i get
|java.lang.StackOverflowError at
org.apache.webbeans.util.GenericsUtil.isAssignableFrom(GenericsUtil.java:172)
at
org.apache.webbeans.util.GenericsUtil.isAssignableFrom(GenericsUtil.java:146)
at
org.apache.webbeans.util.GenericsUtil.isAssignableFrom(G
Hi
it looks accurate, a normal scoped instance - request scoped - proxies
a not null instance so you can't return null. Using a @RequestScoped
producer class (the enclosing one) and @Dependent producer can work
too if you inject this context in request scoped instances only.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@r
If there is no proxy for the instance this should work, did you ensure
it is not a cdi bean somehow or a @Dependent cdi bean?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-27 11:00 GMT+01:00 COURTAULT Francois :
> Hello Romain,
>
> Sorry to come back to you about
No but you can tune it with beans.xml (excludes, scanning mode, etc...)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-27 10:57 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead :
> should i somehow be manually defining which beans are cdi managed?
>
>
> On 27/11/2017 10:48, Romain Man
if @Produces can produce null e.g.
@Produces
@Default
@RequestScoped
public KeycloakSecurityContext keycloakSecurityContext() {
if (httpServletRequest.getUserPrincipal() instanceof
KeycloakPrincipal) {
KeycloakPrincipal keycloakPrincipal =
(KeycloakPrincipal)
httpServletRequest.get
Hello Romain,
Sorry to come back to you about this topic.
But I think there is a real issue with CDI interceptor in TomEE 7.0.4.
Let me explain, I have removed in the LoggingInterceptor annotated with @Logged
@Interceptor, the code below
@Inject
@Intercepted
private Bean intercepted;
And
should i somehow be manually defining which beans are cdi managed?
On 27/11/2017 10:48, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
all i guess,
System.out.println(beanManager.getBeans(Object.class)) should list them
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-27 10:31 GMT+0
all i guess,
System.out.println(beanManager.getBeans(Object.class)) should list them
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-27 10:31 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead :
> yes that works. does that mean all classes are being added as cdi for some
> reason? or
yes that works. does that mean all classes are being added as cdi for
some reason? or only ones that are being produced?
On 27/11/2017 10:25, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
hmm there is not link with serializable but if it is a cdi bean then
producing it will make it ambiguous
add @vetoed on the
hmm there is not link with serializable but if it is a cdi bean then
producing it will make it ambiguous
add @vetoed on the class maybe?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-27 10:24 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead :
> should not be serializable?
>
>
> On 2
should not be serializable?
On 27/11/2017 10:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
No but likely MyCustomObject is scanned and has a default constructor
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-27 10:00 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead :
If I include a jar in several
No but likely MyCustomObject is scanned and has a default constructor
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-27 10:00 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead :
> If I include a jar in several webapps and the jar contains some
> @ApplicationScoped beans it seems to wor
If I include a jar in several webapps and the jar contains some
@ApplicationScoped beans it seems to work fine. i.e. those
@ApplicationScoped beans can be injected into the beans in the webapps
without conflict.
However if I use @Produces, e.g
@Produces
@MyQualifier
@RequestScoped
public MyCu
32 matches
Mail list logo
