+1, version 3.2.0 passes our test function.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:39 PM, 黄英才 wrote:
> -1
> The reverse_map does't work!
> more detail at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-1309
>
>
> 2012/6/20 David Carlin
>
>> Check out https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TS/Upgrading+to+3
-1
The reverse_map does't work!
more detail at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-1309
2012/6/20 David Carlin
> Check out https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TS/Upgrading+to+3.2
>
> On 6/19/12 2:55 PM, "Jan-Frode Myklebust" wrote:
>
> >BTW: are there any upgrade instructions betwe
Check out https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TS/Upgrading+to+3.2
On 6/19/12 2:55 PM, "Jan-Frode Myklebust" wrote:
>BTW: are there any upgrade instructions between 3.0 and 3.2, or summary
>about important changes between these ?
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 03:38:52PM -0600, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> With 8 +1 votes (4 binding), and no -1's or 0's, this vote passes.
> I'll push the bits to dist soon.
Great!
BTW: are there any upgrade instructions between 3.0 and 3.2, or summary
about important changes between these ?
-jf
On 6/14/12 7:54 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Hi all,
I've prepared a release for v3.2.0, this release has no significant
changes compared to v3.1.4.
The artifacts are available at
http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/rel-candidates/:
With 8 +1 votes (4 binding), and no -1's or 0's, this vote passes
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 07:54:09PM -0600, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> I've prepared a release for v3.2.0, this release has no significant
> changes compared to v3.1.4.
+1
Works fine for me on RHEL6/x86_64.
-jf
+1 from me on RHEL6.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On 6/14/12 7:54 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've prepared a release for v3.2.0, this release has no significant
>> changes compared to v3.1.4.
>
>
> Obviously +1, but it's sort of a moot point seeing the
On 6/14/12 7:54 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Hi all,
I've prepared a release for v3.2.0, this release has no significant
changes compared to v3.1.4.
Obviously +1, but it's sort of a moot point seeing there's only a total
of 2 binding votes...
Disappointing.
-- Leif
- Original Message -
> +1
>
> Passed sig checks, built, and passed regression, running as home
> forward proxy server now. I also diffed the code against the 3.1.4
> release and only saw minor header include changes and the memcpy()
> change.
>
> Talked to David Carlin and it has been ru
+1
Passed sig checks, built, and passed regression, running as home forward proxy
server now. I also diffed the code against the 3.1.4 release and only saw
minor header include changes and the memcpy() change.
Talked to David Carlin and it has been running in production on a couple boxes
over
+1
Running on two hosts since Friday afternoon:
Host #1) 5K QPS and 25K current connections
Host #2) 100 QPS and 1.2K current connections
Both are running fine.
On 6/14/12 6:54 PM, "Leif Hedstrom" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I've prepared a release for v3.2.0, this release has no significant
>changes
+1
34m reqs, ~500GB served across a cluster of 3 ATS boxes over the past 7
days. 3.1.4 in use up to Friday, and since then 3.2 RC1. No issues.
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
> On 14/06/12 06:54 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've prepared a release for v3.2.0,
On 14/06/12 06:54 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Hi all,
I've prepared a release for v3.2.0, this release has no significant
changes compared to v3.1.4.
The artifacts are available at
http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/rel-candidates/:
-rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 2516870 Jun 14 20:53 trafficserver-3.2.0
On 14/06/2012, at 7:32 PM, Nguyen Hai Nam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've posted on TS-225, ATS still seems to miss SunOS.
TS-225 is closed. Please file a new bug and clearly state your platform and the
unexpected behaviour that you are experiencing ...
thanks!
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/brows
I'm soo silly. Got it.
Thanks
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On 6/14/12 9:05 PM, Nguyen Hai Nam wrote:
>>
>> I mean Oracle Solaris, OpenIndiana, or others Solaris-based OSes,
>> (uname -s told SunOS in general)
>
>
> Those use a different "rc" format. Look at rc/solaris
On 6/14/12 9:05 PM, Nguyen Hai Nam wrote:
I mean Oracle Solaris, OpenIndiana, or others Solaris-based OSes,
(uname -s told SunOS in general)
Also, as a general request, please everyone, make sure you send emails to
these lists with a From: address that is on the subscription list. Otherwise
w
On 6/14/12 9:05 PM, Nguyen Hai Nam wrote:
I mean Oracle Solaris, OpenIndiana, or others Solaris-based OSes,
(uname -s told SunOS in general)
Those use a different "rc" format. Look at rc/solaris for details (you need
to use the XML config).
-- leif
I mean Oracle Solaris, OpenIndiana, or others Solaris-based OSes,
(uname -s told SunOS in general)
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On 6/14/12 8:32 PM, Nguyen Hai Nam wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've posted on TS-225, ATS still seems to miss SunOS.
>>
>
> SunOS? As in SunOS4? W
On 6/14/12 8:32 PM, Nguyen Hai Nam wrote:
Hi,
I've posted on TS-225, ATS still seems to miss SunOS.
SunOS? As in SunOS4? We don't support that.
-- Leif
Hi,
I've posted on TS-225, ATS still seems to miss SunOS.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-225?focusedCommentId=13295431&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13295431
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've prepar
Hi all,
I've prepared a release for v3.2.0, this release has no significant changes
compared to v3.1.4.
The artifacts are available at http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/rel-candidates/:
-rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 2516870 Jun 14 20:53 trafficserver-3.2.0.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop
21 matches
Mail list logo
