Martin Makundi wrote:
Now if I change the country, I must change the list of allowed values
for cityCombo.
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/ajax/choice
Thanks, I remember seeing that but already forgot about the idea that
a dropdown choice can be a model, and a smart model too.
So if you want to be stateless then onClick only works if you use a
StatelessLink and then you should push yourself the params in the url.
But what do you want to do in the onclick? That cant be done in the
constructor or the target page?
On 6/15/08, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more
Calls are synced but they can be in the wait for each other and if
then the first changes the component structure then the other that is
already waiting comes in then it cant find it anymore. But this call
should just be ignored as far as i know
On 6/15/08, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for reply.
Maybe I didn't explain clearly. I knew how to override in myPage.properties
and myForm.properties. But I mean if I want to override in
myApplication.properties, is it possible to do and how's the hierarchies?
richardwilko wrote:
If yo have a Required validator on a
Thanks guys,
You know when sometimes you take a hammer and try to get into this small
mosquito?
well, I looked into PageLink and IPageLink and tried to be over creative :)
eventually, I used a normal Link with onClick
The thing is that I was very confused with how to pass the PageParameters to
what bug # is that one?
igor.vaynberg wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Martin Makundi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
When I chain components, comboboxes and tables etc., I find myself
repeatedly solving the same problem:
* the parent component causes a data reload
if you
Hi,
Is there any one available to provide Wicket training and/or consulting in
the SF Bay area?
I need help urgently. Off hours is fine.
Thanks,
-Mohammad
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/wicket-training-consulting-in-the-SF-Bay-Area-tp17859255p17859255.html
Sent
I put some u
wicket 1.3.3
I request a url (http://www.splashnote.com/myHome/test),but this url is not
mountBookmarkablePage.
then page is throw exception.I don't it throw exception
--
View this message in context:
wicket 1.3.3
I request a url (http://www.splashnote.com/myHome/test),but this url is not
mountBookmarkablePage.
then page is throw exception.I don't it throw exception
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
we have our own customized session.
We have a field called pageId.
We set it whenever the user clicks a subclass of Link.
We call the getter in the linksTo of a link.
we have more than a few such links.
My question:
Is putting a field in a Session and call it makes the session work to
hard?
Many thanks from me also. I just had the problem with a login from a
stateless page, where the userinformation was lost on the next
request. Following the list in readonly mode save me some time again
;)
Bert
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Stefan Simik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great, it
i think they are pointing to this one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1312
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Jonathan Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
what bug # is that one?
igor.vaynberg wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Martin Makundi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is putting a field in a Session and call it makes the session work to
hard?
I'm not a web expert so maybe my question is naive, but does calling for a
field in a Wicket Session creates overload in the net?
No, it is common practice, in general. Search the list for 'session'
and 'field'.
create a jira with a test case.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 2:56 AM, mfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And surprisingly, this issue comes in IE and Safari but not in Mozilla..
mfs wrote:
Any update on this issue, i am facing an issue somewhat related, where
clicking on an ajaxlink once the
Hi,
we have been using this patched version now in a production environment
few days. Seems to be working nicely. Memory problems disappeared.
- Juha
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
if someone can confirm that the patch works in a production env i will
be happy to commit it. i just havent had the time
This is a Best Practice question.
Suppose I have a component and I want to set its visibility according to
certain parameters.
Suppose I can do it by overriding the isVisible but I can also use the
setVisible after creating the constructor.
Is there a preferable way?
Does it depend on the
isVisible is generally better imo because it is state driven. if you push
instead of pull, the state can get stale.
Eyal Golan wrote:
This is a Best Practice question.
Suppose I have a component and I want to set its visibility according to
certain parameters.
Suppose I can do it by
thanks Michael,
That's what I thought.
BTW,
isn't volatile will create overhead on the Session?
Read this: http://www.javaperformancetuning.com/news/qotm030.shtml
Eyal G
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Michael Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is putting a field in a Session and call it makes
Thijs Vonk wrote:
Ate Douma wrote:
Thanks to both of you!
Note though that you have to build a svn copy of the
portlet-container.
RC2 contains a bug I found which prevents Ajax to work correctly.
Will try that.
-
To
I've been thinking about writing aspects that fire Component.onModelChanged
even when the model's object changed (possibly deep within an object
hierarchy).
Do you have a demo about this?
I am about to write a HierarchicalAjaxRefreshTargetPropagator soon
just to get a feeling if it is a bad
Yes but ...
isVisible may be triggered several times, while setVisible should only be
called once (say if I do it only once after creating the component).
Usually I prefer the state driven way, but what if the logic has a lot of
overhead?
Jonathan Locke wrote:
isVisible is generally
true.
in the isVisible impl you could lazy-init cache a transient Boolean until
end request where you set it null.
setters are evil.
egolan74 wrote:
Yes but ...
isVisible may be triggered several times, while setVisible should only be
called once (say if I do it only once after
Eyal wrote:
isn't volatile will create overhead on the Session?
Read this: http://www.javaperformancetuning.com/news/qotm030.shtml
Any overhead is essential, Eyal. You *want* threads to flush their
memory caches, when accessing session variables. Otherwise, variable
changes by one thread
Hi,
We started to use 1.3.X because
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1667 will be probably fixed
soon in 1.3.X.
There seems to be some changes in
public static String resourceKey(final String path, final Locale locale,
final String style) in SharedResources.
We have been using
Martin Makundi wrote:
I've been thinking about writing aspects that fire Component.onModelChanged
even when the model's object changed (possibly deep within an object
hierarchy).
Do you have a demo about this?
Unfortunately no, I didn't have the time to convert my brain contents to
If you just need a reference to the AjaxRequestTarget then you can do
RequestCycle.get().getRequestTarget() and do an instanceof with
AjaxRequestTarget.
Well, I need the ajax event too so I suppose I can equally well pick
up the target from there. I will post my brain later if I am
succesful.
This is not a bug. The $up$ stuff was put in there to trick the
browser into not trying to automatically resolve the .. for you.
This is necessary for resources.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Juha Alatalo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We started to use 1.3.X because
Hello,
I have in my Session a field called pageId.
I have Link that in the onClick I set in the session the page id and then go
to a new page using setResponsePage.
@Override
public void onClick() {
PortalSession session = ((SecuredBasePage)
getPage()).getEurekifySession();
Now browser does never find my css-file. What is the trick to make
things work again?
James Carman wrote:
This is not a bug. The $up$ stuff was put in there to trick the
browser into not trying to automatically resolve the .. for you.
This is necessary for resources.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at
Why are you building wicket in wicket?
Wicket keeps track of the last page already and detects back button
usage perfectly by itself.
Martijn
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have in my Session a field called pageId.
I have Link that in the
I am not :)
The back button work perfect (thanks to Wicket :) ).
The thing that I call pageId is something that indicates our structure of
hierarchy pages.
It's not Wicket's page Id.
My question actually is, if there is a way to set values in the Session when
pressing the back button?
On Mon,
So now things are actually working as they should. Forget this thread, I
am an idiot.
Thanks and keep up the good work.
- Juha
Juha Alatalo wrote:
Now browser does never find my css-file. What is the trick to make
things work again?
James Carman wrote:
This is not a bug. The $up$ stuff
Hi,
Just a little background, i've been trying to get my application clustered
with terracotta for a while and ran into a big problem. Basically wicket
was producing more garbage objects than terracotta could handle, as such
terracotta was using up loads of disk space (see my thread on
That's what I said ;)
Johan Compagner wrote:
i think they are pointing to this one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1312
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Jonathan Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
what bug # is that one?
igor.vaynberg wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at
Jonathan Locke wrote:
true.
in the isVisible impl you could lazy-init cache a transient Boolean until
end request where you set it null.
setters are evil.
..but it's good to have choice. *And* setVisible is not a normal setter,
because it returns the component, which makes it easy to
yes I have.
As I understood, breadcrum is something like a Panel.
All of our links direct to Pages.
Do you know of a way to use breadcrumbs with pages?
It's not possible for us to change the whole structure of our application.
One more thing, the XML structure is also used to filter a legacy
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Matthijs Wensveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A little off-topic: It scares me a little when core developer make bold
statements like: setters are evil and I wouldn't mind final was the
default in java. Maybe I'm just being paranoid here...
Why? Are we not allowed
What is your idea of nice chaining?
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/ajax/choice
I am using 1.4-m1 and I tried to make
public abstract class AbstractListChoiceModelS extends
AbstractReadOnlyModelListS {
@Override
public final ListS getObject() {
return getChoices();
}
protected
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Matthijs Wensveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A little off-topic: It scares me a little when core developer make bold
statements like: setters are evil and I wouldn't mind final was the
default in java. Maybe I'm just being paranoid
That's why I almost always override isVisible like
@Override boolean isVisible() {
return super.isVisible() myVisibilityConstraints;
}
Thus I can go for both approches (push and / or pull state).
Maybe this could be added to the Javadoc of isVisible ?
Just my 2 cents,
Antoine.
Got it to work after building portlet-bridges-common from the trunk
source.
- The change I made to PortletWindowUtils which seems to work (so far
*crosses fingers*):
public static String getPortletWindowId(PortletSession session)
{
final Object tmp =
AbstractReadOnlyModelList? extends S { should work iirc
-igor
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 7:08 AM, Martin Makundi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is your idea of nice chaining?
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/ajax/choice
I am using 1.4-m1 and I tried to make
public abstract class
i think you may have a few things to learn and it is not exactly
controversial to prefer immutability or encapsulation... setters break
encapsulation and i think it is safe to say decades of experience with
object systems is on my side, including industry luminaries like:
Mohammad,
We may be able to help.
Contact us http://jweekend.co.uk/dev/ContactUsBody/ here to discuss your
requirements.
Regards - Cemal
http://jWeekend.co.uk http://jWeekend.co.uk
quote author=m_salman
Hi,
Is there any one available to provide Wicket training and/or consulting in
the
I did a few more experiments with static images in Wicket 1.3 and
narrowed the problem down to my use of AttributeModifier:
Consider a Wicket home page with no components that displays a static
image via the following HTML:
html
head
titleWicket Quickstart Archetype Homepage/title
see ContextImage.
Martijn
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Frank Silbermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did a few more experiments with static images in Wicket 1.3 and
narrowed the problem down to my use of AttributeModifier:
Consider a Wicket home page with no components that displays a
Do any of the examples (or other documentation) illustrate its use?
-Original Message-
From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 10:15 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket 1.2 - 1.3 upgrade question
see ContextImage.
Martijn
On Mon,
Wouldn't surrounding your img tag with wicket:link help?
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
javadoc
-igor
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Frank Silbermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do any of the examples (or other documentation) illustrate its use?
Hi,
Can anyone think of a way to inject members into an IInitializer or at least
gain access to an Injector instance inside it? As far as I can tell I can't
even get access to the Servlet Context or Application from inside the
IInitializer. I'm open to suggestions.
Thanks,
Gili
--
View this
Hi,
How do I get data generated by javascript functions to my Java code using
Wicket. For example, I have the following javascript code:
script type=text/javascript
var map;
var gdir;
var geocoder = null;
var addressMarker;
var mileage;
function initialize() {
I could help aswell, please mail me directly with requirements.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:02 PM, jWeekend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mohammad,
We may be able to help.
Contact us http://jweekend.co.uk/dev/ContactUsBody/ here to discuss your
requirements.
Regards - Cemal
What is best way to integrate NTLM with Wicket authentication module ?
Currently, we are migrating from Standard Login page implementation to a
JCIF's NTLM (Windows domain credentials).
JCIF's provides a convenient servlet filter to do the NTLM handshake. It
sticks the username in the
IInitializer.onInitializer(Application app) {
ServletContext sc=((WebApplication)app).getServletContext();
}
-igor
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:04 AM, cowwoc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone think of a way to inject members into an IInitializer or at least
gain access to an Injector
Sorry, the reason I initially missed this option is that
GuiceWebApplicationFactory was not saving the Injector into the servlet
context. I've since fixed this and this now works.
Thanks,
Gili
igor.vaynberg wrote:
IInitializer.onInitializer(Application app) {
ServletContext
i dont know how terracotta works so i will comment on wicket stuff only.
looks like a good solution if you are looking to compress the page as
far as the number of objects go. a cleaner way to do this might be to
do it in sessionstore and share out that class through terracotta.
-igor
On Mon,
ive committed the fix for 1.3 and 1.4. please test it out, there was a
minor tweak for also putting page class into the cache key for
wicket-1697. there is a little bit of syncing going on in localizer
now that is used to translate class name to an integer in order to
drastically shorten the cache
I created an Link to another page's anchor similar to the code shown
below. The anchor actually gets tagged on to the bookmarkable URL.
However, for some reason the browser does not jump to my anchor.
Not sure what's going on - is there a particular way I have to create an
anchor in Wicket so
Ravi_116 wrote:
What is best way to integrate NTLM with Wicket authentication module ?
Currently, we are migrating from Standard Login page implementation to a
JCIF's NTLM (Windows domain credentials).
JCIF's provides a convenient servlet filter to do the NTLM handshake. It
sticks the
Or the wicket-iolite maven archetype, which has a really simple example
of this:
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Wicket-Iolite
James Carman wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:51 AM, m_salman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
Unfortunately I need more
Have you tried using this in a ajax based form in Wicket? It seems that it
does not like ajax based submits but the solutions in the nicedit forums
seems to be fail as well.
The problem is that the model for the textarea you add the nic behavior to,
never gets updated when you submit the form.
Nino - Thanks for the reply
The AuthenticatedWebSession has the isSignedIn() method defined final. So
cannot extend and override it.
/**
* @return True if the user is signed in to this session
*/
public final boolean isSignedIn()
{
return
Using swarm, i usually let the default isAuthenticated methods intact
and let the request be redirected to the loginpage where i check if a
known third party has done the authentication for me, if so i
automatically log the user in for wicket and redirect back to where i
came from.
You can
Yes - they do match - you're right, always check the basics first. The
problem is that even if I bookmark the anchored page (with the anchor
tagged on), and load the page it won't jump there. So, I don't think
it's the way I create the anchor (because the URL looks correct) - it's
all the other
Not an issue I've come across but also not an area I've explored... A quick
search through the mailing list did suggest one possible approach as below,
but I've no idea how viable it might be!
public Page extends WebPage implements IHeadContributor {
@Override
public void
Of course I have a few things to learn, and I hope I never stop
learning. The article you provide is interesting.
My opinion is that for domain entity objects, getters and setters are
certainly not evil. For classes that are more service-like, getters and
setters could be useful but should be
I have this:
@Override
public boolean authenticate(String username, String password) {
Person person = new Person();
person.setAlias(username);
person.setPassword(password);
return dBDao.authorizePerson(person);
}
public boolean isAuthorized() {
66 matches
Mail list logo
