Yes. I use latest version of both in my project.
On Mar 10, 2016 12:09 AM, "nino martinez wael"
wrote:
> I've added an issue here:
>
> https://github.com/l0rdn1kk0n/wicket-bootstrap/issues/590
>
> Cant remenber if theres actually an example for it in the wicket
>
I've added an issue here:
https://github.com/l0rdn1kk0n/wicket-bootstrap/issues/590
Cant remenber if theres actually an example for it in the wicket
bootstrap tests, have you tried wicket 7.2 with bootstrap?
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Martin Grigorov
wrote:
>
On Mar 9, 2016 11:59 PM, "nino martinez wael"
wrote:
>
> Have anyone used this in conjuction with wicket 7.2.. I had to upgrade
> to wicket 7.2 because of problems with [WICKET-6002]..
>
> But wicket bootstrap throws strange exceptions about missing fields
> that it
Have anyone used this in conjuction with wicket 7.2.. I had to upgrade
to wicket 7.2 because of problems with [WICKET-6002]..
But wicket bootstrap throws strange exceptions about missing fields
that it did not do in 7.1.
--
Best regards / Med venlig hilsen
Nino Martinez
Hi,
I think the question was how to modify the *header* of the column and not the
cell’s content. Therefore you only need to do the following:
@Override
Component getHeader(String componentId) {
return new MyFancyHeaderPanel(componentId);
}
… in your PropertyColumn (anonymous) subclass.
If you want to your own html, you need to create an object that extends
PropertyColumn
Let's say that XXXPropertyColumn extend PropertyColumn
You need to override the populateItem(Item item, String
componentId, IModel rowModel) method
for example
@Override
public void
Hello,
In DataTableFilterToolbarPag, we use columns.add(new PropertyColumn ...
I would like to modify the content of the header of this column.
Must I do "replace the header component of the header of column" ? But how to
do that?
Must i my own column objects? I
You have right, the "size" was broken.
Thanks
PHL.
De : Martin Grigorov
Envoyé : vendredi 4 mars 2016 07:26
À : users@wicket.apache.org
Objet : Re: Bug in example ? repeater.DataTableFilterToolbarPage
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at
Yes, indeed.
Sven
On 09.03.2016 15:43, Lars Törner wrote:
Hi Sven and thanks for your answer!
Ok I see! That's a better solution. I guess it means that I don't have to
set:
getExceptionSettings().setAjaxErrorHandlingStrategy(
AjaxErrorStrategy.INVOKE_FAILURE_HANDLER);
Because we'll never get
Hi Sven and thanks for your answer!
Ok I see! That's a better solution. I guess it means that I don't have to
set:
getExceptionSettings().setAjaxErrorHandlingStrategy(
AjaxErrorStrategy.INVOKE_FAILURE_HANDLER);
Because we'll never get to the DefaultExceptionMapper (in the case of an
expected
Hi Lars,
> if this is a good or bad way to handle exceptions during ajax requests
I'd keep your IRequestCycleListener and just return new
ErrorCodeRequestHandler(500, message) from there.
No need to fiddle with IExceptionMapper and/or DefaultExceptionMapper.
Have fun
Sven
On 09.03.2016
Thanks Matrin for your quick reply.
Changing to POST seems to work fine, thanks!
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You can use #updateAjaxAttributes() (
>
>
About exception handling
I would like a fallback for unexcpected exceptions that are thrown during
ajax-calls.
I don't want to redirect to a new page so in my application#init I do:
getExceptionSettings().setAjaxErrorHandlingStrategy(AjaxErrorStrategy.INVOKE_FAILURE_HANDLER);
For the moment I
13 matches
Mail list logo