A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
btw.. are any of the core devs interested or willing to mentor? Once
again it seems a lame excuse to say you're too busy or the various other
things when this could both give the project good pr and possibly add
more people who contribute to the framework.
./C
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Martijn
Thanks Martijn.. You've shown me what a good catalyst and community
leader you finally are.. It's not about my bidding.. I push for gsoc..
my points are valid.. others have brought up other good points.. and yet
when I push in general you make it personal.
Hi Everyone!
A year ago I bugged dashorst about why Wicket didn't participate in the
08 GSoC.. This year I've been brainstorming on ideas and want to see
what others think could be useful projects for Wicket.
Thanks
./Christopher
Peter Thomas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:26 AM, C. Bergström cbergst...@netsyncro.comwrote:
Hi Everyone!
A year ago I bugged dashorst about why Wicket didn't participate in the 08
GSoC.. This year I've been brainstorming on ideas and want to see what
others think could be useful
Johan Compagner wrote:
They are busy making it a standaard in the next servlet spec
Jetty 7 will use servlet spec 3.0 (which is still in draft) Anyone
feeling daring can test it.
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/JETTY/Downloading+Jetty
./C
Frank Bille wrote:
For the Maven and Ivy fans out there: update your pom's to the following,
and everything will be downloaded automatically:
dependency
groupIdorg.apache.wicket/groupId
artifactIdwicket/artifactId
version1.3.0-beta4/version
/dependency
chickabee wrote:
Yes, Now the urls are like:
https://lilo:8443/whisky/app/plist/.1.2
https://lilo:8443/whisky/app/plist/.1.3 ...etc...these are much better than
earlier. thx.
However, they are not bookmarkable, if I start the new browser and point the
folloing url:
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
-igor
On 9/8/07, C. Bergström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
chickabee wrote:
Hi Wicketers,
snip /
-Thumbs Down to Wicket!
Patches welcome (:
we dont want a build.xml contribution. we can write one ourselves if need
be. we are simply
Johan Compagner wrote:
hi,
I can organize one if there is enough interest
Martijn and i will be there then.
And for example if people are also interested in the wicket security i will
also drag Maurice to the table.
I can attend while I'm in the Netherlands and will probably drag
On 9/6/07, cowwoc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This might be of interest to the Wicket community:
If you really think about this.. It just means that it takes more
developers (jobs) in order to accomplish the same thing it takes with
just a handful of wicket developers :P So I guess if
Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail wrote:
1.3 beta 2.
I don't think it's a bug.
I don't know if it's related, but there's 100% a set focus bug between
1.2.6 and 1.3. I've got a patch that works for me, but it will almost
certainly break something else... If you have success with this please
Maurice Marrink wrote:
Please remove the users, or at least me from the sourceforge lists :)
Per the headers for anyone interested..
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think hitting reply all to this email should work..
./C
-
To
13 matches
Mail list logo
