you have form onsubmit=something(); without
returning anything. Since 'if (undefined)' is 'false' the call stops
there.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com
wrote:
and in what case does it not return anything?
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Martin Grigorov
can proceed.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade from 1.4.8 to 1.4.18 and I'm finding that
AjaxSubmitLink is not working (at least with one form).
The form doesn't get submitted - the problem in wicket-ajax.js is (~line
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade from 1.4.8 to 1.4.18 and I'm finding that
AjaxSubmitLink is not working (at least with one form).
The form doesn't get submitted - the problem in wicket-ajax.js is (~line 1120):
// Submits a form using ajax.
// This method serializes a form and sends it as
Hi Jeremy,
did you find a solution as we've had the problem for a long time now
and more and more people are reporting it as they move over to FF and
Chrome?
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
Perhaps this thread will help:
just to say we still have this issue and its getting more and more
worse as people are moving to FF and Chrome.
We have no idea how to solve as we cannot reproduce it consistently.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I thought you might
Hi,
We have a form that you can make comments in against something. This
is submitted normally via a AjaxSubmitLink, however if you attach a
file to the form then then form is submitted in a normal non-ajax
request.
The problem I'm seeing is if a form is marked as multipart/form-data
then is
Hi,
I love using wicket (1.4) its by far the best web framework for java I
have used. However the one thing that really is hard work is the url
handling for me.
Our users all the time want to copy and paste the url of a given page
in to an email or use in a comment to link to something in the
of the onSubmit, or onClick we don't call
setResponsePage. Should be call setResponsePage to get the
bookmarkable url?
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
2- is there a better
the call to
transport send.
Our only conclusion is that is must be a javascript engine bug, we
just surprised this has never reported before as its not a wicket bug
.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
we've upgraded the apache to 2.2.15
Hi,
I just want to check that there isn't an alternative out there already
that someone has done that supports webkit browsers?
We're finding nearly 20% of our users now are on these browsers so we
must support them better, hence why we're looking at alternatives.
If not we'll have to write
...@gmail.com
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I just want to check that there isn't an alternative out there already
that someone has done that supports webkit browsers
Hi,
we recently introduced a extensions.markup.html.tree.Tree component in
our product.
However we're seeing some errors in production where the nodeLink in
the component cannot be found in the page.
In our onNodeLinkClicked we just perform a setResponsePage with a
bookmarkable page.
I've done
We use the excellent wurfl open source project to help us out with devices.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:49 PM, jcgarciam jcgarc...@gmail.com wrote:
In server side, just check the User-Agent header from your HttpRequest.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Madlip89 [via Apache Wicket]
or something weird.
-igor
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks Igor,
I've just spent a few hours stepping though the code and I cannot see
anyway the content type could be set wrong - I see the content type is
set in the final respond(requestCycle) method
Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
see AjaxRequestTarget class, this is where the response is generated
on the serverside
wicket-ajax.js is where it is processed on the client side.
-igor
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Igor,
Whats odd
type issue, but it is still weird because the
response is received by the xml http request object, not the browser
directly. strange indeed.
-igor
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
has anyone had this issue? We're getting emails from our users
Hi,
has anyone had this issue? We're getting emails from our users that
sometime when clicking on an ajax link the raw wicket ajax response is
being rendered on the browser - ie the just see all the html source
code on the page. Its not any particular page.
Anyone seen this or has any ideas?
We're on 1.4.7 currently and when I tried 1.4.11 we had a few issues
with ajax - unfortunality we've not had time to really try and
understand the issue.
I'll be interested if anyone else is having a problem.
I know there was some work done in the ajax area, but I'm not sure
where to start
Hi,
we see this error time to time in production, and one of use here got
the problem ourselves.
We have a Form set to multipart true and a FileUploadField and
SubmitLink amongst some other fields, however there is no ajax submit.
This works 99% of the time it seems.
Now this happened using
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Jeremy,
That is the id for the wicket extend tag in your markup
This might be a stupid question - but can I tell where in the page
at 7:47 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
That is the id for the wicket extend tag in your markup
Jeremy Thomerson
http://wickettraining.com
-- sent from my smart phone, so please excuse spelling, formatting, or
compiler errors
On Oct 19, 2010 12:46 PM, Wayne W
Hi,
I've got a problem in production whereby our application home page
throws a :Unable to find component with id 'mainPanel' in
[MarkupContainer [Component id = _extend48]]
This only happens once or twice a week. We don't have any components
named '_extend48' or similar anywhere in the code.
/wicket:panel
124 /body
125 /html
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Would you show the html of this mainpanel and also its super panel?
**
Martin
2010/10/19 Wayne W waynemailingli...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I've got
101 - 123 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
