Re: Is Wicket In Action still relevant?

, such as CSP and the way resources are loaded is slightly different IIRC. But if you want to get someone to grasp the basics of Wicket, it is a really good resource. I'm a fan. - Stan James Selvakumar schreef op 2023-05-11 10:29: Hi all, Just wondering whether Wicket in Action is still

Re: Wicket on low end hardware

think there's something fishy going on. But I have not been able put my finger on it yet. I will just keep on debugging for a day or two I guess. Maybe I will be able to file for a bug if I get to the bottom of this. Thanks. Stan Martin Grigorov schreef op 2023-01-06 15:01: Please explain

Re: Wicket on low end hardware

t tells me that my application has about 85 *.properties files. Stan Martin Grigorov schreef op 2023-01-06 12:59: On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 11:44 AM wrote: Hi all, As I was implementing markup caching by adding it directly to the MarkupCache, I found my gains weren't as big as I had expected (I guess

Re: Wicket on low end hardware

().getStringResourceLoaders().add(new BundleStringResourceLoader("RebrandSubcontractorName")); A quick count tells me that my application has about 85 *.properties files. Stan Martin Grigorov schreef op 2023-01-06 12:59: On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 11:44 AM wrote: Hi all, As I was implementing mark

Re: Wicket on low end hardware

into this deeper and found that the first call to Localizer->getString() on our hardware takes between 1500 and 2000ms. I then started to investigate if this can also be preloaded but I am having a hard time coming up with something effective. Does anyone have experience with this? Thanks. S

Re: Wicket on low end hardware

claim that it is possible to do this on a different thread. As you may notice, I had to change the SessionStoreProvider to make this work. If I am correct that means that as long as this method runs, all sessions will be handled by the MockSessionStore. Stan Anna Eileen Eileen schreef op 2023

Re: Wicket on low end hardware

thinks I might be leaving some stuff on the table, I would be open to hire someone to do some consulting work on this. Please get in touch with me if you are interested. Cheers. Stan Martin Terra schreef op 2023-01-02 04:29: Anything in wicket can be preloaded, but as premature

Re: Wicket on low end hardware

pot on. Instead of hoping for the golden lottery ticket, it is probably better for me to just spend half a day profiling and then ask a well researched question. So I guess I figured out what I'll be doing tomorrow morning ;-). Thanks! Stan Anna Eileen schreef op 2023-01-02 02:19: Hello Would

Wicket on low end hardware

for this. Thanks, Stan

Why aren't setEnabled and setVisible model based?

can't 'setVisible' and 'setEnabled' be controlled using IModel arguments? Is there a technical limitation here? Or is it just a quirk? Thanks. Stan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional

Re: Howto override markup

My case isn't so simple. I need all component from Page1 when i render Page2, but components from Page2 should be placed in various places. Simple example: Viewing Page1 gives: body blah, blah this is first component from page 1 this is second component from page 1 /body Viewing

Howto override markup

Hallo, please advice. I have BasePage, Page1 and Page2. Page2 extends Page1, Page1 extends BasePage. When is Page1 opened, his markup is placed into BasePage instead wicket:child/. But doesn't work identically for Page2. How can I do this? Thanks. -- View this message in context: