you can mock statict classes with power mock , but i'vé come to the
konklusion that it is a code smell going that way ioc are much better.
-from my htc
2009/5/15, James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:18 PM, alf.redo
alfredo.alean...@logobject.ch wrote:
Thank
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 2:39 PM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
you can mock statict classes with power mock , but i'vé come to the
konklusion that it is a code smell going that way ioc are much better.
Right, I didn't say it was impossible. I said it would be more
Hi,
I have a doubt about application-scoped objects.
What's the pro and cons of setting an object instance into my
WebApplication class or define that class as singleton (using a static
method to access it) ?
Thank you
alf
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Alfredo Aleandri
alfredo.alean...@logobject.ch wrote:
Hi,
I have a doubt about application-scoped objects.
What is your doubt?
What's the pro and cons of setting an object instance into my WebApplication
class or define that class as singleton (using a static
Alfredo Aleandri wrote:
I have a doubt about application-scoped objects.
What's the pro and cons of setting an object instance into my
WebApplication class or define that class as singleton (using a static
method to access it) ?
Pro: Singletons are easy to use
Contra: They make Unit tests
:
http://www.nabble.com/Application-scope-vs-Singleton-tp23559402p23562038.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands
...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Application-scope-vs-Singleton-tp23559402p23562038.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
Use injection. The difference is that there is no way to override the
implementation of the static accessor / singleton for testing
functionality. If you instead use an IoC container (Spring / Guice)
and
(and not store it in
WebApplication). Can be some problems about thread-safety or other issue
in one case rather than the other?
I'm sorry if this seems to be a stupid question...
alf
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Application-scope-vs-Singleton-tp23559402p23563036.html
Sent
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:18 PM, alf.redo
alfredo.alean...@logobject.ch wrote:
Thank you to all for your precious suggestions.
My question is not for a real need.
Supposing to discard the injection strategy, I would like to know if the
cache of an object into my WebApplication class during
10 matches
Mail list logo