I just noticed it :-(. Thanks very much. This is exactly what I am looking for
but did not find it in the ebooks I bought. This will be one of my wicket bible
pieces and probably I would keep complaining to get more messages from saints.
Apologies in advance.
>have you noticed that no one else i
have you noticed that no one else is finding this particularly hard?
class dataconverter implements imodel {
final imodel model;
public dataconverter(imodel model) { this.model=model; }
public void detach() { model.detach(); }
public Object getObject() { return convertToComponent(model.g
Mine is not working. I feel these "basic" data manipulation tasks
are little to "heavy" in Wicket. Some built-in custom/helper classes
could help a bit. I found I am writing many of these kind of custom
class to do basic conversion and still have to worry if I am doing right,
like the detach() me
wondering if that really always works.
looking at the current getConverter doc:
/**
* CheckBox will by default always just use the boolean converter
because the implementation
* expects that the string is can be converted to a boolean [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Strings#isTrue(String)}
*
I just tested and it worked. Thanks very much.
Pardon me for being stubbon here. For a simple
convertion like this, So much has to be created so it seems a little heavy
weight.
For this one,
first a subclass of Checkbox (possibly creating multiple constructors)
overide initmodel and separate cust
what i have shown you will work independently of the fact that you are
sure or not :)
-igor
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:51 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not sure how this would solve my problem
> I intend to only use
> new CheckBox("checked") without adding any other arguments
> since
I am not sure how this would solve my problem
I intend to only use
new CheckBox("checked") without adding any other arguments
since I expect it to resolve the form's compoundpropertymodel
whose object is entitybean with "checked" as column name.
>or you can simply do:
>
>class YesNoCheckBox ex
or you can simply do:
class YesNoCheckBox extends CheckBox {
protected IModel initModel() {
return new CheckBoxYesNoModel(super.initModel());
}
}
-igor
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:29 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Use model decorator sometimes seems troublesome.
> I need to use a for
Use model decorator sometimes seems troublesome.
I need to use a form containing a lot of checkboxes and other types
with compoundproperty model with a entity bean, say record.
Most formcoponent ids are identical to their record property name,
such as Textfield("firstName") and record also has "fir
Thanks. I'd prefer a custom checkbox class with converter. I just created a
test class as below but not working. Appreciate any pointers.
I did not find an example to follow.
public class CheckBoxYN extends CheckBox{
public CheckBoxYN(String id){
super(id);
}
@Overrid
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> you forgot the important detach() { room.detach(); }
Oops, good catch.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you forgot the important detach() { room.detach(); }
-igor
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Timo Rantalaiho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Is there built-in mechanism to auto convert the checkbox model value
> > to be a character set Y/N or Ye
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there built-in mechanism to auto convert the checkbox model value
> to be a character set Y/N or Yes/No or any other pairs?
> This is frequently used pattern.
Probably you could set your own IConverter on the component
corresponding the checkbox
Hello:
Is there built-in mechanism to auto convert the checkbox model value to be a
character set Y/N or Yes/No or any other pairs?
This is frequently used pattern.
Thanks.
14 matches
Mail list logo
