Hi,
I read this post
http://ptrthomas.wordpress.com/2009/09/14/perfbench-update-tapestry-5-and-grails/
and he suggested to use HttpSessionStore instead of the second cache...
I looked into the javadoc and the code itself and understood the
differences.
However, can anyone explain in a bit more
There really is no good reason to use http session store instead of
secondlevelcachesessionstore unless you are experiencing performance
problems. HttpSessionStore uses more memory and keeps much shorter
history so your users will be experiencing page expiration much more
often.
-Matej
On Tue,
And that back and forward buttons in the browser dont really work well in
the HttpSessionStore
But i cant believe that the overhead he is reporting is really the
overhead..
It could be an Antivirus checker or other stuff like that.
Besides that if that would be a problem just get an SSD and
Well,
there are two kinds of overhead with SecondLevelCacheSessionStore.
Object serialization and writing to disk. I can imagine antivirus
interfering with the writing.
-Matej
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
And that back and forward buttons in the
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com wrote:
Well,
there are two kinds of overhead with SecondLevelCacheSessionStore.
Object serialization and writing to disk. I can imagine antivirus
interfering with the writing.
I did mention in comment #2 under the blog post
Thank you all.
This thread was very informative and educated.
Peter, I will try the two suggestions you've mentioned.
Eyal Golan
egola...@gmail.com
Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74
P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's
