[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 11:47 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: IChoiceRenderer: RadioGroup CheckBoxMultipleChoice
if you use an ldm in choice/choicegroup then you should have instance
equality available since you will probably load the objects from
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: IChoiceRenderer: RadioGroup CheckBoxMultipleChoice
if you use an ldm in choice/choicegroup then you should have instance
equality available since you will probably load the objects from the
same place, so during request processing they are consistent.
as far
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 7:16 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: IChoiceRenderer: RadioGroup CheckBoxMultipleChoice
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's strange that that kind of functionality is provided when multiple
yes, that will work in my example, but what if MyObjectOption is not
part of my namespace?
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 10:14 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: IChoiceRenderer: RadioGroup CheckBoxMultipleChoice
why
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 11:12 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: IChoiceRenderer: RadioGroup CheckBoxMultipleChoice
then use loadable detachable models that will ensure instance equality.
we can let the group take a comparator, but its yet another
complication. i see
the issue. Could you elaborate?
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 11:12 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: IChoiceRenderer: RadioGroup CheckBoxMultipleChoice
then use loadable detachable models that will ensure instance
a
LoadableDetachableModel to solve the issue. Could you elaborate?
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 11:12 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: IChoiceRenderer: RadioGroup CheckBoxMultipleChoice
then use loadable detachable models
IClusterable
{
String getIdValue(Object object, int index);
}
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 11:47 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: IChoiceRenderer: RadioGroup CheckBoxMultipleChoice
if you use an ldm in choice
: Friday, May 16, 2008 12:16 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: IChoiceRenderer: RadioGroup CheckBoxMultipleChoice
afaik value is not used in checkbox or radio, not even sure that its
valid to have it.
iidentfierrenderer is a bad name since the id isnt actually rendered...
-igor
On Fri, May
For consistency sake, wouldn't it be wise to use IChoiceRenderer for
RadioGroup and CheckBoxMultipleChoice? Seems like a natural solution to
override IChoiceRenderer#getIdValue(...) to infer IDs for selection
comparison the same way that it is being done in DropDownChoice.
Otherwise, how else can
checkboxmultiplechoice uses ichoicerenderer afaik, did you mean checkgroup?
radiogroup/checkgroup work differently, they leave all text generation
up to the user so no choice renderer is required.
-igor
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For consistency
: Thursday, May 15, 2008 4:47 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: IChoiceRenderer: RadioGroup CheckBoxMultipleChoice
checkboxmultiplechoice uses ichoicerenderer afaik, did you mean
checkgroup?
radiogroup/checkgroup work differently, they leave all text generation
up to the user so no choice
Subject: Re: IChoiceRenderer: RadioGroup CheckBoxMultipleChoice
well, the whole point of radio/check group is to allow user complete
control over markup. the whole point of choice renderer is to automate
markup generation, so there is just a big mismatch. eg i always use
radio/check group when using
/Check, not the Radio/Check instance itself...
-igor
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 5:50 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: IChoiceRenderer: RadioGroup CheckBoxMultipleChoice
well, the whole point of radio/check
14 matches
Mail list logo
