If you want to avoid mixing HTML and Java, you could write your
component with using a templating engine, such as Velocity or
Freemarker.
I believe there is wicket-velocity project somewhere that provides for
example Panels that can render Velocity templates files.
br, Juha
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010
Hi,
I have a question on how to address a certain problem that arose in my current
project: we have a two-dimensional array with a variable number of rows and
columns
(not exactly rocket science, I know) that needs to be rendered in an HTML table
where
each cell is currently represented by a
Could you use a PageableListView or does that not fall within your business
requirements?
Josh
-Original Message-
From: d...@agentlab.de [mailto:d...@agentlab.de]
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:08 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Large number components and redering time
Hi!
Did you jprofile where the time is spent?
**
Martin
2010/2/17 d...@agentlab.de:
Hi,
I have a question on how to address a certain problem that arose in my
current
project: we have a two-dimensional array with a variable number of rows and
columns
(not exactly rocket science, I know)
business
requirements?
Josh
-Original Message-
From: d...@agentlab.de [mailto:d...@agentlab.de]
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:08 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Large number components and redering time
Hi,
I have a question on how to address a certain problem that arose
: d...@agentlab.de [mailto:d...@agentlab.de]
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:08 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Large number components and redering time
Hi,
I have a question on how to address a certain problem that arose in my
current
project: we have a two
I set up a WicketTester Testcase and used Eclipse TPTP to look into the
app. Over 90% were spent in beforeRender calls... However, since the load
that was produced by running the testcase within a monitored environment
brought my computer to its knees, I will have to dwell deeper into the
problem
wrote:
Could you use a PageableListView or does that not fall within your
business
requirements?
Josh
-Original Message-
From: d...@agentlab.de [mailto:d...@agentlab.de] Sent: Wednesday, February
17, 2010 12:08 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Large number components
@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Large number components and redering time
Hi,
I have a question on how to address a certain problem that arose in my
current
project: we have a two-dimensional array with a variable number of rows
and columns
(not exactly rocket science, I know) that needs to be rendered
a PageableListView or does that not fall within your
business
requirements?
Josh
-Original Message-
From: d...@agentlab.de [mailto:d...@agentlab.de] Sent: Wednesday, February
17, 2010 12:08 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Large number components and redering time
Hi,
I have a question on how
i would imagine you would have the same problem even in a local
environment such as swing...
the solution is quiet simple, instead of using wicket components to
model the table and the cell simply use a single component that writes
out html for the entire table.
-igor
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Large number components and redering time
Hi,
I have a question on how to address a certain problem that arose in my
current
project: we have a two-dimensional array with a variable number of rows
and
columns
(not exactly rocket science, I know
components and redering time
Hi,
I have a question on how to address a certain problem that arose in my
current
project: we have a two-dimensional array with a variable number of rows
and
columns
(not exactly rocket science, I know) that needs to be rendered in an
HTML
table where
each cell
Swing uses a variety of TableCellRenderer on a per table instance
basis. What component are you suggesting to use for this behavior in
Wicket?
Bernard
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:04:09 -0800, you wrote:
i would imagine you would have the same problem even in a local
environment such as swing...
the
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:31 PM, b...@actrix.gen.nz wrote:
Swing uses a variety of TableCellRenderer on a per table instance
basis.
if you had a table cell that needed a button then you wouldnt use a renderer
What component are you suggesting to use for this behavior in
Wicket?
a
In case of repeated buttons I think I would use a combination of a
TableCellEditor and a TableCellRenderer with a button behind them,
still only single instances serving many rows. There would only be a
single event listener that would check selected row index. Would it
make sense to have that in
we already provide support for all this...
class cheaprenderer implements ilinklistener {
protected void oncomponenttagbody(...) {
...
getresponse.write(href=\);
getresponsr.write(urlfor(this, ilinklistener.interface)+x=+x+y=+y));
}
public final void onclick() {
Many thanks. I like it. Good when memory is expensive :)
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:21:16 -0800, you wrote:
we already provide support for all this...
class cheaprenderer implements ilinklistener {
protected void oncomponenttagbody(...) {
...
getresponse.write(href=\);
Hi,
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
i would imagine you would have the same problem even in a local
environment such as swing...
absolutely, I was just wondering what would be the best way to do it in
Wicket...
the solution is quiet simple, instead of using wicket components to
model the table and the
19 matches
Mail list logo
