Honestly in our application (we have a roadmap for scalability) we are
likely to get several hundred concurrent sessions per server with a few kb
of state stored in the HTTPSession. Its not that much.
That's definitively no problem for even a very modest setup.
What I was more
concerned
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Moving-from-Tapestry-to-Wicket--tp20254394p20328386.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive
stateful components.
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Moving-from-Tapestry-to-Wicket
/Moving-from-Tapestry-to-Wicket--tp20254394p20291214.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
In my experience, almost two years using it, Wicket has a rather
stable-backwarks-compatible API. Maybe the biggest API break I have
experienced was when branch 2.0 was declared a dead end and early 2.0
adopters had to re-adapt their code back to 1.3.x... Even migrating to
1.4 generics was
1) Utilize HTML templates (which you do, I understand).
All good
2) Utilize CSS (which you do) files externally for my artist.
All good
3) Utilize Javascript (which I assume you do).
All good, and excellent support for integration creating your own ajax
components.
4) Utilize a Java, component
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 4:24 PM, GK1971 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
You are possibly correct. My main concern is that I have to upgrade from
Tapestry 4 to... something. Given that Tapestry 5 is not compatible in the
least I have allowed myself to look at the options.
Well, the backward
]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Moving-from-Tapestry-to-Wicket--tp20254394p20254748.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Moving-from-Tapestry-to-Wicket--tp20254394p20254748.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Moving-from-Tapestry-to-Wicket--tp20254394p20254748.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e
this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Moving-from-Tapestry-to-Wicket--tp20254394p20254748.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
Regards, Graeme.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Moving-from-Tapestry-to-Wicket
://www.nabble.com/Moving-from-Tapestry-to-Wicket--tp20254394p20254748.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Moving-from-Tapestry-to-Wicket--tp20254394p2026.html
Sent from the Wicket - User
, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Moving-from-Tapestry-to-Wicket--tp20254394p20254748.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
I have a complex table and many links on the page that are not
book-markable. Will that be a problem in terms of too much session
information?
The default session store in Wicket saves history in some temp files
and only holds the current page in memory (well, the current page of
any page map
experience for my users (which I guess you do).
I have just purchased Wicket in Action so as I can do some research, but I
do appreciate your time if possible.
Many thanks for your help, and your help.
Regards, Graeme.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Moving-from-Tapestry-to-Wicket
I actually read your mail but I didn't quite get it, what is your main
concern?
It seems to me like Wicket would be a perfect fit to your four criteria.
// Daniel
jalbum.net
On 2008-10-30, at 21:05, GK1971 wrote:
Hi. I hope this email is appropriate for the forum - its my first time
PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Moving-from-Tapestry-to-Wicket--tp20254394p20254748.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
19 matches
Mail list logo