Re: Pros and cons of WicketBench

2008-05-03 Thread Gerolf Seitz
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: however, it does have its problems. eclipse' java editor is not built with embedding in mind, so once you start using (2) you will miss out on such useful things as mark occurences, double clicking the left border to set

Re: Pros and cons of WicketBench

2008-05-03 Thread Igor Vaynberg
the problem is i dont know eclipse internals that well. i think if johan, or anyone else was interested in spending time on it all he would have to do to check this out is to create a new eclipse plugin from the tabbed editor plugin wizard and then try to embed the java editor as one of the panes.

Pros and cons of WicketBench

2008-05-02 Thread Frank Silbermann
When I was developing in Wicket 1.2 I used Jbuilder 2006; it was what the employer provided. Other developers, however, use Eclipse for their (non-Wicket) projects, and Jbuilder 2007/8 are Eclipse-based, so I figured might might as well start my Wicket 1.3 experiments using Eclipse. What are

Re: Pros and cons of WicketBench

2008-05-02 Thread Igor Vaynberg
for me there are two cool aspects to wicket-bench: 1) refactor support - if you rename a class that extends Component it will find any matching .html and .properties file and rename those also 2) editor - wicketbench replaces java editor with a tabbed editor that lets you quickly switch between