Re: Advisory question

2008-05-03 Thread Eelco Hillenius
> My web app background is from page oriented frameworks, and now while > using wicket, I find myself creating pages over and over. > I think I can miss many of them, because most of the time all I do is > adding an intelligent reusable component to it. I'm mostly using panels/ go for the smal

RE: Advisory question

2008-05-02 Thread Jonathan Locke
.apache.org > Subject: Re: Advisory question > > The nice thing about wicket is that it will give you freedom to choose > whatever you like. > You can create individual pages but if you markup is mostly the same it > is easy to to use markup inheritance from a single basepage. > Y

RE: Advisory question

2008-05-02 Thread Frank Silbermann
So when do we get the Addison-Wesley book on _Wicket_Patterns_? :-) -Original Message- From: Maurice Marrink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 5:51 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Advisory question The nice thing about wicket is that it will give you

Re: Advisory question

2008-05-02 Thread Martijn Lindhout
thanx, I know the inheritance thing and I'm actually using is. I'm just curious what others are doing ;-) 2008/5/2 Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The nice thing about wicket is that it will give you freedom to choose > whatever you like. > You can create individual pages but if you marku

Re: Advisory question

2008-05-02 Thread Maurice Marrink
The nice thing about wicket is that it will give you freedom to choose whatever you like. You can create individual pages but if you markup is mostly the same it is easy to to use markup inheritance from a single basepage. You can also have just one page and replace panels as required. It is all a