I think the best solution is combine JCR and relation database. Some data
store to JCR (on filesystem) a some to database. But question is for which
kind of data si better JCR. My opinion is that data like photos, blogs,
comments is better store in JCR and data like users, roles, classifiers is
@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: OT: Relational database + Hibenate vs Content Repository
(Jackrabbit)
I think the best solution is combine JCR and relation database. Some
data
store to JCR (on filesystem) a some to database. But question is for
which
kind of data si better JCR. My opinion is that data
:31 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: OT: Relational database + Hibenate vs Content Repository
(Jackrabbit)
I think the best solution is combine JCR and relation database. Some
data
store to JCR (on filesystem) a some to database. But question is for
which
kind of data si better JCR
the content in Jackrabbit but really
looking for something pre-built.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Swank [mailto:scott.sw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 11:44 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: OT: Relational database + Hibenate vs Content Repository
(Jackrabbit
Anybody have thoughts on this? I am curious also.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:27 AM, danisevsky danisev...@gmail.com wrote:
Hallo, I am thinking about learning and using Jackrabbit instead of
relational database (+ Hibernate) in my new wicket
