Re: disabling ajax submit button

2012-09-17 Thread Anna Simbirtsev
in your Java code? > > What's the HTML mark-up you use with the Java code you showed us? > > ~ Thank you, > Paul Bors > > -Original Message- > From: Anna Simbirtsev [mailto:asimbirt...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 3:28 PM > To: users@wicket.ap

RE: disabling ajax submit button

2012-09-13 Thread Paul Bors
- From: Anna Simbirtsev [mailto:asimbirt...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 3:28 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: disabling ajax submit button it does not work On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:53 AM, vineet semwal wrote: > that should have worked... btw why not just butt

Re: disabling ajax submit button

2012-09-13 Thread Anna Simbirtsev
it does not work On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:53 AM, vineet semwal wrote: > that should have worked... btw why not just button.setEnabled(false) ? > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Anna Simbirtsev > wrote: > > I am using wicket 1.4.3 > > and changing to the code you mentioned below, does not w

Re: disabling ajax submit button

2012-09-13 Thread vineet semwal
that should have worked... btw why not just button.setEnabled(false) ? On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Anna Simbirtsev wrote: > I am using wicket 1.4.3 > and changing to the code you mentioned below, does not work as well:( > > Thanks > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Sébastien Gautrin > wr

Re: disabling ajax submit button

2012-09-13 Thread Anna Simbirtsev
I am using wicket 1.4.3 and changing to the code you mentioned below, does not work as well:( Thanks On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Sébastien Gautrin wrote: > Which wicket version ? (I ask because I see you are using several calls > that are deprecated in 1.5). > Besides, within the declarat

Re: disabling ajax submit button

2012-09-12 Thread Sébastien Gautrin
Which wicket version ? (I ask because I see you are using several calls that are deprecated in 1.5). Besides, within the declaration of your inner class, don't try to access the variable you are defining (and without declaring it final, it should normally not compile anyway). Not changing the d