Re: Page Expired page with PatternDateConverter

2010-10-12 Thread Altuğ Bilgin Altıntaş
quickstart 11 Ekim 2010 16:00 tarihinde Hemant Shah prot...@gmail.com yazdı: Yes, it works fine if we do not override the getConverter method. In which case it behaves like a normal AjaxEditableLabel, as would be expected, and we are using AjaxEditableLabel instances in many places in our

Re: Page Expired page with PatternDateConverter

2010-10-11 Thread Altuğ Bilgin Altıntaş
if you don't override IConverter then everything works fine ? 2010/10/11 Hemant Shah prot...@gmail.com Altuğ, thanks for responding. There are no errors reported in the log. All the classes in the project are serializable. Could this be a bug? Regards, Hemant On 10/10/2010 5:03

Re: Page Expired page with PatternDateConverter

2010-10-11 Thread Hemant Shah
Yes, it works fine if we do not override the getConverter method. In which case it behaves like a normal AjaxEditableLabel, as would be expected, and we are using AjaxEditableLabel instances in many places in our application. - Hemant On 10/11/2010 6:24 AM, Altuğ Bilgin Altıntaş wrote: if

Re: Page Expired page with PatternDateConverter

2010-10-10 Thread Altuğ Bilgin Altıntaş
Did you look at Wicket's logs ? Be sure serialization is done correctly. 2010/10/10 Hemant Shah prot...@gmail.com I am new to the Wicket framework and I hope I can get some help with a problem I am facing. I am using version 1.4.12. I am overriding the AjaxEditableLabel class and its

Re: Page Expired page with PatternDateConverter

2010-10-10 Thread Hemant Shah
Altuğ, thanks for responding. There are no errors reported in the log. All the classes in the project are serializable. Could this be a bug? Regards, Hemant On 10/10/2010 5:03 PM, Altuğ Bilgin Altıntaş wrote: Did you look at Wicket's logs ? Be sure serialization is done correctly.

Re: Page in Page

2010-05-31 Thread Christian Märzinger
. -Original Message- From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com] Sent: Friday, 28 May 2010 8:40 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Page in Page On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.comwrote: Wicket (just like Java) does

Re: Page in Page

2010-05-27 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Christian Märzinger christian.maerzin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! How can I embedd a page in another page? i have following Homepage wicket div id=header class=borderedBlock table width=100% header text br / header text 2 /table /div table

RE: Page in Page

2010-05-27 Thread Chris Colman
Wicket (just like Java) does not support multiple inheritance. If you're creating a base page that has two blocks that need to be filled in, you can: I agree that wicket shouldn't support multiple inheritance but I'm not sure that what is required here is multiple inheritance. In the wicket

Re: Page in Page

2010-05-27 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.comwrote: Wicket (just like Java) does not support multiple inheritance. If you're creating a base page that has two blocks that need to be filled in, you can: I agree that wicket shouldn't support multiple

RE: Page in Page

2010-05-27 Thread Chris Colman
page directly extends only one other page and that constraint is clearly not violated by having multiple overridable sections. -Original Message- From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com] Sent: Friday, 28 May 2010 8:40 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Page in Page

Re: Page in Page

2010-05-27 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
...@wickettraining.com] Sent: Friday, 28 May 2010 8:40 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Page in Page On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.comwrote: Wicket (just like Java) does not support multiple inheritance. If you're creating a base page