Re: Wicket 1.4M3 migration

2008-07-23 Thread Ned Collyer
I've just converted over a project to 1.4-m3 from m1. I skipped m2 because of the drastic changes between 1, 2 and 3. I must say, I think generics at a component level - when I initially started using it felt like unneeded overhead - but it became more and more useful. now that I've

Re: Wicket 1.4M3 migration

2008-07-23 Thread Ned Collyer
Thinking about this - generifying panel would probably fix it - or i can just make my own base panel with generics. Ned Collyer wrote: I've just converted over a project to 1.4-m3 from m1. I skipped m2 because of the drastic changes between 1, 2 and 3. I must say, I think generics

Re: Wicket 1.4M3 migration

2008-07-23 Thread Anders Peterson
I used M2 and had no problem with it. When I heard talk about decoupling the components and the models, for M3, I thought that seemed a good idea. Now I use M3. It works fine, but I think generics for components is implemented upside down. I think M3 should have been M2 with generics turned

Re: Wicket 1.4M3 migration

2008-07-20 Thread Timo Rantalaiho
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Stefan Lindner wrote: Thank you all for your work on wicket! Maybe we can see Wicket 1.4.0 final in the near future? Thanks for the feedback and the thanks! There are still 30+ open issues for 1.4