Re: setSerializeSessionAttributes in wicket-1.3.0-beta2

2007-08-16 Thread Alex Objelean
Eelco, you're right! The latest profiling shows where the bottleneck is... it is indeed not where I was looking for. I thought it was because of serialization because when using 1.2.x branch i found out that setSerializeSessionAttributes(false) improved a lot application responsiveness. Thank

Re: setSerializeSessionAttributes in wicket-1.3.0-beta2

2007-08-16 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Eelco, you're right! The latest profiling shows where the bottleneck is... it is indeed not where I was looking for. I thought it was because of serialization because when using 1.2.x branch i found out that setSerializeSessionAttributes(false) improved a lot application responsiveness.

Re: setSerializeSessionAttributes in wicket-1.3.0-beta2

2007-08-16 Thread Alex Objelean
Well, in this case the bottleneck was caused by an expensive call which was not cashed inside a very long list... Anyway, profiling tools helps very much in such cases, so I would recommend everybody who have performance issues to use it. :) Eelco Hillenius wrote: Eelco, you're right! The

Re: setSerializeSessionAttributes in wicket-1.3.0-beta2

2007-08-16 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Well, in this case the bottleneck was caused by an expensive call which was not cashed inside a very long list... Anyway, profiling tools helps very much in such cases, so I would recommend everybody who have performance issues to use it. :) Yeah, for sure. Which tool are you using? We are

Re: setSerializeSessionAttributes in wicket-1.3.0-beta2

2007-08-16 Thread Alex Objelean
Me too :)... YourKit rocks! :) Eelco Hillenius wrote: Well, in this case the bottleneck was caused by an expensive call which was not cashed inside a very long list... Anyway, profiling tools helps very much in such cases, so I would recommend everybody who have performance issues to use

Re: setSerializeSessionAttributes in wicket-1.3.0-beta2

2007-08-15 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Eelco, the ISessionStore interface has a lot of methods.. can you give me an example of how to get rid of the serialization? It really slows down the application. I can imagine those checks did cost something in 1.2, though with Wicket 1.3 and the way we use it with the session stores should

Re: setSerializeSessionAttributes in wicket-1.3.0-beta2

2007-08-14 Thread Eelco Hillenius
On 8/14/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In wicket-1.2.6 I used this in order to not serialize session attributes: [CODE] getDebugSettings().setSerializeSessionAttributes(false); [/CODE] What is equivalent for this in wicket-1.3.0-beta2? Thank you! There is none, but if you

Re: setSerializeSessionAttributes in wicket-1.3.0-beta2

2007-08-14 Thread Eelco Hillenius
On 8/14/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/14/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In wicket-1.2.6 I used this in order to not serialize session attributes: [CODE] getDebugSettings().setSerializeSessionAttributes(false); [/CODE] What is equivalent for this in