Re: wicketstuff-minis status?

Yes, they changed the mootools a lot. I haven't had time to look into it, nor search for something else as I'm approaching my deadline. So I'm probably just going to go with the old mootools 1.1, as this already works. Thanks for checking, though! Natalie -- View this message in context:

Re: wicketstuff-minis status?

No problem. If you at somepoint discover a tooltip that are upto date or more close to the core of a jslib (yui, dojo or jquery, mootools) that are integrative with wicket please write this list. -Nino 2010/5/7 nmetzger nmetz...@odu.edu: Yes, they changed the mootools a lot. I haven't had time

Re: wicketstuff-minis status?

, Natalie J. Subject: Re: wicketstuff-minis status? Well I have nothing planed but as I dont think it'll take me long I'll look into and see i can do it soon. Are you needing it right now or? 2010/5/3 nmetzger [hidden email]/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2131419i=0: Hi Nino

Re: wicketstuff-minis status?

Well I have nothing planed but as I dont think it'll take me long I'll look into and see i can do it soon. Are you needing it right now or? 2010/5/3 nmetzger nmetz...@odu.edu: Hi Nino, is there any update planned for mootools 1.2.4? Thanks, Natalie -- View this message in context:

Re: wicketstuff-minis status?

Hmm a 2 second search brought this up http://www.uhleeka.com/blog/2008/11/mootoolstips-convert-v11-to-v12/ It does not seem the guy who wrote mootips supports 1.2.4... Is'nt that how you read it too? Otherwise we should look around for something else that does support 1.2.4... regards Nino

RE: wicketstuff-minis status?

no big deal either. Thanks, Natalie From: nino martinez wael [via Apache Wicket] [ml-node+2131419-210954253-229...@n4.nabble.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 2:19 PM To: Metzger, Natalie J. Subject: Re: wicketstuff-minis status? Well I have nothing planed

Re: wicketstuff-minis status?

Hi Nino, is there any update planned for mootools 1.2.4? Thanks, Natalie -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicketstuff-minis-status-tp1867557p2124092.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: wicketstuff-minis status?

apparently we're looking in the wrong directory: http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/wicketstuff/minis/1.4-SNAPSHOT/ Martijn On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Doug Leeper douglee...@yahoo.com wrote: But wouldn't i see the timestamp change on the jars, etc change with each deployment?

Re: wicketstuff-minis status?

Hi Doug, I originally wrote the prototip component, and the main reason why I never upgraded the prototip js version is because the library changed to having a commercial licence and I don't know exactly what the rules are about including commercial code into wicket-stuff. While I have no

Re: wicketstuff-minis status?

IF upgrading, it should be moved out of minies, so IT's really really clear. Otherwise people will get disappointed. 2009/11/18 richardwilko richardjohnwilkin...@gmail.com Hi Doug, I originally wrote the prototip component, and the main reason why I never upgraded the prototip js version is

Re: wicketstuff-minis status?

Why do you want to upgrade? I created the mootip integration, because I needed the ajax integration. 2009/11/17 Doug Leeper douglee...@yahoo.com We are about to integrate wicketstuff-minis in our project. However, we noticed on Nabble that prototip is out of date based on some comments by the

Re: wicketstuff-minis status?

Richard, Thanks for the update. This was one of the items to be looked at. But since prototip has moved to commercial, then I won't update the JS. - Doug -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/wicketstuff-minis-status--tp26394666p26408385.html Sent from the Wicket - User

Re: wicketstuff-minis status?

I was going to see about upgrading Prototip but the current version has moved to commercial license. Since that is the case, I won't be updating wicket-minis and will be looking at mootip. Thanks - Doug -- View this message in context:

Re: wicketstuff-minis status?

Great, so you are aware that theres a mootip in minis aswell.. If you have questions just ask -Nino(author of mootip integration) 2009/11/18 Doug Leeper douglee...@yahoo.com I was going to see about upgrading Prototip but the current version has moved to commercial license. Since that is

Re: wicketstuff-minis status?

But wouldn't i see the timestamp change on the jars, etc change with each deployment? from http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/wicketstuff/wicketstuff-minis/1.4.0-SNAPSHOT/ maven-metadata.xml 0.3 kb Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:16:32 GMT maven-metadata.xml.md5 0.1 kb Tue, 28 Oct