Hi, I'm looking to do exactly what was discussed in a thread a few years
ago (http://tinyurl.com/3yo43s), namely to dynamically include or
exclude a group of TR tags.
I can wrap them in a SPAN with a WebMarkupContainer, but I like to
have valid HTML and really don't want the SPAN tag in the
Did you try setRenderBodyOnly(true) ?
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I'm looking to do exactly what was discussed in a thread a few years
ago (http://tinyurl.com/3yo43s), namely to dynamically include or exclude
a group of TR tags.
I can wrap them
You can try wicket:container
wicket:container wicket:id=foo
tr wicket:id=dd.../tr
/wicket:container
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wickets-xhtml-tags.html#Wicket%2527sXHTMLtags-WicketTags
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I'm looking to do exactly what
Ryan Gravener wrote:
You can try wicket:container
wicket:container wicket:id=foo
tr wicket:id=dd.../tr
/wicket:container
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wickets-xhtml-tags.html#Wicket%2527sXHTMLtags-WicketTags
And that's even better. No ugly SPAN tags in the markup either.
Thanks Jeremy and
Off Topic, but does anyone else apart from Scott and me get confused by this
duality?
Should I setProperty, or override getProperty? And the equally annoying
Does getComponentX give me a reference to an already-created ComponentX, or
do I override it to supply my own ComponentX?
Charlie.
On
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 03:50:42PM +0100, Charlie Dobbie wrote:
Off Topic, but does anyone else apart from Scott and me get confused by this
duality?
Should I setProperty, or override getProperty? And the equally annoying
Does getComponentX give me a reference to an already-created
Yeah. It's a bit nasty, but there's not really any other way to have both
the flexibility and the convenience, unless you have some brilliant other
idea?
It's like jk says, normally you would use the setter, unless you need
on-demand evaluation per page-view.
Regards,
Alastair
On Thu, Apr 3,
