lso intersted out of curiosity.
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, 21 January 2009 11:03 AM
>> To: users@wicket.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Wicket / Spring bean annotations
>
some components and not
> others, and then passing around the reference. I'll stick to doing
> that, but I was also intersted out of curiosity.
>
> Andrew
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 21 January
und the reference. I'll stick to doing
> that, but I was also intersted out of curiosity.
>
> Andrew
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 21 January 2009 11:03 AM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
>
ry 2009 11:03 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket / Spring bean annotations
Although I do not know for sure, I would think not, because my
understanding is that a proxy is created that is safe to be serialized.
However, I would ask *why* do this? If you're passing it to anoth
Although I do not know for sure, I would think not, because my understanding
is that a proxy is created that is safe to be serialized.
However, I would ask *why* do this? If you're passing it to another
component, why not just have that component also use an annotation? I
wouldn't think that pas
Hi -
Probably a simple question : We are using Spring with Wicket in our
project. I have opted for the use of the Spring bean annotations as
described in 'Wicket in Action'. In the chapter on integrating the two
technologies the book explains that you should use proxies instead of
direct refer