Re: Wicket 1.4/2.0/nextStep

2008-01-14 Thread Martijn Dashorst
We haven't started it. We wait with starting new development until 1.3.1 or even 1.3.2 is released. We don't want to maintain two branches and first want to make the issue list for 1.3 a lot smaller before branching. Martijn On 1/14/08, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where can I find

Re: Wicket 1.4/2.0/nextStep

2008-01-14 Thread Martijn Dashorst
If you want to know when branches like this happen, subscribe to the dev list. We always vote for these kind of decisions, and for releases etc. Martijn On 1/14/08, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We haven't started it. We wait with starting new development until 1.3.1 or even 1.3.2

Wicket 1.4/2.0/nextStep

2008-01-14 Thread Stefan Lindner
Where can I find the subversion branch for wicket's next release? At http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/trunk/jdk-1.5/ I can't find the wicket base package. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: Wicket 1.4/2.0/nextStep

2008-01-14 Thread Martijn Dashorst
On 1/14/08, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This means, that we old wicket 2.0 users who are waiting for Generics, have to wait still some other months until 1.3.2 is done? No parallel development of 1.4/2.0.0? It's hard to be a wicket 2.0 user. Can you give us any timeline for

RE: Wicket 1.4/2.0/nextStep

2008-01-14 Thread Stefan Lindner
We haven't started it. We wait with starting new development until 1.3.1 or even 1.3.2 is released. We don't want to maintain two branches and first want to make the issue list for 1.3 a lot smaller before branching. Martijn This means, that we old wicket 2.0 users who are waiting for

Re: Wicket 1.4/2.0/nextStep

2008-01-14 Thread Martijn Dashorst
One thing you could do to help out, is to make sure we have all the missing part of the old 2.0 branch on our plate and in JIRA, assigned to release 1.4M1. This would make our job a lot easier and will prevent disappointments when we miss a particular feature. Another option is to add them to the

RE: Wicket 1.4/2.0/nextStep

2008-01-14 Thread Stefan Lindner
Dear Martijn, I understand your point of view and I did not want to blame wicket. We use wicket because we love wicket. Unfortunately we started using Wicket 2.0 early in 2007. The main reason for doing this was the ability to use the generic components of wicket 2.0 (version 2007). Once we have