I think it's looking okay, did you pick up the thing mentioned on the wiki?
You are not using ajax in Spring MVC? It would be wrong to just plain
compare non ajax to ajax..
Also you could write to the Jmeter list, to get a broader view of your
test plan.
Also you'll post results here ?
Hi Nino,
at the moment I don't want to compare Ajax so in the applications I
wrote for testing it's not used.
Sure, I will post the results here... probably the next week...
Attached the JMeter scripts I wrote (it would be better only one
script but at the moment the urls used are different). I
There is not much point in comparing Wicket to Spring MVC. Spring MVC
is a very simple action based framework with very little functionality
(and probably minimal overhead). So what you would really be comparing
is Wicket to JSP (assuming you use JSP as your view layer). Now again,
Wicket is a
Yes I see your point and you are absolutely right but please consider
that a lot of companies (included mine) have been using Spring MVC for
a long time and there are a lot of projects already in production
using that technology and working fine with the IT infrastructure now
available.
Of course
who cares, he says he has a database in there so the tests should be pretty
even.
for all we know wicket might be five times slower then spring mvc! and it
may very well be because spring mvc is so simple in comparison. but who
cares? a five fold improvement of something that is only five percent
You should also make sure that you are using DiskPageStore as pagestore.
-Matej
On 8/24/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
who cares, he says he has a database in there so the tests should be pretty
even.
for all we know wicket might be five times slower then spring mvc! and it
may
