is preferred, since SpringWebApplication is deprecated should we
avoid using it by using the ContextParamWebApplicationFactory?
Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
03/25/2010 05:03 PM
Please respond to
users@wicket.apache.org
To
users@wicket.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: WicketFilter Config
/2010 05:03 PM
Please respond to
users@wicket.apache.org
To
users@wicket.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: WicketFilter Config
recommended configuration is on our wiki's spring page
-igor
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:22 AM, mzem...@osc.state.ny.us wrote:
Due to the fact
: WicketFilter Config
Do you want/need to configure your application via Spring?
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:27 PM, mzem...@osc.state.ny.us wrote:
Igor,
We are using WicketFilter with SpringWebApplicationFactory. This works
fine, but I've noticed SpringWebApplication has been deprecated
: WicketFilter Config
Do you want/need to configure your application via Spring?
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:27 PM, mzem...@osc.state.ny.us wrote:
Igor,
We are using WicketFilter with SpringWebApplicationFactory. This works
fine, but I've noticed SpringWebApplication has been deprecated
Due to the fact that SpringWebApplication is deprecated, we evaluated
several ways of configuring Wicket using WicketFilter. I found
ContextParamWebApplicationFactory to work with a Spring Annotation
approach. SpringWebApplicationFactory also works with a Spring Annotation
approach, but
recommended configuration is on our wiki's spring page
-igor
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:22 AM, mzem...@osc.state.ny.us wrote:
Due to the fact that SpringWebApplication is deprecated, we evaluated
several ways of configuring Wicket using WicketFilter. I found
See if http://jweekend.com/dev/LegUp gives you an easy way to get started.
Regards - Cemal
jWeekend
OO Java Technologies, Wicket
Consulting, Development, Training
http://jWeekend.com
On 25 March 2010 18:22, mzem...@osc.state.ny.us wrote:
Due to the fact that SpringWebApplication is
