2008/9/12 Timo Rantalaiho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Jan Stette wrote:
Absolutely, I see what you're saying. Part of the problem here may be
that
on the project I'm working on, WicketTester is indeed used to do
integration/functional tests. I'm not sure why this was done in
2008/9/11 Timo Rantalaiho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Timo, thanks for your reply. See below for comments.
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Jan Stette wrote:
I've had a few problems with WicketTester recently and would like to
submit
a request for when it gets overhauled for version 1.5 (is that still the
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Jan Stette wrote:
Absolutely, I see what you're saying. Part of the problem here may be that
on the project I'm working on, WicketTester is indeed used to do
integration/functional tests. I'm not sure why this was done in the first
place, but it does seem to work - most
Hi all,
I've had a few problems with WicketTester recently and would like to submit
a request for when it gets overhauled for version 1.5 (is that still the
plan by the way?):
It would be really useful to have a clean way to hook in code to execute
pre- and post-request for operations that take
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Jan Stette wrote:
I've had a few problems with WicketTester recently and would like to submit
a request for when it gets overhauled for version 1.5 (is that still the
plan by the way?):
Depending on what exactly overhaul means (English is not
my native language), yes it
