Shouldn't this be on the dev mailing list instead?
-Original Message-
From: richard emberson [mailto:richard.ember...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 8:50 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: code review:
org.apache.wicket.pageStore.AsynchronousDataStore.removeData
[mailto:richard.ember...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 8:50 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: code review:
org.apache.wicket.pageStore.AsynchronousDataStore.removeData
org.apache.wicket.pageStore.AsynchronousDataStore.removeData
A little code review please
[mailto:richard.ember...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 8:50 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: code review:
org.apache.wicket.pageStore.AsynchronousDataStore.removeData
org.apache.wicket.pageStore.AsynchronousDataStore.removeData
A little code review please
mailing list instead?
-Original Message-
From: richard emberson [mailto:richard.ember...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 8:50 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: code review:
org.apache.wicket.pageStore.AsynchronousDataStore.removeData
:50 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: code review:
org.apache.wicket.pageStore.AsynchronousDataStore.removeData
org.apache.wicket.pageStore.AsynchronousDataStore.removeData
A little code review please:
In org.apache.wicket.pageStore.AsynchronousDataStore
public void removeData
org.apache.wicket.pageStore.AsynchronousDataStore.removeData
A little code review please:
In org.apache.wicket.pageStore.AsynchronousDataStore
public void removeData(final String sessionId, final int id)
{
synchronized (WRITE_LOCK)
{
String key =