RE: cannot render a menubar using menu2 package
The trick to solve the problem is to add getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true); in the method init() of the webapp, as indicated by Doug Thanks Doug! Rik From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: RE: cannot render a menubar using menu2 package Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:07:56 + Hi Doug, I've created a simple menu with menu2 and on Internet Explorer it works perfectly. But I have a problem with Firefox, because the submenus are not displayed, and the little symbol (the down pointing arrow right side the menu) is not displayed, too. The strange thing is that the MenuBar2Page wicket example works properly, because the submenus are correctly displayed on Firefox, too. The sources of the generated html seem equals (the references to the scripts are the same), but using firebug the only difference I noticed is that MenuBar2Page there is a request of map.gif, and this request is not present calling my page. Maybe I'm making another error, but I don't understand where I'm going wrong... Regards Rik Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 10:14:20 -0800 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: RE: cannot render a menubar using menu2 package Fantastic! I was getting a little nervous there for a second. Let me know if you have any problems/thoughts on menu2. Not sure how many are using it but my experience has been great (of course ;-) - Doug -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/wicket-success-stories-tf4877640.html#a14135545 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Scarica GRATIS 30 emoticon per Messenger! http://www.emoticons-livemessenger.com/pages/msnit/index.htm _ Scarica GRATIS le emoticon della tua squadra del cuore e il calendario di serie A! http://www.emoticons-livemessenger.com/pages/msnitcalcio/index.htm
Re: WicketTester failure (1.2.6)
Solved using
WicketTester#setStartPage( ITestPageSource ) instead of
WicketTester#setStartPage( Page )
Bye, Paolo
On Dec 5, 2007 4:18 PM, Paolo Di Tommaso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys,
I'm getting a WicketRuntimeExceptionin this simple unit test:
class SimpleTest {
@Test
public void createPage() {
WicketTester tester = new WicketTester();
PageParameters params = new PageParameters(office_code=FAAFG);
Page page = new PremisesListPage(params);
tester.startPage( page );
tester.assertNoErrorMessage();
}
}
I'm missing something to run test on page instances (instead of using
WicketTester#startPage(Class) )
Here it is the stack trace:
wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Can not set the attribute. No RequestCycle
available
at wicket.Session.setAttribute(Session.java:933)
at wicket.PageMap.put(PageMap.java :531)
at wicket.Session.touch(Session.java:744)
at wicket.util.tester.WicketTester.startPage(WicketTester.java:264)
at
org.fao.ocd.applications.coin.premises.ui.PremisesListPageTest.createListPage
(PremisesListPageTest.java :52)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethodRunner.executeMethodBody(
TestMethodRunner.java:99)
at org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethodRunner.runUnprotected (
TestMethodRunner.java:81)
at org.junit.internal.runners.BeforeAndAfterRunner.runProtected(
BeforeAndAfterRunner.java:34)
at org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethodRunner.runMethod(
TestMethodRunner.java:75)
at org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethodRunner.run(
TestMethodRunner.java:45)
at org.junit.internal.runners.TestClassMethodsRunner.invokeTestMethod(
TestClassMethodsRunner.java:66)
at org.junit.internal.runners.TestClassMethodsRunner.run (
TestClassMethodsRunner.java:35)
at org.junit.internal.runners.TestClassRunner$1.runUnprotected(
TestClassRunner.java:42)
at org.junit.internal.runners.BeforeAndAfterRunner.runProtected(
BeforeAndAfterRunner.java :34)
at org.junit.internal.runners.TestClassRunner.run(TestClassRunner.java
:52)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(
JUnit4TestReference.java:38)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run (
TestExecution.java:38)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(
RemoteTestRunner.java:460)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(
RemoteTestRunner.java:673)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(
RemoteTestRunner.java:386)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(
RemoteTestRunner.java:196
Thank, Paolo
Re: getApplication
Uwe Schäfer schrieb: Martin Funk schrieb: The Application you declare in the web.xml, so if you want your MyApplication you do it there and no need to fiddle with the getApplication() method. sorry, i did not make myself clear. i do declare my application in the web.xml. thats not what i am talking about. what i want here is typesafety without sprinkling my code with typecasts, but have one central cast in getApplication() of a base-page instead. cu uwe hmmm... for that case I don't have an elegant reasoning either and looking at the wide spread usage of Application.get() I wouldn't be suprised if there isn't any. carpe diem, Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: getApplication
On Dec 5, 2007 11:32 PM, Uwe Schäfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Funk schrieb: The Application you declare in the web.xml, so if you want your MyApplication you do it there and no need to fiddle with the getApplication() method. sorry, i did not make myself clear. i do declare my application in the web.xml. thats not what i am talking about. what i want here is typesafety without sprinkling my code with typecasts, but have one central cast in getApplication() of a base-page instead. That's what my suggestion does. Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to dynamically generate HTML page?
Hi Praveen,
Attached is the AutoComponentPanel.java. I've just re-written it so that
it implements IComponentResolver.
Parts of the code might be too complex and need to be refactored (some
parts working with org.w3c.dom), but for now it works. If you have
additions or modifications, please let me know. We plan to release this
code anyway either as part of a Qti framework, or just this panel as
part of some wicket-contrib / wicketstuff project.
Matthijs
PS. Wouter has uploaded his slides to slideshare:
http://www.slideshare.net/Func/wicket-dynamic-components
Pen wrote:
Thanks Matthijs,
I got a chance to look at Wouter Huijnink slides. This is what exactly I am
looking. Can you please forward the AutoComponentPanel code. That would be
great.
~Praveen
Matthijs Wensveen-2 wrote:
Hello Praveen,
Wouter Huijnink presented something similar to what you need at the
wicket meetup in Amsterdam. We generate html dynamically from xml, using
xslt. A component called AutoComponentPanel parses the html and adds
components to the hierarchy accordingly. This is actually a two-step
process. The first step is telling wicket you want to supply markup
yourself instead of letting wicket read it from the corresponding html
file. You can do this by implementing IMarkupResourceStreamProvider and
if applicable also IMarkupCacheKeyProvider. Then you need to parse the
markup stream and add components.
If you're interested I can send the AutoComponentPanel code. It still
needs some work to make it shine, but we plan to open source it anyway
as part of a wicket-based QTI framework.
PS. Unfortunately Wouter's slides aren't uploaded yet.
Pen wrote:
thanks Johan for your reply. I did take look into your slides.
We can generate HTML pages, we have no issue with it. But how to display
this newly created HTML pages which only exists in memory, there is no
physical file. And also to navigate to this new HTML page.
For example If I create a simple HTML page at runtime like below
test.html.
How to display it and navigate to it. As it also requires corresponding
test.java. This is simple one. But what if we have wicket:Ids we need
construct the Java files with all the action listener also.
test.html
html
body
h1Hello world! /h1
/body
html
~Praveen
Johan Compagner wrote:
Generate on one side the html by a servlet or special template
generator, that reads in your db data and generate the component
structure on the other side.
Look at he slides i put on of the presentation that i did for the
wicket user group in the netherlands
2007/12/4, Pen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I looked into the example wicketstuff-crud, this is basically in memory
database with basic CRUD operation. this is not what exactly I am
looking.
Let me restate the question. We have application where in user can
create
a
webpages using web designer by drag-n-drop where is html elements like
text,
image, selection box, combo box and save it in DB.
It will be Json format parse it to POJO and store in DB. for example
Image
object looks like this
which has got position, style, etc .
[{position:({left:60, top:40}),
size:({width:100,height:80}),
positionTop:40,positionLeft:60,sizeWidth:100,sizeHeight:80,
cssClass:,
style:left:60px;top:40px;width:100px;height:80px;,
]}}]})
Now we need to read from the DB and reconstruct the same Image object
has
a
html page. We can construct the above object with HTML tags.
But the question is how to display this html pages, since it exists
only
in
memory and also how to navigate to this newly created page.
~Praveen
igor.vaynberg wrote:
see how wicketstuff-crud does it in wicket-stuff svn
-igor
On Dec 3, 2007 6:30 PM, Pen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am a new wicker user. We need to construct/generate a HTML page
dynamically at runtime from the HTML elements like image and text.
This
page only exists in memory(session/cache) and there is no physical
file.
so
how to generate such page and corresponding java class. How this can
be
done
for static elements like image and text versus dynamically for form
submit.
Also how to navigate to this newly generated html page.
~Praveen
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-dynamically-generate-HTML-page--tf4940771.html#a14143413
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View
Ajax Feedback Problem in 1.3
Hi, I have a FeedbackTextField which extends TextField and implements IValidator (build with 1.2.5). If the textfield lose the focus, an Ajax call is submitted. The Validator looks if the textfield is left empty and throws a FeedbackMessage and the backgroundcolor of the TextField changes to yellow. First everything works as suspected. Then I changed the version to 1.3beta3. From that moment, there was no longer an AjaxCall when the TextField lost the Focus when its empty, if it wasn´t empty Ajax call worked fine. So the backgroundcolor didn´t change and the FeedbackMessage was not displayed until a formSubmit was called( by a button, e.g.). On a form submit, the feedbackMessage works correctly, and the Color changes. Then I changed to 1.3rc1 Now the same happens like 1.3beta3 (ajax + feedback problem), but on form submit, the feedbackMessage works, but the color does not change anymore for any reason. I guess the validator prevents the ajax call, but why does the color doesn´t change anymore. thanks in advance, Santiago -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Ajax-Feedback-Problem-in-1.3-tf4955701.html#a14191234 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 302 vs. 301 Redirect
what is the right way for a permanent redirect in the servlet spec? do it all yourself? Including making the url fully qualified? On Dec 6, 2007 9:49 AM, Joe Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wasn't suggesting changing the functionality of setRedirect, but instead maybe adding setPermanentRedirect(true) or another way for wicket to be able to perform a 301. On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 13:43 +, Gwyn Evans wrote: I think the one thread was Consistent homepage URL from 2005Q2 - I think the gist was that in the scenario there, it wasn't desirable having the redirected URL becoming the one that the search engines would always go to. /Gwyn On 04/12/2007, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Long long time ago we had discussions about this, i think also related to what google expects. I guess what we now have is a result of that. But i cant remember what the pros and cons are 2007/12/4, Joe Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED]: When you setRedirect(true), wicket does a 302, temporary, redirect. The basic rule of thumb in SEO is if you want to pass all authority to a different page use 301 (permanent). http://www.seotoday.com/browse.php/category/articles/id/477/index.php Thoughts on adding something to Wicket to support this functionality? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
remember, wicket meetup in San Francisco TONIGHT at Terracotta, 7:00 PM, 650 Townsend St. Suite 325
For those of you who expressed interest in a Wicket meetup in San Francisco, remember we're meeting TONIGHT at 7:00 PM. Here's the address: Terracotta 650 Townsend St. Suite 325 San Francisco, CA Any Terracotta folks who want to come are enthusiastically invited-- the more the merrier. I'm buying pizza, beer, and snacks. We're in the Sega building at the corner of Eighth and Townsend. The building is locked after six, but I'll let the security guards know people are coming. Hope to see you there! Cheers, --Orion - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Link to dynamic pdf (jasperreports)
Hi, Have you seen this other thread? http://www.nabble.com/wicket-File-downlaod-tf4874269.html#a13946961 There i've made some suggestions for dynamic generated pdf, with working code. Again, i don't know anything of jasper reports, but the person asked that time liked it. Also there is in the code the needed call to make it work with the download dialog. Bye, German It seems that Newgro wrote: Is this really unsolvable? Please can someone give me a hint? Thanks Per -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Link-to-dynamic-pdf-%28jasperreports%29-tf4936362.html#a14191604 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Using the fieldset label tags
thx On Dec 5, 2007 3:59 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: see (Simple)FormComponentLabel -igor On Dec 5, 2007 10:57 AM, Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I wish to add label tag to my form and put some styling on it. Is there a wicket side version of it? What would be the best way of using it? For instance, label tag has the for attribute, which should hold the id of the form component that it is asociated with. How can I render it from wicket? Can I use a WebMarkupContainer and an AttributeModifier? what would be a wicket way of handling form with fieldsetlabel etc? Thanks, f(t) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ajax Feedback Problem in 1.3
We need some code to go with your problem to correctly diagnose your problem. Martijn On Dec 6, 2007 1:13 PM, SantiagoA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a FeedbackTextField which extends TextField and implements IValidator (build with 1.2.5). If the textfield lose the focus, an Ajax call is submitted. The Validator looks if the textfield is left empty and throws a FeedbackMessage and the backgroundcolor of the TextField changes to yellow. First everything works as suspected. Then I changed the version to 1.3beta3. From that moment, there was no longer an AjaxCall when the TextField lost the Focus when its empty, if it wasn´t empty Ajax call worked fine. So the backgroundcolor didn´t change and the FeedbackMessage was not displayed until a formSubmit was called( by a button, e.g.). On a form submit, the feedbackMessage works correctly, and the Color changes. Then I changed to 1.3rc1 Now the same happens like 1.3beta3 (ajax + feedback problem), but on form submit, the feedbackMessage works, but the color does not change anymore for any reason. I guess the validator prevents the ajax call, but why does the color doesn´t change anymore. thanks in advance, Santiago -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Ajax-Feedback-Problem-in-1.3-tf4955701.html#a14191234 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-rc1/
Re: Wicket meetup in San Francisco
Great. See you at 7pm. Best regards, Al Orion Letizi wrote: Al, No worries. Since this is the first wicket meetup in San Francisco, I'd like to do it anyway to get the ball rolling. If you can make it, that would be awesome, even if you don't want to do a formal presentation. A number of people have expressed interest in just talking to a Wicket expert. Eelco has kindly offered to step in via videoconference if you can't make it, but having someone physically here would be great. There have actually been a few more people who have replied to me personally that haven't put themselves on the wiki. There should also be some folks from Terracotta there who would like to learn more about Wicket. I expect the next meetup to be more organized with an agenda of scheduled speakers, but I want to get something happening now before the initial local interest wanes. We've had interest from as far away as San Diego, so I think it's an important step just to get the first one started. Cheers, Orion Al Maw-2 wrote: Sorry, I've been pretty busy lately - I've not been checking the wicket-users list every day. If you want to get hold of me in a hurry, personal e-mail is a lot better. ;-) This is all rather last minute - it looks like we'd only be perhaps four people at best. I won't be very well prepared for a talk. Also, I'll be back out here fairly soon, I'm sure. With at least nine people potentially interested, maybe we should postpone this to a later date, with a bit more planning and notice for everyone concerned? If people are keen on pushing on with tomorrow regardless, I can make it, but I'll need to know by 2pm. Kind regards, Al Orion Letizi wrote: It looks like this Thursday, Dec. 6 is the leading contender, especially if Al Maw can give a presentation (haven't heard back from him yet, though). Otherwise, Eelco Hillenius has agreed to be there via teleconference, so there will be at least one Wicket expert available to answer the hard questions. Unless there are any objections, let's say Dec. 6th at 7:00 PM at the Terracotta offices: Terracotta 650 Townsend St., Suite 325 San Francisco, CA 94107 Cheers, Orion Orion Letizi wrote: For anyone interested in a meetup in San Francisco, it looks like this week might be best for two people and next week would be better for one person. I suppose we should vote. I'll propose two dates: Thurs. Dec. 6 Fri. Dec 14 Vote away... --Orion - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quoted from: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-meetup-in-San-Francisco-tf4937692.html#a14187737 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicket meetup in San Francisco
Al, No worries. Since this is the first wicket meetup in San Francisco, I'd like to do it anyway to get the ball rolling. If you can make it, that would be awesome, even if you don't want to do a formal presentation. A number of people have expressed interest in just talking to a Wicket expert. Eelco has kindly offered to step in via videoconference if you can't make it, but having someone physically here would be great. There have actually been a few more people who have replied to me personally that haven't put themselves on the wiki. There should also be some folks from Terracotta there who would like to learn more about Wicket. I expect the next meetup to be more organized with an agenda of scheduled speakers, but I want to get something happening now before the initial local interest wanes. We've had interest from as far away as San Diego, so I think it's an important step just to get the first one started. Cheers, Orion Al Maw-2 wrote: Sorry, I've been pretty busy lately - I've not been checking the wicket-users list every day. If you want to get hold of me in a hurry, personal e-mail is a lot better. ;-) This is all rather last minute - it looks like we'd only be perhaps four people at best. I won't be very well prepared for a talk. Also, I'll be back out here fairly soon, I'm sure. With at least nine people potentially interested, maybe we should postpone this to a later date, with a bit more planning and notice for everyone concerned? If people are keen on pushing on with tomorrow regardless, I can make it, but I'll need to know by 2pm. Kind regards, Al Orion Letizi wrote: It looks like this Thursday, Dec. 6 is the leading contender, especially if Al Maw can give a presentation (haven't heard back from him yet, though). Otherwise, Eelco Hillenius has agreed to be there via teleconference, so there will be at least one Wicket expert available to answer the hard questions. Unless there are any objections, let's say Dec. 6th at 7:00 PM at the Terracotta offices: Terracotta 650 Townsend St., Suite 325 San Francisco, CA 94107 Cheers, Orion Orion Letizi wrote: For anyone interested in a meetup in San Francisco, it looks like this week might be best for two people and next week would be better for one person. I suppose we should vote. I'll propose two dates: Thurs. Dec. 6 Fri. Dec 14 Vote away... --Orion - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quoted from: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-meetup-in-San-Francisco-tf4937692.html#a14187737 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [wicket-contrib] TinyMCE Hackery
I have just added TinyMCE to bamboo[1], but it won't build because of some log4j dependency problems[2]. Do you have to use log4j 1.2.15 instead of 1.2.14? Frank [1]: http://wicketstuff.org/bamboo/browse/WSTINYMCE-TRUNK [2]: http://wicketstuff.org/bamboo/browse/WSTINYMCE-TRUNK-1 On Nov 29, 2007 12:55 AM, Michael Laccetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Either way the CodeOgre one isn't going to go away, as it is where the Jazzy plugin will be fed from. --- Michael Laccetti (416)558-9718 S2G Limited http://www.s2g.ca/ --- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Bille Sent: November 28, 2007 3:57 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: [wicket-contrib] TinyMCE Hackery On Nov 28, 2007 5:24 PM, Michael Laccetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, I have made the modifications, committed, and pushed a new snapshot to the Maven repo. When bamboo comes up again I can ensure that the tinymce project is configured. Then it should post snapshots to the wicketstuff repo[1] Frank [1]: http://wicketstuff.org/maven - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicket meetup in San Francisco
Cant wait to be part of the next meetup preferably soon. Farhan. Orion Letizi wrote: Al, No worries. Since this is the first wicket meetup in San Francisco, I'd like to do it anyway to get the ball rolling. If you can make it, that would be awesome, even if you don't want to do a formal presentation. A number of people have expressed interest in just talking to a Wicket expert. Eelco has kindly offered to step in via videoconference if you can't make it, but having someone physically here would be great. There have actually been a few more people who have replied to me personally that haven't put themselves on the wiki. There should also be some folks from Terracotta there who would like to learn more about Wicket. I expect the next meetup to be more organized with an agenda of scheduled speakers, but I want to get something happening now before the initial local interest wanes. We've had interest from as far away as San Diego, so I think it's an important step just to get the first one started. Cheers, Orion Al Maw-2 wrote: Sorry, I've been pretty busy lately - I've not been checking the wicket-users list every day. If you want to get hold of me in a hurry, personal e-mail is a lot better. ;-) This is all rather last minute - it looks like we'd only be perhaps four people at best. I won't be very well prepared for a talk. Also, I'll be back out here fairly soon, I'm sure. With at least nine people potentially interested, maybe we should postpone this to a later date, with a bit more planning and notice for everyone concerned? If people are keen on pushing on with tomorrow regardless, I can make it, but I'll need to know by 2pm. Kind regards, Al Orion Letizi wrote: It looks like this Thursday, Dec. 6 is the leading contender, especially if Al Maw can give a presentation (haven't heard back from him yet, though). Otherwise, Eelco Hillenius has agreed to be there via teleconference, so there will be at least one Wicket expert available to answer the hard questions. Unless there are any objections, let's say Dec. 6th at 7:00 PM at the Terracotta offices: Terracotta 650 Townsend St., Suite 325 San Francisco, CA 94107 Cheers, Orion Orion Letizi wrote: For anyone interested in a meetup in San Francisco, it looks like this week might be best for two people and next week would be better for one person. I suppose we should vote. I'll propose two dates: Thurs. Dec. 6 Fri. Dec 14 Vote away... --Orion - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quoted from: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-meetup-in-San-Francisco-tf4937692.html#a14187737 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-meetup-in-San-Francisco-tf4937692.html#a14203327 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HTML .properties reload
I just upgraded from wicket beta2 to rc1 and found that my HTML pages and .properties aren't automatically being reloaded as usual. Did something change? I didn't see anything in the release notes. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/HTML---.properties-reload-tf4959815.html#a14205374 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is changing component hierarchy in onBeforeRender not recommended ?
Hi, I am using onBeforeRender for setting the visibility of some children. Wanted to know if this was ok or was dangerous and not recommended. Could someone more knowledgeable help please ? Thanks, Raghu - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is changing component hierarchy in onBeforeRender not recommended ?
should be fine as long as the children are downstream of the component tweaking their visibility -igor On Dec 6, 2007 7:41 PM, rkanadam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am using onBeforeRender for setting the visibility of some children. Wanted to know if this was ok or was dangerous and not recommended. Could someone more knowledgeable help please ? Thanks, Raghu - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
