so i tried to remove the generic type from component in
sandbox/ivaynberg/wicket-generics branch and ran into what i think is
a deal breaker for this design
class component {
public void setmodel(imodel? model) {...}
public imodel? getmodel();
}
that is all good until you want to have a
+1 for do it right, no matter if the api breaks or not
Am 07.06.2008 um 09:20 schrieb Igor Vaynberg:
so i tried to remove the generic type from component in
sandbox/ivaynberg/wicket-generics branch and ran into what i think is
a deal breaker for this design
class component {
public void
Zappaterrini, Larry wrote:
Sorry, I should have been more clear about subtype. :) When dealing with
raw types, the raw type is considered a super type of the generic type.
So Bar is a super type of Bar?. Since RawType extends the raw type
Bar, consider it to be a peer of Bar?. When you consider
hi igor,
that's a mess. :-(
i would go for decoupling component/model for 1.4 - that makes a clean cut for
the api towards generics. everything else is just half-baked.
my 2c, --- jan.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thoughts and ideas?
Is there much else apart from Generic's that's in 1.4 that would
benefit from a release 'sooner' rather than 'later'?
I know the intentions's not to have it much different, but not
changing 1.3's
I'm +1 for trying to decouple model from component, and if it takes
longer then so be it.
I'm pretty convinced that the problem is the 1-1 model-component
coupling and that generics only pointed out this problem.
Regards,
Sebastiaan
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
so i tried to remove the generic
The decoupling doesn't have to be extremely painful. We could leave
support for the default slot in component, something like this:
class Component {
protected void setDefaultModel(IModel? model);
protected IModel? getDefaultModel();
}
class MyComponentT extends Component {
public void
1) Generifying* Wicket
[ X ] Can best be done in a limited fashion, where we only generify
IModel but not components. I care more about what generifying can do
for API clarity (declaring a component to only accept certain models
for instance) than static type checking.
2) How strongly do
Hi Igor and others,
Great that you tried that out in practice!
On Sat, 07 Jun 2008, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
class component {
public void setmodel(imodel? model) {...}
public imodel? getmodel();
}
I was earlier trying out this variant:
public class Component {
public T Component
Hi!
Is there a way to always call a method in a wicket page even if the browser
back button is pressed?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/always-call-method-tp17708799p17708799.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi!
I have a table with sevearal rows and each row has a couple of YUI
datepickers (org.apache.wicket.extensions.yui.calendar.DatePicker).
I was wondering why the page loads very slowly and then I had a look
at the web page source code.
The web page is bloated with repeatedly submitted YUI
On Sat, 07 Jun 2008, Mathias P.W Nilsson wrote:
Is there a way to always call a method in a wicket page even if the browser
back button is pressed?
Yes, by putting no-cache headers in the previous page the
browser will request it again when you go back there.
Without explicitly disabling
Hi!
I am trying to maneuvre a lightweight gmail-style busy indicator to
stay in place whenever I click an operative button.
The script seems to work fine with regular submit buttons, but I have
not found a proper way to reset the indicator in context with ajax
buttons and links.
Is there an
i dont think listitem#setmodel is restricted in your example.to T in ListItemT
public T ListItem setModel(IModelT model)
the first T hides the T of ListItemT so you might as well have
said X setModel(IModelX model)
-igor
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Timo Rantalaiho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wicket supports global javascript event handlers for this. either
search the list or look inside wicet-ajax.js, i cant recall them off
the top of my head.
-igor
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Martin Makundi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I am trying to maneuvre a lightweight gmail-style busy
Howdy All,
There's a question at the end of this long intro:
I've been evaluating and comparing a number of Web frameworks again,
particularly at this time Wicket (which I have looked at previously
and tried out) and Django (which I am new to but comes highly
recommended).
I very much
On Sat, 07 Jun 2008, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
i dont think listitem#setmodel is restricted in your example.to T in
ListItemT
public T ListItem setModel(IModelT model)
the first T hides the T of ListItemT so you might as well have
said X setModel(IModelX model)
Heh, you're right of
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
wicket supports global javascript event handlers for this. either
search the list or look inside wicet-ajax.js, i cant recall them off
the top of my head.
They are mentioned in this thread:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Martin Makundi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I have a table with sevearal rows and each row has a couple of YUI
datepickers (org.apache.wicket.extensions.yui.calendar.DatePicker).
I was wondering why the page loads very slowly and then I had a look
at the
I haven't been much into javascript, yet ;)
It looks like an easy job for someone who knows what they're doing -
pull out the function name changes as parameters to the methods
instead of hardcoding for each FormComponent.
The main differences are:
initWIDGET123 = function() {
initWIDGET124 =
Hi!
Did I misunderstand something? I am not a javascript-wizard ;) I could
make it work perfectly with non-ajax buttons and links but it does not
seem to react to wicket ajax buttons.
Here is the script code, pls take a look if there is a blatant bug (I
assumed I do not need to make any
Hi!
I've created a custom websession for authentication.
Is there a way to get a localized string ala getString(key) in this
websession?
The reason why I want to do this is, because I want to create an localized
error message, for
userers, who try to login, before their account is activated
[X] Can best be done like currently in the 1.4 branch, where models and
components are both generified. I care most about the improved static type
checking generified models and components give Wicket.
I am just a little annoyed when a component not having a model causes generics
23 matches
Mail list logo
