Re: AW: Avoid serialization troubles with static members

2009-02-19 Thread Martijn Dashorst
If you don't want to use maven, then download the distribution of Wicket, and look in the lib folder. All the wicket jars are there. How did you get wicket-1.4-rc2.jar then? Martijn On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Christian Helmbold wrote: >> if the "org.apache" is missing, you're using an ol

Re: AW: HTML creation tool

2009-02-19 Thread Edwin Ansicodd
Thank you for your post! Yes, I would imagine a WYSIWYG editor would be best. Are there any open source or freeware tools you like? christian.helmbold wrote: > >> Any css based HTML creation tool recommended by Wicket users? > > > Are you looking for a so called WYSIWYG editor? Adobe Dre

Remove ancient Spring integration

2009-02-19 Thread Christian Helmbold
I've downloaded the Wicket-Spring integration from http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=119783&package_id=182494 but this site seems to be dead. Is one of the mainters here? Please remove this dead project from Source Forge to avoid confusion. Tanks. Christian -- http://www

Re: AW: AW: Avoid serialization troubles with static members

2009-02-19 Thread James Carman
Yes, but if the frameworks and tools can make you actually more productive, why not use them? The @SpringBean annotation-based approach just works. I've never had any troubles with it and I really don't have to think about it. There's a very shallow learning curve, especially if you're already u

AW: AW: AW: Avoid serialization troubles with static members

2009-02-19 Thread Christian Helmbold
> then I'd recommend using maven (or similar) :-) I try to use only tools I really nead. Sometimes it seems to me that in Java programming most time is spent in frameworks and tools and not in the programming itself. But, yes, I know the JAR hell and time for maven (or Ivy?) has been come to me

Can a TreeTable be pagable?

2009-02-19 Thread CraigGreenhalhj
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Can-a-TreeTable-be-pagable--tp22098653p22098653.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.ap

Re: AW: AW: Avoid serialization troubles with static members

2009-02-19 Thread Michael Sparer
then I'd recommend using maven (or similar) :-) managing all dependencies manually seems to me quite masochistically and yepp, you're using an old version of spring integration then ... christian.helmbold wrote: > >> if the "org.apache" is missing, you're using an old version of wicket. > >

AW: HTML creation tool

2009-02-19 Thread Christian Helmbold
> Any css based HTML creation tool recommended by Wicket users? Are you looking for a so called WYSIWYG editor? Adobe Dreamweaver is my favorite. Regards, Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apac

AW: AW: Avoid serialization troubles with static members

2009-02-19 Thread Christian Helmbold
> if the "org.apache" is missing, you're using an old version of wicket. I use Wicket 1.4 RC2. Maybe I use an old version (1.2.7) of the Spring integration. Where can I get the current version? http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/spring.html says nothing about where to download it (without maven)..

HTML creation tool

2009-02-19 Thread Edwin Ansicodd
Any css based HTML creation tool recommended by Wicket users? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/HTML-creation-tool-tp22098061p22098061.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -

Re: AW: Avoid serialization troubles with static members

2009-02-19 Thread Michael Sparer
if the "org.apache" is missing, you're using an old version of wicket. check your dependencies for 1.2 versions (the version before wicket moved to apache) for the DI stuff: I'm using the annotation approach throughout my applications and never had any problems regards, Michael christian.helmb

Re: Avoid serialization troubles with static members

2009-02-19 Thread Johan Compagner
but if you just use static fields then the only thing you have to do in your app is when the Application.init() is called you just set them once through a static setter on that component. (or reflection) So you have to do all your injection over your components onces at startup of your application

AW: Avoid serialization troubles with static members

2009-02-19 Thread Christian Helmbold
> a static service inside a component? Why not? Services are typically singletons and I can't see a problem to share an instance. From the dependency point of view it is equal to use * static Service svc, * transient Service svc or * Service svc I think the disadvantage of my solution is the in

AW: Avoid serialization troubles with static members

2009-02-19 Thread Christian Helmbold
Thanks for your answer. > > Wouldn't it be sufficient to use a static member to hold a reference to a > service? i.e. > > > > public class SomeWicketComponent{ > > private static MyService service; > > // ... > > } > > > > How would you intialize these? Would you have a static getter, and

Re: how to hide parameter in URL? for parameters

2009-02-19 Thread taha siddiqi
use a post request !! tawus On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:31 PM, wch2001 wrote: > > > Dear all, > > I am doing a project , there is one url with some parameters as below > > http://localhost:8080/dira/?wicket:bookmarkablePage=%3Asg.sphsearch.dira.web.wicket.pages.company.CompanyDetail&originPage=co

how to hide parameter in URL? for parameters

2009-02-19 Thread wch2001
Dear all, I am doing a project , there is one url with some parameters as below http://localhost:8080/dira/?wicket:bookmarkablePage=%3Asg.sphsearch.dira.web.wicket.pages.company.CompanyDetail&originPage=company&organizationId=191834 If I set mountBookmarkablePage in webApplication for Company

Re: Drop Down Box - Ajax Behaviour

2009-02-19 Thread Daniel Ferreira Castro
The method getHibernateTransaction is a need :) Hibernate complains if I try to do a select without an active transaction. But this is not the case, it is working fine - no runtime errors - so it is ok at the moment :) My problem is that After I submit the form, inserting on the bank a new Categor

ListView within a stateless form

2009-02-19 Thread Sandro Böhme
Hello, first of all I can say that I very much like the concepts of wicket. This is basically the first web framework whose concepts align with my understanding of how a web framework should separate the view, the business logic and the model. In a large web application we would like to work wit

Re: maven guru/wickstuff project maintainers..

2009-02-19 Thread Johan Compagner
and now it works fine. I think it is the network between that server and wicketstuff somehow. Because it is really not reachable when making a socket connection i will try to monitor it On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:34, nino martinez wael < nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah I know.. I rep

Re: maven guru/wickstuff project maintainers..

2009-02-19 Thread Johan Compagner
As far as i see TeamCity works fine For example inmethod-grid of matej is doing just fine IF i only checkout inmethod grid: +:/trunk/wicketstuff-core/inmethod-grid-parent/inmethod-grid=>. But if i want to build everything so the parent and the examples and the grid as once and i checkoout this:

Re: maven guru/wickstuff project maintainers..

2009-02-19 Thread nino martinez wael
One thing though is that you can get historical metrics(for available plugins), im not sure if you get that with the other build servers.. 2009/2/19 Martijn Dashorst > I'm willing to move to hudson (though I don't think hudson's interface > is inspiring). There has been some discussion moving fo

Re: maven guru/wickstuff project maintainers..

2009-02-19 Thread nino martinez wael
Yeah I know.. I reported that to sourceforge months ago... :/ And it seems to be very unpredictable.. However Jeremy's server seems to have no problems.. 2009/2/19 Johan Compagner > First i also have to checkout why this happens and why it happens only to > sourceforge wicketstuff > only from t

Re: maven guru/wickstuff project maintainers..

2009-02-19 Thread Martijn Dashorst
I'm willing to move to hudson (though I don't think hudson's interface is inspiring). There has been some discussion moving for Wicket core stuff to the Apache based hudson, but I haven't seen that much benefits from it. I might follow up on that. Martijn On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Johan Co

Re: maven guru/wickstuff project maintainers..

2009-02-19 Thread Johan Compagner
i see that wicket1.3 jdk1.4 is using these goals: -Pbamboo-jdk-1.4 clean deploy On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 08:03, Martin Funk wrote: > But those are only defined in profiles: > 'bamboo' and 'wickettraining.com-continuum' > > are those profiles pulled for the builds? > > mf > > Am 18.02.2009 um 22

Re: maven guru/wickstuff project maintainers..

2009-02-19 Thread Johan Compagner
First i also have to checkout why this happens and why it happens only to sourceforge wicketstuff only from that server Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Network is unreachable at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method) at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.doConnect(PlainSocketImpl.java:3

Re: Avoid serialization troubles with static members

2009-02-19 Thread Johan Compagner
no because the component isnt instantiated so that wount be called. after deserialization that field will be null. maybe you could bulid in a container/page a deserialize hook and when that is called go over all your components and inject it again johan On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 08:41, Martin Sac

<    1   2