On 07/29/2010 06:21 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
what version of wicket?
-igor
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Sam Grönblomsam.gronb...@eficode.fi wrote:
Getting this error when trying to use AnnotApplicationContextMock. Judging
by the example shown in the latest javadocs:
I receive this exception also on method Application.get();
It happens on Tomcat after a redeploy. When I remove the work directory of
Tomcat, and do a restart, the error is gone.
2010/8/2 Sam Grönblom [via Apache Wicket]
Apologies for the dumb question but I'm rather new to wicket and was
wondering if it is safe to use member variables within components
(i.e. compared to servlets, struts1 actions etc).
Many thanks,
Manos
--
Manos Batsis, Chief Technologist
___
_/ /_ (_)_
Apologies for the dumb question but I'm rather new to wicket and was
wondering if it is safe to use member variables within components
(i.e. compared to servlets, struts1 actions etc).
Mostly yes: The component instances are tied to the user's session via the
pagemap. But be wary of excessive
Hello Janos,
i have the excactlty the same problem with Wicket and JRockit R28.
The only way to fix it, was to go back to JRockit R27.
Hopefully they will fix it soon, the new R28.0.1 still has the problem.
A collegue of mine will do a post in the Oracle forums now.
regards
Daniel
On
Thanks guys for the input. Will give a yell when I have resolved it, thanks
for the time.
Reg
Niv
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 7:54 PM, vov vov...@mail.ru wrote:
Do not forgot about setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag(true) for your components
that initially as invisible.
And use AJAX...:)
--
View
I have a theory about what is causing this issue. Just wanted to run it by
you guys. In my log files, I first see this:
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.InvalidUrlException:
org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: After 1 minute the Pagemap null is
still locked by:
yes that is most likely the case.
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 16:17, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I have a theory about what is causing this issue. Just wanted to run it by
you guys. In my log files, I first see this:
maybe do the actual upload through and iframe or something that has
its own pagemap?
Or block the ui in the browser as long as the upload is in progress
(but then user can still do F5, but they should know that they should
wait for it)
You can also for example use a flash uploader to a servlet
Thanks! I guess it's now a matter of telling the user if you want to do
stupid stuff like this, it's going to cost you X for us to code around it.
I'm sure that should get them to stop what they're doing. :)
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.comwrote:
maybe do
On the submit link's onclick event you must iterate the form fields and run
the same script you do on the field's onblur event.
kjarbr
On 02.08.10 16.33, cresc md.naz...@gmail.com wrote:
I have implemented form component border to validate and show the error
messages inline just below
Yes, the code is designed to be thread safe.
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 07:15 -0700, fachhoch wrote:
I was looking into cometd , I tried the example it worked for me.I havea
new requirement ,
I have to update a panel in my page if a job running seperately in a
thread has finished processing.
but is it write to use web api in my service classes ?
My job is in service layer as its a thread and web has nothing to do with ,
now I have to call web api (cometd api ) inside my service classes is
this write ?
--
View this message in context:
Hi Kent, thanks a lot i will take a look a this
Regards,
Loic
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/WicketTester-and-Palette-component-tp2306743p2310424.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I'm using a wicket modal dialog with the panel that contains a div container
like
div id=slider/div
I want to access it from jQuery to create a jQuery UI slider like
$(#slider).slider();
For some reason, this doesn't work. Is there some reason related to wicket
that prevents this to find
How are you getting the Bayeux service?
It is alright to think of the Bayeux service as a messaging api, that
jumps across your various layers (from the service to the javascript
client). As long as you remember you can't trust the javascript clients
(malicious users), you are fine.
On Mon,
Please suggest me how to get Bayeux service in service layer , right now I
have in subclass of org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.Application
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/using-cometd-with-threads-tp2310323p2310715.html
Sent from the Wicket -
Problem: Encrypt sensitive form fields (ie ssn) on client (javascript)
Solution: Create behavior which fires javascript to hash field value and
replace original value (###-##-)
This sounds simple enough, but since the length of the hashed string will
be considerably longer than the
Why not use a password field to keep the value hidden and SSL to make sure
there are no man in the middle attacks. Seems like you are making it too hard?
- Original Message -
From: mzem...@osc.state.ny.us
To:
users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:00:55 -0400
Subject:
Encrypt
I totally agree, seems like double-duty that accomplishes very little, and
actually adds overhead. But this is another debate and the feature has
been requested and must be implemented as I described...
Craig McIlwee craig.mcil...@openroadsconsulting.com
08/02/2010 03:06 PM
Please respond
override getinputasarray() on the field and decrypt it there, that way
wicket sees the decrypted value
-igor
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:14 PM, mzem...@osc.state.ny.us wrote:
I totally agree, seems like double-duty that accomplishes very little, and
actually adds overhead. But this is another
if you open a page inside modal then the markup is in a different
window so you have to make sure your jquery script executes in the
right window.
if you are using a panel and the markup is rendered in the same window
it means your script is probably running too early.
-igor
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010
Thanks for the reply, that would work however per our business rules the
encryption must be one-way and will not be decrypted...
Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
08/02/2010 03:23 PM
Please respond to
users@wicket.apache.org
To
users@wicket.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Encrypt Form
In Wicket Extensions we have an ajax upload field iirc. That should
not block the pagemap...
Martijn
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
maybe do the actual upload through and iframe or something that has
its own pagemap?
Or block the ui in the browser
so how do you expect to validate on server side???
-igor
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:29 PM, mzem...@osc.state.ny.us wrote:
Thanks for the reply, that would work however per our business rules the
encryption must be one-way and will not be decrypted...
Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
Igor,
You save my life :)
if you are using a panel and the markup is rendered in the same window
it means your script is probably running too early.
That is exactly what was the problem.
I added
response.renderOnDomReadyJavascript(js);
In AbstractBehavior RenderHead method, and
The only thing I've come up with to meet all the requirements is to set
the hashed value to a hidden field, and replace the original value
(123-45-6789) with all nines (999-99-). This would allow the
validator to pass but puts a requirement on the js to validate the
original value, ie it
thats what i do...save lives :)
-igor
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:50 PM, zoran jeremy...@gmail.com wrote:
Igor,
You save my life :)
if you are using a panel and the markup is rendered in the same window
it means your script is probably running too early.
That is exactly what was the
My first Wicket application uses Wicket 1.4.9 and breadcrumbs where I
need to go from:
panel A / panel B / panel C
to:
panel A / panel B / panel D
by selecting a submit button on a form in panel C, e.g. replace panel
C (after processing the form) with panel D as the active
Then it's not encryption. Encrypted data should be readable to those who
have the key.
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 3:29 PM, mzem...@osc.state.ny.us wrote:
Thanks for the reply, that would work however per our business rules the
encryption must be one-way and will not be decrypted...
Igor
You can get it from the ServletContext:
getServletContext().getAttribute(BayeuxServer.ATTRIBUTE);
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 11:18 -0700, fachhoch wrote:
Please suggest me how to get Bayeux service in service layer , right now I
have in subclass of org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.Application
I've been looking for a shopping cart solution that I can properly
integrate with wicket. There's been a few threads on this list where
people have indicated they were building one but as far as I know
nothing has ever eventuated.
I don't really want to build to whole engine from scratch so
32 matches
Mail list logo
